Ford takes airbag recall national
Toyota and Mazda have dropped Takata now. Mitsubishi and Subaru are next.
Takata's share price has fallen 40%.
So seriously, when they go bankrupt, who is gonna fix our airbags?
The manufacturers will still be on the hook for the recalls, but what supplier is going to make a replacement when the copyright on the device will be tied up in bankruptcy court.
Takata's share price has fallen 40%.
So seriously, when they go bankrupt, who is gonna fix our airbags?
The manufacturers will still be on the hook for the recalls, but what supplier is going to make a replacement when the copyright on the device will be tied up in bankruptcy court.
Toyota and Mazda have dropped Takata now. Mitsubishi and Subaru are next.
Takata's share price has fallen 40%.
So seriously, when they go bankrupt, who is gonna fix our airbags?
The manufacturers will still be on the hook for the recalls, but what supplier is going to make a replacement when the copyright on the device will be tied up in bankruptcy court.
Takata's share price has fallen 40%.
So seriously, when they go bankrupt, who is gonna fix our airbags?
The manufacturers will still be on the hook for the recalls, but what supplier is going to make a replacement when the copyright on the device will be tied up in bankruptcy court.
Last edited by =HYPERDRIVE=; Nov 7, 2015 at 03:55 PM.
Federal fines make me laugh. The federal government will fine a company for wrong doing against the consumer, but where does that money go, and for what? I doubt it will go to the individuals who have been harmed by the defective part.
To me that is just 70 million dollars that can't be used to replace the defective parts.
To me that is just 70 million dollars that can't be used to replace the defective parts.
the government dont care, just another way to grab cash that will never be enough anyway- but in this case and many others, the fines go against making the repairs possible, creating a larger chance of injured citizens...but hey they got 70 million bucks to justify their existence
Mach 1 Member


Joined: June 22, 2013
Posts: 580
Likes: 101
From: the beautiful "Shenandoah Valley of Virginia"
I drive a 1977 F-150 with no air bags and 38 year old harnesses.
I drive a 1992 Thunderbird with no air bags and those stupid track running passive restraints ... that are 23 years old BTW.
My other 5 have air bags and anti lock brakes.
So now .... since getting the air bag recall notice .... the wife and I just wear full face helmets with visors when we drive / ride the Mustang.
Seriously though .... don't you rekon that your chances of surviving a serious frontal crash are still better with these air bags than they are without any air bags.
I drive a 1992 Thunderbird with no air bags and those stupid track running passive restraints ... that are 23 years old BTW.
My other 5 have air bags and anti lock brakes.
So now .... since getting the air bag recall notice .... the wife and I just wear full face helmets with visors when we drive / ride the Mustang.
Seriously though .... don't you rekon that your chances of surviving a serious frontal crash are still better with these air bags than they are without any air bags.
Last edited by tbear853; Nov 14, 2015 at 07:54 PM.
Gotta Have it Green Fanatic Official TMS Travel Guide




Joined: December 17, 2012
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 1,365
From: Western NC
tbear853, it's interesting you brought up old cars. I was thinking how simple and sweet my ride was yesterday in my '74 AMC going to a car show down in Atlanta. Cruising on I-985 both ways at about 60 -65 mph for two hours and no safety anything but 5 mph bumpers and a seat belt. Who says you can't live in the past.
tbear853, it's interesting you brought up old cars. I was thinking how simple and sweet my ride was yesterday in my '74 AMC going to a car show down in Atlanta. Cruising on I-985 both ways at about 60 -65 mph for two hours and no safety anything but 5 mph bumpers and a seat belt. Who says you can't live in the past. 

would hate to get in a wreck in one- no such thing as crumple zones back then- and the new frame is HEAVY- siderails I used 2x4x 1/4 tube, rear aches and torqueboxes plasma cut from 3/16 sheet...the front 3' of frame is original, but it was pretty heavy already...sure the body would easily shear the mounts before bending that frame much

there was a video of a 59 and a 09 impala doing the offset side impact test- the new one didnt even break a window, but the old one stuffed the front tire thru the interior, and the seats went out the windshield with the dummies...shocking how much safer a 'soft' car is.
Last edited by ford4v429; Nov 20, 2015 at 05:16 PM.
Received a update from ford today. Apparently they are making a temporary fix. And later when the parts are available they will make the permanent fix. My car is scheduled to go in 12/23/15. What the temporary fix is I don't know. Maybe they will hand you a balloon to blow up.
Received a update from ford today. Apparently they are making a temporary fix. And later when the parts are available they will make the permanent fix. My car is scheduled to go in 12/23/15. What the temporary fix is I don't know. Maybe they will hand you a balloon to blow up.
Wow, Good call, would have not bothered to check, nor have I received any letter from Ford. Interesting to say the least. Kinda pisses me off now. Lead to believe I was driving a repaired vehicle.
So that "newer" one was in June per the dealer letter, why in August did they do a recall that didn't do anything.
Some vehicles included in 15S21 are also included in 14B09. The repair parts for 15S21 have not yet been developed and will be the subject of a future announcement
Vehicles that are currently open in 14B09 and 15S21
Dealers should replace the driver
airbag inflator under 14B09.
Vehicles that are open in 15S21
Repairs will be the subject of a future announcement
04-AUGUST-2015
DEALER: Van Drunen Ford Company
WARRANTY CLAIM NUMBER: 097868 ODOMETER: 068085M
PART NUMBER PART DESCRIPTION
CONDITION CODE
CONDITION DESC
5R3Z63043B13A MODULE-AIR BAG 001 14B09B
REMOVED AND REPLACED DRIVER AIRBAG INFLATOR PER RECALL 14B09
So that "newer" one was in June per the dealer letter, why in August did they do a recall that didn't do anything.
Some vehicles included in 15S21 are also included in 14B09. The repair parts for 15S21 have not yet been developed and will be the subject of a future announcement
Vehicles that are currently open in 14B09 and 15S21
Dealers should replace the driver
airbag inflator under 14B09.
Vehicles that are open in 15S21
Repairs will be the subject of a future announcement
04-AUGUST-2015
DEALER: Van Drunen Ford Company
WARRANTY CLAIM NUMBER: 097868 ODOMETER: 068085M
PART NUMBER PART DESCRIPTION
CONDITION CODE
CONDITION DESC
5R3Z63043B13A MODULE-AIR BAG 001 14B09B
REMOVED AND REPLACED DRIVER AIRBAG INFLATOR PER RECALL 14B09
Why did the dealer do something they got paid for even though it didn't fix the car?
2 reasons.
They got paid for it.
They didn't know the new part wasn't gonna fix the car, at least they most likely didn't.
I think that first recall got suspended over the summer some time, when the news came out that the replacement part was no better than the recalled part.
2 reasons.
They got paid for it.
They didn't know the new part wasn't gonna fix the car, at least they most likely didn't.
I think that first recall got suspended over the summer some time, when the news came out that the replacement part was no better than the recalled part.
Originally Posted by Stoenr
Makes sense. My anger isn't with the dealer, I love my guys at the dealer, but Ford rather. Hopefully by the time spring arrives, parts that correct the issue will be available.


