What are some improvements you want to see in the NEXT GEN redesign?
#101
GT Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: June 15, 2010
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I must be the only guy here that knew what I wanted and got it. My car has nothing on it that I didnt want and there is nothing that its lacking that I would need. The only thing I would like to add to it is home link but I dont need it and it would be a very minimal addition.
#104
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#105
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The exhaust is sitting higher as well, what is the need for the rear ground clearance?
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Just wondering.
#106
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the impact point on the rear bumper (the actual beam that protects you) is higher in newer cars to pass safety regs. (protects against taller vehicles, plus it works to prevent other vehicles from riding up over it) you cant really compare the wild west car safety regs of the 60s and early 70s with a modern car. they are never going to look like that again. if you compared a new ferrari 430 and an old 308 you would see the same thing. gotta take everything in context comparatively to the modern car market.
#107
Legacy TMS Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
agreed. What is driving the tall rear decks? trunk space? with the fold down seats I really dont need all that space. I am sure a few people use it, but i doubt there are too many people that wouldn't buy a mustang because it can't hold four golf bags, when it can't hold four golfers.
The exhaust is sitting higher as well, what is the need for the rear ground clearance?![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Just wondering.
The exhaust is sitting higher as well, what is the need for the rear ground clearance?
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Just wondering.
A classic example of this would be the GT40 Bread Wagon (the car that killed Ken Miles).
Does anybody have a 05-09 vs 10-11 comparison pic? I'd be interested to see if thier is a perceptible difference in the deck height of each version? I thought onew of the tricks used to get hips on the current body was to simply raise the rear deck a bit.
Last edited by bob; 6/16/10 at 08:28 PM.
#109
FR500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those could be some things in combination with aero, rasing the rear deck helps smooth things out and reduces drag.
A classic example of this would be the GT40 Bread Wagon (the car that killed Ken Miles).
Does anybody have a 05-09 vs 10-11 comparison pic? I'd be interested to see if thier is a perceptible difference in the deck height of each version? I thought onew of the tricks used to get hips on the current body was to simply raise the rear deck a bit.
A classic example of this would be the GT40 Bread Wagon (the car that killed Ken Miles).
Does anybody have a 05-09 vs 10-11 comparison pic? I'd be interested to see if thier is a perceptible difference in the deck height of each version? I thought onew of the tricks used to get hips on the current body was to simply raise the rear deck a bit.
#110
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
the impact point on the rear bumper (the actual beam that protects you) is higher in newer cars to pass safety regs. (protects against taller vehicles, plus it works to prevent other vehicles from riding up over it) you cant really compare the wild west car safety regs of the 60s and early 70s with a modern car. they are never going to look like that again. if you compared a new ferrari 430 and an old 308 you would see the same thing. gotta take everything in context comparatively to the modern car market.
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachments/f806/76603d1276779585-what-some-improvements-you-want-see-next-gen-redesign-2010-biw.jpg)
Last edited by jarradasay; 6/17/10 at 07:03 AM.
#111
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Now they may be raising the rear for stability, to work as a wedge and provide some measure of downforce???
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#114
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wrong. Your thoughts were my thoughts originally, until I actually researched the body design. The bumper beam (the actual beam, black in the photo below) on the new mustang sits just behind the black plastic. Which is what is driving my questions. Compared to the photo of the 71 the bumper beams are nearly same height. So why the huge rear? I agree it is a general trend in industry, but why?
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachments/f806/76603d1276779585-what-some-improvements-you-want-see-next-gen-redesign-2010-biw.jpg)
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachments/f806/76603d1276779585-what-some-improvements-you-want-see-next-gen-redesign-2010-biw.jpg)
#115
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
actually from your pic it looks like it is sitting right behind the license plate which is where i would expect it to be. actually i think that picture is very telling if you look at all the structure built up behind it so your rear passengers dont end up in the front seats if you get rear ended. seriously tho all the idle speculation without looking at the CAD drawings. clearly there are reasons behind why cars are designed the way they are today. i am sure it is not just to **** off a bunch of old schoolers wishing for the designs of the 70s
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachments/f806/76676d1276867933-what-some-improvements-you-want-see-next-gen-redesign-plate.jpg)
Last edited by jarradasay; 6/18/10 at 07:32 AM.
#116
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure what you are looking at, but the beam sits just below the license plate. You can see the cut out for the lamp harness. The lisence plate is about three inches below the bottom of the deck lid, not eight. Also follow the body to bumper line on the qtr panel. This line lines up with the license plate and the beam is clearly below this line. If the beam were behind the plate it would make more sense going with the idea that the structure is designed to take the impact from a taller vehicle, but then the frame rails (core rail) would also have to be at that height.HMMM
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachments/f806/76676d1276867933-what-some-improvements-you-want-see-next-gen-redesign-plate.jpg)
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachments/f806/76676d1276867933-what-some-improvements-you-want-see-next-gen-redesign-plate.jpg)
seriously though, this site needs to work with ford to get some ppl from the mustang team maybe twice a year to answer questions like this. why and why nots from the enthusiast community.
#117
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
My next question though is why all the rear end ground clearance? from road to exhaust tip or black trim?? maybe to ease backing into a driveway?
This would be really nice. I am pretty sure we have a few ford "insiders" here that do just that, but a stronger participation would be awesome!
#118
Legacy TMS Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
I hear this. But isn't the least drag the shape of a water droplet, ie tapers completely to a point in the rear. Which would mean lowering the rear, similar to what they did in 71-73.
Now they may be raising the rear for stability, to work as a wedge and provide some measure of downforce???![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Now they may be raising the rear for stability, to work as a wedge and provide some measure of downforce???
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Down force probably isn't a big concern since most cars operating in the US don't go fast enough for it to be effective on a regular basis (and even at speeds where it might be effective, the roads tend to negate the need for it, ie; interstate highways - they are generally designed for speeds of 70+ MPH, but tend to be relatively flat and straight).
#119
Legacy TMS Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Also due to future product, alot of questions usually get the "sorry, I can't comment on that" smackdown.
Last edited by bob; 6/20/10 at 11:05 PM.
#120
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: January 14, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I missed someone else saying this I am sorry BUT, Along with the IRS lets get the car up to date and go with some Double A-Arm suspension up fron and lose the Shock tower design.