412hp!!! Is it true???
I would hazard a guess of 410ft/lbs. I am thinking Ford may want to keep the hp and tq numbers similar. No real reason, but they seem to have done so in the past on a few recent engines.
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member





Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Here:

Depending on where you believe the possible peek RPM number is and what the corresponding HP number will be.
Still, it leaves it up to opinion really... What I made is just a general basis... The hp numbers are just nice easy round #'s... and the peek RPM is just an educated guess as to where it will fall perhaps.
If it's useful- cool. If not, it only took me 3 min to make, so no hard feelings.

Depending on where you believe the possible peek RPM number is and what the corresponding HP number will be.
Still, it leaves it up to opinion really... What I made is just a general basis... The hp numbers are just nice easy round #'s... and the peek RPM is just an educated guess as to where it will fall perhaps.

If it's useful- cool. If not, it only took me 3 min to make, so no hard feelings.
and if its smaller than the damned modulars... i might even find a way to stick it in the II
same here, I'm really hoping for slightly more torque than power
Last summer, I was told 340hp. My guess was 350-365hp. The only way I thought it would be around 400hp, is if they supercharged it.
Is this engine really for the GT? Not a Boss or Mach1? If true, I am extremely happy! But, I'll wait for the Next Gen Mustan
It was pretty much always 400.
This is not for the SE...it is for the GT.



.