2015 Photoshop/Rendering Thread
10/15/13, 12:45 PM
#4184
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10/15/13, 12:47 PM
#4185
V6 Member
Join Date: October 13, 2013
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, the latest from Mustang6G:
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=876
Based on CAD files.
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=876
Based on CAD files.
Hopefully not.
10/15/13, 12:49 PM
#4186
Legacy TMS Member
10/15/13, 04:35 PM
#4191
I'm more inclined to believe this rendering is just an extension of Chaz's own design ideas and less inclined to believe it's based on any alleged cad files. Seems like a gimmick to get the 6G name out there, to be honest.
Chaz's work is good, I can't knock that. But I don't believe for a second that this is the design people are raving about, saying its one of the most beautiful designs of recent times. Whoever said that was obviously looking at something other than this. This is boring.
Chaz's work is good, I can't knock that. But I don't believe for a second that this is the design people are raving about, saying its one of the most beautiful designs of recent times. Whoever said that was obviously looking at something other than this. This is boring.
10/15/13, 04:58 PM
#4192
Bullitt Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this is really a base Mustang, I'm not disappointed. Put the recessed Focus ST type grill that we saw on the racetrack car and it would make a huge difference. Other subtle effects like a double bubble roofline or a rear spoiler will help too.
10/15/13, 05:07 PM
#4193
GT Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm more inclined to believe this rendering is just an extension of Chaz's own design ideas and less inclined to believe it's based on any alleged cad files. Seems like a gimmick to get the 6G name out there, to be honest.
Chaz's work is good, I can't knock that. But I don't believe for a second that this is the design people are raving about, saying its one of the most beautiful designs of recent times. Whoever said that was obviously looking at something other than this. This is boring.
Chaz's work is good, I can't knock that. But I don't believe for a second that this is the design people are raving about, saying its one of the most beautiful designs of recent times. Whoever said that was obviously looking at something other than this. This is boring.
...they are not the result of speculation, but refined from CAD images of the actual car, with our various spy photos used as a starting point. What you see here is a digitally accurate preview of the base 2015 Mustang...
I work in digital media professionally, and seeing/reading people throw around terminology without knowing what anything means irks me exponentially.
These new renders are just that: renders; artistic interpretation. That said, Chaz has certainly made nicely executed renders, and I appreciate them greatly coming from the field. But to call them THE actual thing is a bit disingenuous.
Last edited by druice; 10/15/13 at 05:11 PM.
10/15/13, 05:08 PM
#4194
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this is indeed what it looks like (or close to it), it does look pretty conservative in styling but I do like that it doesn't look like the squat brick with gun slits for windows that is seen all too often in amateur renderings. This rendering looks open, airy and light on its feet. It almost looks like a modern interpretation of a basic '65 coupe, unadorned and unpretentious.
That said, I'm not so sure how accurate this rendering is though. I think way too many people will say it's too "bland", "boring" and not boy racer enough and I agree that it doesn't quite look like the stunner that people who've seen it say it is.
That said, I'm not so sure how accurate this rendering is though. I think way too many people will say it's too "bland", "boring" and not boy racer enough and I agree that it doesn't quite look like the stunner that people who've seen it say it is.
Last edited by Wolfsburg; 10/15/13 at 05:12 PM.
10/15/13, 05:10 PM
#4195
Cobra R Member
10/15/13, 06:51 PM
#4199
V6 Member
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1. The original post from 6g contradicts itself:
How can you use spy photos as a "starting point," refine them from alleged CAD data, and call that an "accurate" preview? If you truly have CAD data, there's NOTHING TO REFINE on design. Anyone who's seen the unveiled front fascia photos will see that these renders don't match up. Look at the surface contours below the headlamps as they flow to center of the bumper. They don't pinch up around the grill surround in the actual spy photos.
I work in digital media professionally, and seeing/reading people throw around terminology without knowing what anything means irks me exponentially.
These new renders are just that: renders; artistic interpretation. That said, Chaz has certainly made nicely executed renders, and I appreciate them greatly coming from the field. But to call them THE actual thing is a bit disingenuous.
How can you use spy photos as a "starting point," refine them from alleged CAD data, and call that an "accurate" preview? If you truly have CAD data, there's NOTHING TO REFINE on design. Anyone who's seen the unveiled front fascia photos will see that these renders don't match up. Look at the surface contours below the headlamps as they flow to center of the bumper. They don't pinch up around the grill surround in the actual spy photos.
I work in digital media professionally, and seeing/reading people throw around terminology without knowing what anything means irks me exponentially.
These new renders are just that: renders; artistic interpretation. That said, Chaz has certainly made nicely executed renders, and I appreciate them greatly coming from the field. But to call them THE actual thing is a bit disingenuous.
BTW, you might want to take a good look at that comparison because someone photoshopped the pony in the grille that didn't exist previously.... you know, since we're all so hell bent on accuracy here.
Last edited by MRiley; 10/15/13 at 06:54 PM.
10/15/13, 07:03 PM
#4200
Bullitt Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think if you ignore the black velcro between the mule's headlight and foglight, it matches up almost exactly. The only difference I see is the recessed grille on the mule, which I like better. But then again I'm no graphic artist.