2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

412hp!!! Is it true???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #121  
coffeejolts's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2009
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by rony1976
Is 412 really that impressive? I mean, Saleen already did it with the Parnelli Jones. BMW can squeeze 400hp out of a 4.4L V8 @ 5,500rpm, I don't think 412 @ 6500rpm is that impressive... I'm all for Ford products, but I expected 450 out of it, not that close to 400.
Yes, it is impressive, because this engine is
  1. Naturally aspriated, not a twin turbo like the BMW 4.4L
  2. Going into a car with a base price of 28k.

And, while we're on the subject of twin turbos and output per litre...

Ford Ecoboost 3.5L (Taurus SHO): 104.29HP/L
BMW 4.4LTT: 90.91HP/L
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #122  
laserred38's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by i3arracuda
I really think it is impressive when you compare it to an M3. You have an engine that makes 2 less peak HP but nearly 100 more lb-ft of TQ, all in overall package that gets 20% better fuel economy and costs $20K-$25K less.
This.

It's impressive because this is in a fricken Mustang GT, not a $50k special edition (and hand built) Saleen or $70k M3.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #123  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by coffeejolts
Yes, it is impressive, because this engine is
  1. Naturally aspriated, not a twin turbo like the BMW 4.4L
  2. Going into a car with a base price of 28k.
If that price stays close or doesn't raise much, that will be an excellent feat!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:42 AM
  #124  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by SynisterGT
Autoweek
"To Ford Mustang fans, 5.0 means a lot, and the new 2011 5.0-liter V8 Mustang will deliver 412 hp and 390 lb-ft of torque, company officials said on Thursday. The information was supposed to be embargoed until Dec. 28, but news leaked out shortly after the announcement in Dearborn, Mich.

The new 5.0-liter Mustang produces 83 hp per liter yet will return 25 mpg, according to Ford marketing boss Jim Farley. The 5.0-liter Mustang’s main competitors are the Chevrolet Camaro SS, rated at 426 hp, and the Dodge Challenger SRT8, which makes 425 hp. Of course, the top-of-the-line Shelby GT500 and its supercharged V8 is rated at 540 hp.

What makes the brand-new V8 engine powering the ’Stang so potent is how engineers were able to allow the engine to breathe. All-new heads sit atop an all-new aluminum block with cast-iron cylinder sleeves. The wide distance between the heads allows for the intake ports to sit vertically on top of the engine. The engine features four valves per cylinder and twin independent variable valve timing. Tuned exhaust headers eliminate the need for aftermarket headers to let the engine breath better. Inside the engine are a forged-steel full counterweight crankshaft and four-bolt main bearings and high-performance pistons and connecting rods. Peak horsepower is reached at 6,500 rpm.

The new 5.0-liter Mustangs can be fitted with either the 6R80 automatic transmission or the MT82 six-speed manual.

The pony car will make its official debut at the Detroit auto show in January."



Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2009...#ixzz0a3gPZuA0

So I am glad that we have a forged steel crankshaft but when they say perfformance pistons and rods does that also mean forged as well? I don't want to worry about blowing out the engine when adding a sc to the already potent 5.0

So what they are saying is that going aftermarket with headers will not yield that much of a gain or what? Will there even be a need to replace them except for changing the sound?

I think just like when they improved the stock CAI, it will be the same with the headers... the 10's don't gain too much from a CAI like the 05-09's did. so i am assuming the same pattern will follow if they improved the headers.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #125  
TORQUERULES's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 31, 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Uhhh, that BMW 4.4 liter's horsepower is at 8,300rpm. You have been mis-informed if you heard it was at 5,500. The torque is at 3,900rpm and it is around 100 ft/lbs less than what the Mustang's 5.0 will achieve. Think of it as a V8 version of a Honda Vtec 4cyl and you have it. Impressive HP for its size, but not that impressive overall once you see the revs needed or the lack of torque. The 5.0 looks to be a great engine. Why not compare it to the 6.2 liter 4V V8 in the C63 AMG Mercedes? It makes 451hp with 32 valves and 6.2 liters. Now there are stronger versions of that engine throughout AMG's line-up, but we also hear that there will be stonger versions of the Ford 5.0 4V. Mercedes/AMG builds strong-running torquey powerplants and size for size the Ford 5.0 stacks up well IMHO.

Last edited by TORQUERULES; Dec 18, 2009 at 09:54 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #126  
i3arracuda's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Roxboro, NC
And for the record, the regular M3 gets the 4.0L V8. The GTS (which isn't available in the U.S. and costs about twice as much) gets the 4.4L V8.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #127  
coffeejolts's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2009
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by Tony Alonso
If that price stays close or doesn't raise much, that will be an excellent feat!
Correct, and I think MSRP will stay within 1k of the current model. This engine is going into the F-150, too, which gives Ford a lot of room to spread the development costs out.

It is amazing how engine technology is progressing. My 81 vette has a 5.7L V8 that produced 190HP from the factory and achieves 16MPG. The new 5.0L makes 412HP and gets 25MPG in the Mustang. We're having our cake and eating it too. The "good old days" are right now, people!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #128  
TORQUERULES's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 31, 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by coffeejolts
Yes, it is impressive, because this engine is
  1. Naturally aspriated, not a twin turbo like the BMW 4.4L
  2. Going into a car with a base price of 28k.
And, while we're on the subject of twin turbos and output per litre...

Ford Ecoboost 3.5L (Taurus SHO): 104.29HP/L
BMW 4.4LTT: 90.91HP/L

The BMW is N/A.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #129  
boduke0220's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2007
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 1
From: North carolina
****! ..im gonna go ahead and start saving!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #130  
osu1023's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 22, 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
we're getting confused on the different bmw engines. There's a 4.0 liter v8 in the m3 that revs beyond 8K with 414 hp and 300 tq, and then there's the 4.4 liter twin turbo v8 in the x6 and the 750i (and soon to be 550i) that revs over 6K with 400hp, 450tq Completely different motors. Anywho, this new 5.0 looks AWESOME.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #131  
CO_VaporGT_09's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 5, 2008
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Arvada, CO
Originally Posted by TORQUERULES
The BMW is N/A.
So there's a BMW 4.0 V8, N/A in the M3. Then there's the newer 4.4L TT V8 in the larger cars. Two different engines. BMW is switching to direct injection twin turbo engines from their past high-revving high specific output N/A mills due to fuel economy concerns, and I personally think lack of torque (M5 5.0 V10 380lb-ft). The next M5 is reportedly a pumped up 4.4 TT V8 @ 550hp, 500lb-ft.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #132  
i3arracuda's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Roxboro, NC
And there's a N/A 4.4L V8 in the M3 GTS (which is around $170K -- a bit more expensive that I originally thought). When I read the original argument about the Coyote vs. the BMW 4.4L V8 I was thinking of the base M3 (I forgot it was only a 4.0L). I consciously made the jump to the M3 because that's the only competitor to a V8 powered Mustang that BMW makes.

If we're talking about the new 5.0 vs a 4.4L TT V8, then what's the point? Anyone can slap two turbos on an engine and make power. That's not impressive at all.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #133  
TORQUERULES's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 31, 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by i3arracuda
And there's a N/A 4.4L V8 in the M3 GTS (which is around $170K -- a bit more expensive that I originally thought). When I read the original argument about the Coyote vs. the BMW 4.4L V8 I was thinking of the base M3 (I forgot it was only a 4.0L). I consciously made the jump to the M3 because that's the only competitor to a V8 powered Mustang that BMW makes.

If we're talking about the new 5.0 vs a 4.4L TT V8, then what's the point? Anyone can slap two turbos on an engine and make power. That's not impressive at all.
I forgot it was 4.0 as well, but still my argument stands. The 5.0 is right up there with much more expensive vehicles.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #134  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SynisterGT

So I am glad that we have a forged steel crankshaft but when they say perfformance pistons and rods does that also mean forged as well? I don't want to worry about blowing out the engine when adding a sc to the already potent 5.0

So what they are saying is that going aftermarket with headers will not yield that much of a gain or what? Will there even be a need to replace them except for changing the sound?
Depends on how much boost. This is not a hand built, built for boost engine so don't expect the strength and compatible C/R of the GT500. 8 PSI should be no sweat but don't expect to throw 20 PSI on it like a Cobra without building the shortblock for that.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #135  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
What IS impressive is if it can do it on 87, where the power comes in, and what can be done to it after.

Yes, there WILL be an aftermarket.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #136  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
Yes, there WILL be an aftermarket.
No way, for a Mustang? Never seen that....
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:28 AM
  #137  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by eci
No way, for a Mustang? Never seen that....
I shoulda added more, but I'll leave it for now.

Basically what I mean is that people who think this engine is tapped are completely mistaken.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #138  
mustangmaniak2010's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 17, 2009
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Bulgaria
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessss!!!! : metal::m etal:
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #139  
MBK's Avatar
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
just about 415... wonder if that will be the official number at the unveil. 412 seems odd from a marketing standpoint... any significance to that number? GREAT JOB btw Ford...
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 10:32 AM
  #140  
94gt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 27, 2005
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
OK media.ford.com spill it already! 25mpg impressive for that horsepower.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 AM.