2015 Photoshop/Rendering Thread
9/28/13, 08:27 PM
#4086
Have you seen the pics from the Hi-Po SVT thread? I can't imagine the regular Mustang and SE's having different body styles so I really think there will less of a fastback appearance than you're showing here and it will have a more level trunk.
Last edited by Fords4Ever; 9/28/13 at 08:29 PM.
9/28/13, 09:40 PM
#4087
Cobra R Member
I have a feeling that the "SE" Mule is a Vert... this drawing was done directly over a previous Camouflaged Mule. I do not see Ford loosing the Fastback Body style for a Less Aerodynamic Notchback Body. Especially since the 2015 is supposedly inspired by the Evos which is a Full Fastback design.
9/28/13, 11:23 PM
#4088
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a feeling that the "SE" Mule is a Vert... this drawing was done directly over a previous Camouflaged Mule. I do not see Ford loosing the Fastback Body style for a Less Aerodynamic Notchback Body. Especially since the 2015 is supposedly inspired by the Evos which is a Full Fastback design.
9/29/13, 01:56 AM
#4089
Cobra R Member
I stand by my rendering. The Overhangs you see are what We're going to get. I still don't understand how you can say the Front Overhang is too Long. We have already seen the Front End Unmasked, which is Exactly what I Used to Render My Front End. I may not be accurate on the details of the rear end, but the length of the Overhang is not going to change. It is too late in the game for Ford to be Testing something that would be Dramatically Different than what We can Clearly See Under the Car. The Proportions of This Car are Classic Pony Car Proportions.
9/29/13, 02:32 AM
#4090
GTR Member
Thread Starter
Tampa......personally I think your rendering looks great, and I think you're right about the overhangs. Only thing really in question is just how the fastback roof and trunk will flow. I like your angled trunk for a more "true" fastback look but, so far, the camo means it's pretty tough to work out what's really under there.
Keep working on it. Would love to see some colour (even though black's best
)
Keep working on it. Would love to see some colour (even though black's best
)
9/29/13, 08:01 AM
#4091
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Location: Traverse City
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Drawing looks pretty good. I don't like your interpretation of the rear end at all. IMHO, it's way too long. The camo is doing it's job. No one here is clairvoyant. We will see when the camo comes off.
9/29/13, 08:42 PM
#4092
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I stand by my rendering. The Overhangs you see are what We're going to get. I still don't understand how you can say the Front Overhang is too Long. We have already seen the Front End Unmasked, which is Exactly what I Used to Render My Front End. I may not be accurate on the details of the rear end, but the length of the Overhang is not going to change. It is too late in the game for Ford to be Testing something that would be Dramatically Different than what We can Clearly See Under the Car. The Proportions of This Car are Classic Pony Car Proportions.
Youre being tricked by the camo, Shortening the rear end is not a dramatic change, the proportions are gonna be close to the M4. Your does look good, but it looks like its the same size as the current model. I thought the GT was suppose to drop around 100lbs, i dont see that happening if its going to be the same size as the current car unless ford put carbon fiber or some other light weight material on pretty much everything.
9/29/13, 08:44 PM
#4093
Cobra Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Youre being tricked by the camo, Shortening the rear end is not a dramatic change, the proportions are gonna be close to the M4. Your does look good, but it looks like its the same size as the current model. I thought the GT was suppose to drop around 100lbs, i dont see that happening if its going to be the same size as the current car unless ford put carbon fiber or some other light weight material on pretty much everything.
9/29/13, 09:18 PM
#4094
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
9/29/13, 09:41 PM
#4095
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well you can see where the exhaust ends so I wouldn't think the camo is disguising/exaggerating the length that much unless the car is also sporting exhaust tip extensions? Have they been known to do that before?
My only minor quibble with Tampa's excellent rendering is how the belt line seems to dip at the door area. Kinda reminds me of the dip seen on Mustang II's which, in my opinion, contributes greatly to the "polarizing" styling of the II.
My only minor quibble with Tampa's excellent rendering is how the belt line seems to dip at the door area. Kinda reminds me of the dip seen on Mustang II's which, in my opinion, contributes greatly to the "polarizing" styling of the II.
Last edited by Wolfsburg; 9/29/13 at 09:50 PM.
9/30/13, 10:57 PM
#4097
I have a feeling that the "SE" Mule is a Vert... this drawing was done directly over a previous Camouflaged Mule. I do not see Ford loosing the Fastback Body style for a Less Aerodynamic Notchback Body. Especially since the 2015 is supposedly inspired by the Evos which is a Full Fastback design.
Also I think it's too early to assume that the naked front end we saw is actually the real front end. I just can't see Ford letting that slip when this whole thing has been such a well kept secret. The camo'd SE we have been seeing won't be that much different body wise than the regular or GT model and the SE looks much leaner that your drawing.
No offense but I just don't see "Mustang" in your drawing. But only time will tell.
9/30/13, 10:58 PM
#4098
10/2/13, 03:14 PM
#4099
Cobra R Member
So after the Interior Reveal showing the quarter Window shape I have tweaked my rendering a bit more. I also cut about 6" from the rear overhang. What do you guys think now?
Last edited by TampaBear67; 10/2/13 at 04:31 PM.
