Rumoured power outputs for '15
I just mentioned the STi and EVO. Don't know how much of a difference the regular WRX is. Yes I know they have different trans, and some different parts. Believe the AWD system is the same only dif I remember is you could change the differential settings on the STi. And I found the weight for the non-turbo impreza.
Couldn't find the weight of the fully dressed 2.5 with turbo and intercooler.
If you look back we were talking about weight reductions with a turbo 4 as opposed to a v6 and which would be easier to make power on as well as after market support for the engine itself.
Im just gettin anxious
Lol I still think this thread should end and just wait to see what ford will do to minimize weight and to see what they do to the engine line ups. I still feel it's way to early to even start talking about it till 2014.
Funny thing is that might be true.
The C7 gets 30mpg from a 6.2 liter.
If we get weight reduction in the neighborhood of 200lbs and increased aerodynamics, we'll see 28 mpg. If they also add DI, which is possible, we'd see an additional 10% +/- increase in mpg, which would put it over 30 mpg.
The C7 gets 30mpg from a 6.2 liter.
If we get weight reduction in the neighborhood of 200lbs and increased aerodynamics, we'll see 28 mpg. If they also add DI, which is possible, we'd see an additional 10% +/- increase in mpg, which would put it over 30 mpg.
Funny thing is that might be true.
The C7 gets 30mpg from a 6.2 liter.
If we get weight reduction in the neighborhood of 200lbs and increased aerodynamics, we'll see 28 mpg. If they also add DI, which is possible, we'd see an additional 10% +/- increase in mpg, which would put it over 30 mpg.
Last edited by steven46746; May 25, 2013 at 03:34 PM.
I fully believe the 30 mpg claim on the Vette.
The C7 getting a claimed 30 with cylinder deactivation bares no weight on the Coyote's potential to also get 30. As it sits, it is rated at 26 highway. Remove 200 lbs, improve aerodynamics, you'll be closer to 28. Add DI, it will get 30. Cylinder deactivation would push it even further, but I don't like CD anyways.
I fully believe the 30 mpg claim on the Vette.
Eco-boost Problems?
I just heard and read 400k Ford's Eco-Boost 6cyl in the F150 and Taurus is being recalled. Isn't this a similar power plant planned for the 2015 Mustang?
http://www.autonews.com/article/2013...AIL/130519929#
http://www.autonews.com/article/2013...AIL/130519929#
I just heard and read 400k Ford's Eco-Boost 6cyl in the F150 and Taurus is being recalled. Isn't this a similar power plant planned for the 2015 Mustang?
http://www.autonews.com/article/2013...AIL/130519929#
http://www.autonews.com/article/2013...AIL/130519929#
I thonk were gonna have revised motors but the same line-up with the v6, v8, and rolling coffin motors. It would be nice to see a single turbo sixxer pushin close to 350-375 to the wheels though. Or an EcoBoost 4 and bring out the SVO for some new light
No ford wouldn't make the base model have a turbo. Haven't anyone realized that every v6 of the same generation needs FI to be slightly faster than a stock GT? If it was a turbo 6 then people would just by the v6 and raise the boost to equal or surpass the v8 with less money spent, and I don't think ford is going to be that nice to people and let the base model cut into the GT's sales.
I doubt they will do that because if you tune it you'll get around the GT's hp an torque ratings if not more. There never going to make it so the base model can't match the performance model with just a tune. Haven't anyone realized every v6 had to get fI to be slightly faster than the stock GT of it's generation?



