2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Rumoured power outputs for '15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2013 | 08:04 PM
  #181  
lexi2013's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2013
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CCTking

Ford doesnt exactly reinvent something every couple of years. I mean look how long the 2v 4.6 was in the line-up, they stuck with it for a while. Then when the new camaro came out and stomped 2010 gt figures Ford responded with a brand new toy of their own in the form of the 5.0.

Now that the 50th anniversary and global push are around the corner it would make sense to bring somethin copletely brand new to the table
I just ford would put a big block in the normal gt that would be awesome. Or at least make a boss 429.
Reply
Old May 20, 2013 | 09:03 PM
  #182  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by CCTking
Now that the 50th anniversary and global push are around the corner it would make sense to bring somethin copletely brand new to the table
I would hate to see the coyote motor replaced with something all new for Mustang's 50th.

Its always seemed like Ford's engine program was a mess with many engine variants competing for the same slice of pie or just unnecessary duplication. Windsor vs Cleveland is a good example or with the Mod motor Windsor vs Romeo and the front dress and cam cover foolishness there or even say coyote vs 6.2L V8 in the trucks.

Why not just a short and tall deck version of the coyote so that Ford could better take advantage of economies of scale and further reduce the cost of the 5.0 and any derivatives
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 07:38 AM
  #183  
Free Agent's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 8, 2012
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Has Ford experimented with upping the displacement of the Coyote V8? Maybe using larger bores? I know the 5.0 is a hallowed displacement but a higher displacement version in say a top-level GT option or Mach1 version would be pretty cool. And it could help with their trucks as well. Just a thought.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 09:19 AM
  #184  
Krohn's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2012
Posts: 981
Likes: 4
From: Houston, TX
I'm still thinking the next GT wont be much more powerful in terms of peak horsepower numbers. However, delivery of it will change! It'll have better aerodynamics, and ACTUALLY be able to put it all to the ground. (praying the IRS works well)

I bet besides a small jump in power, it'll all be in making (in my opinion sadly) it more of a sports car rather than a muscle car.

Although it'll be a better sports car, i'm afraid it'll lose that throw-around-sleezy-girl vibe. The kind that tosses and turns, rolls this way, pitches that way, screams, screeches, you have to really man-handle to control yet puts the biggest smile on your face!

Ford hasn't disappointed me yet though and I'm not expecting this one to either.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 09:36 AM
  #185  
Mr. V's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2012
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 17
From: Ontario, California
Originally Posted by lexi2013

I just ford would put a big block in the normal gt that would be awesome. Or at least make a boss 429.
Sadly, I think the days of monster displacement motors is gone. Forced induction is the new hotness.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 09:55 AM
  #186  
cinque35's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2006
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: NY
Originally Posted by Krohn
I'm still thinking the next GT wont be much more powerful in terms of peak horsepower numbers. However, delivery of it will change! It'll have better aerodynamics, and ACTUALLY be able to put it all to the ground. (praying the IRS works well)

I bet besides a small jump in power, it'll all be in making (in my opinion sadly) it more of a sports car rather than a muscle car.

Although it'll be a better sports car, i'm afraid it'll lose that throw-around-sleezy-girl vibe. The kind that tosses and turns, rolls this way, pitches that way, screams, screeches, you have to really man-handle to control yet puts the biggest smile on your face!

Ford hasn't disappointed me yet though and I'm not expecting this one to either.
^ all this stuff
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 10:43 AM
  #187  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by Krohn
I'm still thinking the next GT wont be much more powerful in terms of peak horsepower numbers. However, delivery of it will change! It'll have better aerodynamics, and ACTUALLY be able to put it all to the ground. (praying the IRS works well)

I bet besides a small jump in power, it'll all be in making (in my opinion sadly) it more of a sports car rather than a muscle car.

Although it'll be a better sports car, i'm afraid it'll lose that throw-around-sleezy-girl vibe. The kind that tosses and turns, rolls this way, pitches that way, screams, screeches, you have to really man-handle to control yet puts the biggest smile on your face!

Ford hasn't disappointed me yet though and I'm not expecting this one to either.
Very well said. Although the three from detroit are still tryin to be muscle cars of yesteryear, i believe their more pony cars on the verge of being real sports cars. I wish we still had the rawness of four on the floor, big displacement carbed motors, and fat rear tires smoking at every stop light!

But progress is a wonderful thing and the big three have come a very long way. And it can only get better from here. Competition brings out the best so heres to hoping that theyll all use each other to please the masses.

Ford may bring a new design and have something ready for the 16MY Camaro and possibility of the Cuda coming back from Dodge. This would play right along with how they did the 10-11 transition. The new camaro was released onto our streets woth dominance so Ford responded with a brand new engine line-up so there is a strong possibility of a new line-up at the ready, just waiting to fire back and reclaim its throne should they fall to either of its biggest competitiors.

The next gen will be lighter, faster, more efficient, and overall better. I trust Ford will do this right since the Mustang is like their flagship. I have faith that the next gen will stun the world just we did with the 03-04 Cobra and new '13 GT500. Bring on the big 50th!
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 10:45 AM
  #188  
lexi2013's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2013
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
We already win the hp and torque race with the gt1000.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 11:20 AM
  #189  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by lexi2013
We already win the hp and torque race with the gt1000.
But thats not from Ford and its also not mass produced
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 12:19 PM
  #190  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by bob

I would hate to see the coyote motor replaced with something all new for Mustang's 50th.

Its always seemed like Ford's engine program was a mess with many engine variants competing for the same slice of pie or just unnecessary duplication. Windsor vs Cleveland is a good example or with the Mod motor Windsor vs Romeo and the front dress and cam cover foolishness there or even say coyote vs 6.2L V8 in the trucks.

Why not just a short and tall deck version of the coyote so that Ford could better take advantage of economies of scale and further reduce the cost of the 5.0 and any derivatives
All of this and your last post. I agree Ford could slow down a bit on the engines.

Side note:
I disagree that displacement is dead. GM still uses a 427. And a 376 and a 494. Ford is the one using small displacement to its heart's content.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 12:42 PM
  #191  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by lexi2013

Edmonds has the curb weight at 3215 not 3400. Either the wrx Sti weighs more than the regular wrx or Edmonds is wrong.
STi is 3385 and EVO is 3515. The regular impreza weighs around 3200.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 12:50 PM
  #192  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Originally Posted by Automagically

All of this and your last post. I agree Ford could slow down a bit on the engines.

Side note:
I disagree that displacement is dead. GM still uses a 427. And a 376 and a 494. Ford is the one using small displacement to its heart's content.
Chevy and dodge are still using big displacement motors but Ford is the one pioneering with smaller displacement and FI. The days of big motors are slowly dying and FI is the new trend. Ever restrictive emissions and mpg standards are forcing this upon us but i wouldnt say its necessarily a bad thing.
I mean look at the auto market. Supercars with hybrid powertrains makin stupid power, turbo 4 bangers able to hang with those a class above them, and lighter, faster vehicles are popping out like kids in springtime
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 03:13 PM
  #193  
Krohn's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2012
Posts: 981
Likes: 4
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by CCTking
Chevy and dodge are still using big displacement motors but Ford is the one pioneering with smaller displacement and FI. The days of big motors are slowly dying and FI is the new trend. Ever restrictive emissions and mpg standards are forcing this upon us but i wouldnt say its necessarily a bad thing.
I mean look at the auto market. Supercars with hybrid powertrains makin stupid power, turbo 4 bangers able to hang with those a class above them, and lighter, faster vehicles are popping out like kids in springtime
This. I'll admit... I wouldn't mind eventually owning an OEM 20XX Mustang GT-TT
There sure would be something world altering with stock twins on a Mustang V8 getting 30mpg+ with 500hp on a conservative tune...
and what would be even better! ...Is Ford doing all of that with a live axle. lol Just to **** everyone off. lol
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 03:41 PM
  #194  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by CCTking

Chevy and dodge are still using big displacement motors but Ford is the one pioneering with smaller displacement and FI. The days of big motors are slowly dying and FI is the new trend. Ever restrictive emissions and mpg standards are forcing this upon us but i wouldnt say its necessarily a bad thing.
I mean look at the auto market. Supercars with hybrid powertrains makin stupid power, turbo 4 bangers able to hang with those a class above them, and lighter, faster vehicles are popping out like kids in springtime
I get that Ford is doing this. Actually GM is too, look at the Cruze. I will say that turbo engines are no god send. The best feature is when not using the turbo you have a low compression small displacement engine. But under boost its no longer a small displacement. FI changes that. And it's no gas saint, it's a gas suck.

I do enjoy the trend though and I hope advancement continues.

Without weight and aero drag a big V8 can keep the efficiency up. Lets simplify and add lightness, rather than complexity.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 04:09 PM
  #195  
lexi2013's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2013
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by conv_stang

STi is 3385 and EVO is 3515. The regular impreza weighs around 3200.
Don't know where your getting that number from when I looked it up and the wrx (not Sti) is 3200ish on Edmonds.
Reply
Old May 21, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #196  
bt4's Avatar
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bob
I would hate to see the coyote motor replaced with something all new for Mustang's 50th.

Its always seemed like Ford's engine program was a mess with many engine variants competing for the same slice of pie or just unnecessary duplication. Windsor vs Cleveland is a good example or with the Mod motor Windsor vs Romeo and the front dress and cam cover foolishness there or even say coyote vs 6.2L V8 in the trucks.

Why not just a short and tall deck version of the coyote so that Ford could better take advantage of economies of scale and further reduce the cost of the 5.0 and any derivatives
I doubt Ford will introduce a new engine. Introducing a new motor is not exactly a wave of the magic wand. Design, testing, durability testing, certification--all take time. The EPA throws a myriad number of tests at mfgs. Clean fuel fleet, tier 0, tier 1, tier 2. CARB (California Clean Air Board) approval is also necessary (if you want to sell a vehicle in California.) The 5.0 didn't appear as a result of the Camaro. The 5.0 was in design and testing long before Chevy ever put an F5 on the showroom floor.

The messiness of Ford's engine programs approaches legendary proportions, but produced some of the most interesting motors to hit the streets, and to die on the shop floor. The Boss 429 NASCAR motor for example--not the choked version that made it into the Mustang. The aluminum block 494 with the dry sump oil system that Ford created for Can-Am. The 427 SHOC which Connie Kalitta used to destroy the competition with The Bounty Hunter. More recently even more exotic Ford projects strayed off the beaten path. The 412-HP 5.0 went mainstream in 2011, but Ford actually had a prior 4.9 mod motor in 2000 that spit out 415-HP. It was in an S197 with a 50/50 weight distribution, that never made it to production, (broke my heart). I liked the Boss 351 concept V10. (430-HP, 405-ft lbs) but it turned out to be just an engineering exercise. The V10 that was shoe-horned into the 2003 427 concept was sick. I had hopes when it made an appearance in project Daisy, but it never made it out of the concept stage (too bad).

Its been messy--but very interesting!
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 05:38 PM
  #197  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by lexi2013

Don't know where your getting that number from when I looked it up and the wrx (not Sti) is 3200ish on Edmonds.
Subaru's website
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 05:44 PM
  #198  
lexi2013's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2013
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by conv_stang

Subaru's website
Yes but was the number for the wrx as well? You do know the Sti and the wrx have different drive trains and suspension as well as a different transmission.
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 05:50 PM
  #199  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by lexi2013

Yes but was the number for the wrx as well? You do know the Sti and the wrx have different drive trains and suspension as well as a different transmission.
I just mentioned the STi and EVO. Don't know how much of a difference the regular WRX is. Yes I know they have different trans, and some different parts. Believe the AWD system is the same only dif I remember is you could change the differential settings on the STi. And I found the weight for the non-turbo impreza.
Couldn't find the weight of the fully dressed 2.5 with turbo and intercooler.
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 06:03 PM
  #200  
CCTking's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2011
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 6
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Id say add at least 100 lbs
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.