Autoblog mentions that this is just the base car. Throw some GT upgrades on it and it could look good.

 

is it just me or do those renders look like there is tons of room between the ground and bottom of the car?

 

Yes, I must be crazy, since I seem to have a different opinion than yours.

 

Thanks.


Different opinions is what makes us individuals. ;-)

 

It went from looking like a cheap Aston knock off, Jag wanna be, to looking like a Honda.
Hopefully not.

 

It's just a render. Based off CAD drawings. Jesus Christ.

 

pretty but reminds me alot of th audi A5

 

It's based off THE CAD files according to 6G. So it should be close.

 

I love the Audi !!! I almost bought one instead of the GT500

 

an audi a5/s5 or rs5 look absolutely amazing in real life

 

I'm more inclined to believe this rendering is just an extension of Chaz's own design ideas and less inclined to believe it's based on any alleged cad files. Seems like a gimmick to get the 6G name out there, to be honest.
Chaz's work is good, I can't knock that. But I don't believe for a second that this is the design people are raving about, saying its one of the most beautiful designs of recent times. Whoever said that was obviously looking at something other than this. This is boring.

 

If this is really a base Mustang, I'm not disappointed. Put the recessed Focus ST type grill that we saw on the racetrack car and it would make a huge difference. Other subtle effects like a double bubble roofline or a rear spoiler will help too.

 

+1. The original post from 6g contradicts itself:

How can you use spy photos as a "starting point," refine them from alleged CAD data, and call that an "accurate" preview? If you truly have CAD data, there's NOTHING TO REFINE on design. Anyone who's seen the unveiled front fascia photos will see that these renders don't match up. Look at the surface contours below the headlamps as they flow to center of the bumper. They don't pinch up around the grill surround in the actual spy photos.



I work in digital media professionally, and seeing/reading people throw around terminology without knowing what anything means irks me exponentially.

These new renders are just that: renders; artistic interpretation. That said, Chaz has certainly made nicely executed renders, and I appreciate them greatly coming from the field. But to call them THE actual thing is a bit disingenuous.

 

If this is indeed what it looks like (or close to it), it does look pretty conservative in styling but I do like that it doesn't look like the squat brick with gun slits for windows that is seen all too often in amateur renderings. This rendering looks open, airy and light on its feet. It almost looks like a modern interpretation of a basic '65 coupe, unadorned and unpretentious.

That said, I'm not so sure how accurate this rendering is though. I think way too many people will say it's too "bland", "boring" and not boy racer enough and I agree that it doesn't quite look like the stunner that people who've seen it say it is.

 

THANKS I HAD NO CLUE WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT. Its an F'in observation about the render.

Edit: also going to add that i even call it a render. Jesus Christ Read.

 

Looks like a refresh of the current model. Nothing more, nothing less. Looks good to me. Same old same old. Lol

 

:yawn:

 

 

And you know this how? Or are you just pissing in the wind hoping something sticks?


How do you know the front end of that spy picture didn't get modified before or after the alleged CAD images? Sure doesn't look like a finished product to me. It's already been suggested the final product could have made slight changes to this front clip so the fact that it doesn't match up only proves that it's not exactly the same as the one shown in the spy photo. Doesn't prove anything else.

BTW, you might want to take a good look at that comparison because someone photoshopped the pony in the grille that didn't exist previously.... you know, since we're all so hell bent on accuracy here.

 

I think if you ignore the black velcro between the mule's headlight and foglight, it matches up almost exactly. The only difference I see is the recessed grille on the mule, which I like better. But then again I'm no graphic artist.