What are some improvements you want to see in the NEXT GEN redesign?
#661
GTR Member
I'd "settle" for an 8-speed auto transmission with paddle shifters. The new 8-speed auto that BMW is using is getting great reviews. Not only a superb 'box, but reduced fuel consumption and emissions, too.
There was a report a while back about Ford and GM working together on new gearboxes, with GM developing a 9-speed and Ford a 10-speed! I'm guessing neither of those will be available for the S550 launch, so if Ford are sticking with the 6-speed auto, I hope it has "proper" paddles as opposed to the SelectShift buttons.
There was a report a while back about Ford and GM working together on new gearboxes, with GM developing a 9-speed and Ford a 10-speed! I'm guessing neither of those will be available for the S550 launch, so if Ford are sticking with the 6-speed auto, I hope it has "proper" paddles as opposed to the SelectShift buttons.
#662
V6 Member
Join Date: April 8, 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not having this is something that really draws me to the Mustang. I actually hate that GM is doing this to the Corvette. Its benefits in real world driving are negligible. My G8 GT has it and I wish it didn't. I actually worry about what it might do the the engine in the long run as I plan on keeping it forever. I look at it this way. It adds unnecessary complexity with little to no benefit. Also if I am buying a V8 I want 8 cylinders not 4 firing all the time. A performance vehicle should not have compromises to that performance for the sake of minimal mileage gains. Want an aftermarket exhaust? Headers? Just wait until you hear it in 4 cylinder mode. You will change your mind. I also hope start/stop engine tech doesn't make it either.
I'm not against decent gas mileage. I think lowering weight, improving aerodynamics, and transmission tweaks can go farther towards mileage requirements more than shutting down cylinders. I hope the Coyote doesn't get this tech. I think direct injection would be more appropriate for mileage AND power as well.
#663
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please NO thank you.
Not having this is something that really draws me to the Mustang. I actually hate that GM is doing this to the Corvette. Its benefits in real world driving are negligible. My G8 GT has it and I wish it didn't. I actually worry about what it might do the the engine in the long run as I plan on keeping it forever. I look at it this way. It adds unnecessary complexity with little to no benefit. Also if I am buying a V8 I want 8 cylinders not 4 firing all the time. A performance vehicle should not have compromises to that performance for the sake of minimal mileage gains. Want an aftermarket exhaust? Headers? Just wait until you hear it in 4 cylinder mode. You will change your mind. I also hope start/stop engine tech doesn't make it either.
I'm not against decent gas mileage. I think lowering weight, improving aerodynamics, and transmission tweaks can go farther towards mileage requirements more than shutting down cylinders. I hope the Coyote doesn't get this tech. I think direct injection would be more appropriate for mileage AND power as well.
Not having this is something that really draws me to the Mustang. I actually hate that GM is doing this to the Corvette. Its benefits in real world driving are negligible. My G8 GT has it and I wish it didn't. I actually worry about what it might do the the engine in the long run as I plan on keeping it forever. I look at it this way. It adds unnecessary complexity with little to no benefit. Also if I am buying a V8 I want 8 cylinders not 4 firing all the time. A performance vehicle should not have compromises to that performance for the sake of minimal mileage gains. Want an aftermarket exhaust? Headers? Just wait until you hear it in 4 cylinder mode. You will change your mind. I also hope start/stop engine tech doesn't make it either.
I'm not against decent gas mileage. I think lowering weight, improving aerodynamics, and transmission tweaks can go farther towards mileage requirements more than shutting down cylinders. I hope the Coyote doesn't get this tech. I think direct injection would be more appropriate for mileage AND power as well.
But who knows, i may be dead wrong . For sure i wouldn't want a 4banger idling throuh my Bassani mufflers, that just wouldn't sound right.
Maybe my Mopar background restoring 440 shaker hood 6 pack Cuda's and Hemi's doesn't help....
I'm just a purist, what can i tell ya'....
#665
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Please NO thank you.
Not having this is something that really draws me to the Mustang. I actually hate that GM is doing this to the Corvette. Its benefits in real world driving are negligible. My G8 GT has it and I wish it didn't. I actually worry about what it might do the the engine in the long run as I plan on keeping it forever. I look at it this way. It adds unnecessary complexity with little to no benefit. Also if I am buying a V8 I want 8 cylinders not 4 firing all the time. A performance vehicle should not have compromises to that performance for the sake of minimal mileage gains. Want an aftermarket exhaust? Headers? Just wait until you hear it in 4 cylinder mode. You will change your mind. I also hope start/stop engine tech doesn't make it either.
I'm not against decent gas mileage. I think lowering weight, improving aerodynamics, and transmission tweaks can go farther towards mileage requirements more than shutting down cylinders. I hope the Coyote doesn't get this tech. I think direct injection would be more appropriate for mileage AND power as well.
Not having this is something that really draws me to the Mustang. I actually hate that GM is doing this to the Corvette. Its benefits in real world driving are negligible. My G8 GT has it and I wish it didn't. I actually worry about what it might do the the engine in the long run as I plan on keeping it forever. I look at it this way. It adds unnecessary complexity with little to no benefit. Also if I am buying a V8 I want 8 cylinders not 4 firing all the time. A performance vehicle should not have compromises to that performance for the sake of minimal mileage gains. Want an aftermarket exhaust? Headers? Just wait until you hear it in 4 cylinder mode. You will change your mind. I also hope start/stop engine tech doesn't make it either.
I'm not against decent gas mileage. I think lowering weight, improving aerodynamics, and transmission tweaks can go farther towards mileage requirements more than shutting down cylinders. I hope the Coyote doesn't get this tech. I think direct injection would be more appropriate for mileage AND power as well.
#666
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It has to sound bad arce and be able to spin the rear wheels with ease.
#667
V6 Member
Join Date: April 8, 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With all that said, it doesn't spend much time in 4 cylinder mode. Usually only loafing along at extremely light throttle. It will engage at highway speed on level ground for as long as a minute or two at a time but then it will run on 8 cylinders for a while (I would guess as to not wear/cool the non-functional cylinders overmuch) But that is my whole point. If the engine operates in 4 cylinder mode only 5% of the time (and that may be pushing it) What is the point of even having it? And I do worry about the special lifters for those 4 cylinders having a higher opportunity for failure and how exactly will the other deactivated cylinder/piston parts function after I've owned the car for 5,6,7 or even 10 years.
A lot of G8 GT guys will tune it out or shut it off with a handheld tuner. But of course the parts are still there. And there have been documented failures of the AFM lifters on these engines as well. It just seems to be TOO much potential trouble for TOO little gain in mileage. I'm not a fan of it if you can't tell.
Last edited by Free Agent; 2/23/13 at 06:11 PM.
#668
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,614
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
That sounds like a nightmare and pretty wasteful. Seems like its much more marketing than anything else. Doesn't Dodge also have a system like this?
Thanks for the info though, had no idea before. Really glad Ford doesn't have stuff like this
Thanks for the info though, had no idea before. Really glad Ford doesn't have stuff like this
#669
V6 Member
Join Date: April 8, 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And yes Dodge does it too even with their 6.4 liter 392 Hemi in the automatics. Haven't driven one of those to see how it behaves, but I'd guess it is similar. Their Ram trucks will even get stop/start "technology". This is even worse in my book. Why would I want my engine to shut off when I stop? And the fuel savings during idling at stoplights have to be even more minimal. At idle at a stop you might see fuel consumption rates of 0.60 gallons AN HOUR. So if someone spends 30 minutes at stoplights on their daily commute, it might save 0.3 gallons a day. Sure city people might like this but for the rest of us I would think its just a nuisance. It would be something I'd have tuned out if I was saddled with it. Again I'm not against fuel economy, but compromising performance vehicles for these marginal fuel saving "technologies" seems backwards. That's just me though.
#670
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#672
Cobra Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#674
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
I want power folding mirrors with integrated LED turn signals.
#675
GT Member
Join Date: July 31, 2012
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't care, since I also ran with a Diablo Predator tune, defeating MDS entirely.
IMO it's real tricky if not impossible to have a good sounding exhaust enthusiasts would like, tuned for differing numbers of active cylinders. Maybe there's a method of using valves in the exhaust system to achieve the best of both, but that then adds cost and complexity; and would likely diminish the aftermarket availability.
I'm glad I don't have MDS any longer.
#676
V6 Member
Join Date: April 8, 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes. My 2006 Charger R/T had "MDS" - aka Multiple Displacement System. Chargers came stock with a quite muted exhaust, MDS was part of the reason. Stock, it was nearly in-detectible when MDS activated. I did some minor exhaust changes with Magnaflow mufflers, and I could then hear the toggle from 8 to 4 cylinders. It didn't sound "smaller", but definitely worse, with more drone. Overall it wasn't pleasant. Certainly the more aggressive you did the exhaust, the more potential there was for it to sound like crap.
I didn't care, since I also ran with a Diablo Predator tune, defeating MDS entirely.
IMO it's real tricky if not impossible to have a good sounding exhaust enthusiasts would like, tuned for differing numbers of active cylinders. Maybe there's a method of using valves in the exhaust system to achieve the best of both, but that then adds cost and complexity; and would likely diminish the aftermarket availability.
I'm glad I don't have MDS any longer.
I didn't care, since I also ran with a Diablo Predator tune, defeating MDS entirely.
IMO it's real tricky if not impossible to have a good sounding exhaust enthusiasts would like, tuned for differing numbers of active cylinders. Maybe there's a method of using valves in the exhaust system to achieve the best of both, but that then adds cost and complexity; and would likely diminish the aftermarket availability.
I'm glad I don't have MDS any longer.
Sums it up nicely.
#677
Wow, I had no idea there was that much hate for cylinder deactiavation out there! Technology is not going away. From fuel injection, ABS and stability control the cars we love are going to be packed with more gadgets every year. I don' t see anyone refusing any of those tecnological advances for fear of malfunction. I also own a Pontiac G8 GT. My only complaint is the almost mute exhaust note. I'm willing to bet the C7 has a sweet exhaust note even with the new tech.
#678
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: January 14, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, I had no idea there was that much hate for cylinder deactiavation out there! Technology is not going away. From fuel injection, ABS and stability control the cars we love are going to be packed with more gadgets every year. I don' t see anyone refusing any of those tecnological advances for fear of malfunction. I also own a Pontiac G8 GT. My only complaint is the almost mute exhaust note. I'm willing to bet the C7 has a sweet exhaust note even with the new tech.
#679
Team Mustang Source
More...
...Alcantara or micro-fiber suede...on the cloth Recaros and Steering wheel and for 2015, a suede headliner should be an option on the GT/GT350/GT500
Cadillac XTS W20 Livery pictured
Cadillac XTS W20 Livery pictured
Last edited by Topnotch; 2/25/13 at 08:10 AM.
#680
Cobra Member
This may no longer be true. I might be wrong, but I think the new CAFE standards break up the model line by weight and have different targets for different weight classes. At least this was the plan when the legislation was being considered. I believe the new CAFE regs are much more complex than the old ones.