Off-Topic Chatter Non-Vehicle Related Chat

Xbox One vs PS/4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 07:24 PM
  #101  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
http://m.imgur.com/a/eriA0

And that's probably the worst map, you should see the lighting on parcel storm.

On a side note, Ryse looks pretty sweet for console, I can feel the fps get jumpy on occasion, but overall great game so far.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 07:26 PM
  #102  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Hadtohaveit'13
Now it seems black ops 2 has been taken out of the equation. I'll get up ps3 ghost pics soon of the same spot. Also not sure where PC came from hence thread name
You said "incredible", so I thought I'd give a point of reference. By those standards any game released from here on out is incredible.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 07:37 PM
  #103  
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2010
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: MA (north shore)
Originally Posted by steven46746
You said "incredible", so I thought I'd give a point of reference. By those standards any game released from here on out is incredible.
But you're talking about two completely different types of gamers/mediums of gaming.

This thread is to compare ps4 and Xbox one. Of course PC had this years ago.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 07:38 PM
  #104  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Ghosts doesn't do the new consoles justice. Battlefield, on the other hand, looks great on the X1. Ryse is solid.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 07:45 PM
  #105  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
But you're talking about two completely different types of gamers/mediums of gaming. This thread is to compare ps4 and Xbox one. Of course PC had this years ago.
No doubt, was just a comment on "incredible"; not trying to start a war.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 08:47 PM
  #106  
Moustang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2012
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 13
From: Suburbs of Dallas
Originally Posted by Hadtohaveit'13
Now it seems black ops 2 has been taken out of the equation. I'll get up ps3 ghost pics soon of the same spot. Also not sure where PC came from hence thread name
The Xbox One and PS4 are both built using off the shelf PC tech and the games you mentioned were both built on the PC. In both cases the games still look closer to their PS3/Xbox 360 counterparts than they do a high end PC.

When you make a claim like "This game looks incredible" for some strange reason people expect INCREDIBLE graphics, not something that looks exactly like last generation with a slight update to the lighting, which is all Black Ops and Ghost achieve on the PS4/Xbox One. They are only incredible if all you have seen are PS3/Xbox 360 graphics which are based on 8 year old PC tech.

Personally, as far as graphics goes, i feel that neither of these games look as good as Crysis 3 on the PC, and that game is almost a year old now. I have trouble with the claim that a brand new game on a brand new console that looks worse than a year old PC game has "incredible" graphics.

Last edited by Moustang; Dec 6, 2013 at 08:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #107  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Crysis 3, oh she's hungry....

Throw witcher 2 on next gen and watch them melt!

While I agree pc is far superior, I don't regret buying a xbox one, aside from forza letting me down, all the titles I've picked up( nba 2k14, dead rising 3, and ryse) have all been great in one way or another. Cod on the other hand has always been crap and I'm sure they'll continue delivering the same pile of **** formula on "next-gen". Thank god I only lost $5 to it!

Last edited by steven46746; Dec 6, 2013 at 09:02 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:16 AM
  #108  
MDkid92's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 2, 2013
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, MD
As much as I agree, this ain't about PC gaming. Playing on a console vs. a PC are two totally different styles. Id say more people prefer consoles any day.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:23 AM
  #109  
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2010
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: MA (north shore)
Give me something that works. That can provide me the most value. Xbox one and PS4 are that. I don't want to have to update a PC constantly to play my games. Therefore that's why consoles have always been for me. This coming from a 23 year old guy working as an engineer in IT.

I just prefer the simplicity. Buy it once and be done.

But I plan on getting an xbox one sometime later next year. I'll have to get it for Halo 5. Gotta see what happens!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:40 AM
  #110  
narphenal's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2013
Posts: 341
Likes: 7
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Moustang
The Xbox One and PS4 are both built using off the shelf PC tech and the games you mentioned were both built on the PC. In both cases the games still look closer to their PS3/Xbox 360 counterparts than they do a high end PC. When you make a claim like "This game looks incredible" for some strange reason people expect INCREDIBLE graphics, not something that looks exactly like last generation with a slight update to the lighting, which is all Black Ops and Ghost achieve on the PS4/Xbox One. They are only incredible if all you have seen are PS3/Xbox 360 graphics which are based on 8 year old PC tech. Personally, as far as graphics goes, i feel that neither of these games look as good as Crysis 3 on the PC, and that game is almost a year old now. I have trouble with the claim that a brand new game on a brand new console that looks worse than a year old PC game has "incredible" graphics.
Of course a high end PC is going to blow consoles out of the water every time. That is like comparing a custom built Drag Car to a Stock Mustang; Many people are content with the performance of a stock car, as well as the comfort that comes along with it, others want sheer performance.

No one can deny the convenience and ease of access that the Consoles deny. Plus, consoles are a fraction of the price of a PC and offer numerous other benefits over a PC. But this is also not a PC thread, and no one really cares.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:54 AM
  #111  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
Give me something that works. That can provide me the most value. Xbox one and PS4 are that. I don't want to have to update a PC constantly to play my games. Therefore that's why consoles have always been for me. This coming from a 23 year old guy working as an engineer in IT. I just prefer the simplicity. Buy it once and be done. But I plan on getting an xbox one sometime later next year. I'll have to get it for Halo 5. Gotta see what happens!
Lol you make it sound worse than it is, I can install any game and I hardly have issues. Most of the folks complaining about pc games are trying to play on ancient hardware. I understand the simplicity concept but I look at like our cars and find it fun to tinker with the hardware, drivers, or settings to get the most out of what I have and the results are instant.

As far as updates go, the days of 5 mb patches are over. Every new game iced installed comes with a 1.5-6gb patch day one. Then every patch I've seen since has been around 1gb. Can't remember the last time I updated anything on my pc, don't know if windows updates count, but their tiny and don't really do anything....

$500 can at the very least buy you a pc on par with the current consoles though it wouldn't be as "living room" friendly right out the gate.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #112  
Moustang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2012
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 13
From: Suburbs of Dallas
Originally Posted by MDkid92
As much as I agree, this ain't about PC gaming. Playing on a console vs. a PC are two totally different styles. Id say more people prefer consoles any day.


Ahhh, you're one of those people stuck in the 1990s. How is gaming on a PC today any different from gaming on a console?

Both platforms have the same games. Both can use a gamepad. Both can be hooked up to your HDTV.


In fact, if you came to my house and I loaded up a multiplatform game, the ONLY way you would be able to tell if I was playing that game on one of my consoles or the PC would be if you saw me start it up. Once the game is running there is no difference at all, other than the PC having higher resolution and higher frame rates.




Originally Posted by narphenal

No one can deny the convenience and ease of access that the Consoles deny. Plus, consoles are a fraction of the price of a PC and offer numerous other benefits over a PC. But this is also not a PC thread, and no one really cares.

ROFLMAO!!!

I can certainly deny that consoles offer any more convenience than a PC. There is NOTHING you can do on a console that you cannot do on a PC and there are many things a PC can do that these consoles cannot. Can you use your console as a 4TB DVR? Can you play 3D Bluray movies on your console? How about play MKV movie files? How about post on these forums while watching a video and downloading a game all at the same time? How about something simple, like changing games without having to get up and change the disk in the drive?

I have a gaming/media center PC hooked up to my HDTV and stereo in the living room. I can play games on it just like a console, I can do ALL of the multimedia stuff that consoles can do and many things these consoles cannot do, I use it as my DVR, I can do online shopping with it, and I can stream or download content from either of the other two PCs I have in the house and use it.

Name me one thing you can do with your console that I cannot do just as easily on my PC.

As far as price goes, I would say the PC wins that. Expecially when you consider that you're going to own a PC anyways to do all of the stuff your console doesn't do, so really the only added cost to your PC is a high quality video card which costs less than a PS4 or Xbox One. Or are you going to tell me you don't already own a PC and have no intention of buying one? Even if you were to build one from the ground up, you can build a comperable PC for less than the cost of an Xbox One plus the wheel controller and Forza.

For the past 2 console generations the consoles have been working hard to become PCs. Now that they are almost identical you want to tell me that they are totally different? No son, there is almost no difference at all. The current consoles ARE PCs, they just have less functionality and are not upgradable. Remember that next time you are downloading a Windows 8 app for your Xbox One.

Last edited by Moustang; Dec 7, 2013 at 09:43 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 09:31 AM
  #113  
narphenal's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2013
Posts: 341
Likes: 7
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Moustang
Ahhh, you're one of those people stuck in the 1990s. How is gaming on a PC today any different from gaming on a console? Both platforms have the same games. Both can use a gamepad. Both can be hooked up to your HDTV. In fact, if you came to my house and I loaded up a multiplatform game, the ONLY way you would be able to tell if I was playing that game on one of my consoles or the PC would be if you saw me start it up. Once the game is running there is no difference at all, other than the PC having higher resolution and higher frame rates.
The entire interface is centered around the user making it much more accessible to anyone. Kids, wives, girlfriends, people in General will all agree that a console is much more accessible over a PC. Consoles are a much more casual experience and therefore have a more diversified userbase. Not to mention that there are many amazing releases that never get a PC port, just as the opposite is true .
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 09:51 AM
  #114  
Moustang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2012
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 13
From: Suburbs of Dallas
Originally Posted by narphenal
The entire interface is centered around the user making it much more accessible to anyone. Kids, wives, girlfriends, people in General will all agree that a console is much more accessible over a PC.
Really?

So kids, wives, girlfriends, people in general are doing all of their Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, music downloads, Youtube movie editing and uploading, and all other common forms of Social Media on their consoles and not their PC?



Consoles are a much more casual experience and therefore have a more diversified userbase. Not to mention that there are many amazing releases that never get a PC port, just as the opposite is true .


Consoles are a much more CONTROLLED experience, nothing more. Microsoft and Sony limit what you can do, what you can access, and what you can share. I guess you can call that a "casual experience" in much the same way that an iPhone is a more casual experience than an Android phone.

As far as diversity goes, there are more Youtube users than there are console owners, and I'm pretty sure no one is recording, editing, and uploading their youtube videos on their console.


And yes, the only things that consoles can do that PCs cannot is play console exclusive games. But then again consoles cannot play PC exclusive games either, so that's pretty much a moot point.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 09:59 AM
  #115  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by narphenal
The entire interface is centered around the user making it much more accessible to anyone. Kids, wives, girlfriends, people in General will all agree that a console is much more accessible over a PC. Consoles are a much more casual experience and therefore have a more diversified userbase. Not to mention that there are many amazing releases that never get a PC port, just as the opposite is true .
Lol I think everyone in this day and age can use a pc, especially windows 8 as moustang said. Smart phone, consoles, pc, it's all the same.

I will agree on the console ports, that's why I picked up one . But moustang is right, it feels like since the beginning of time folks complain about how much more a pc is or how it's more "complicated". It's not.

Sure if you build one yourself you'll have to be able to follow simple instructions, no harder than putting Legos together
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 10:00 AM
  #116  
steven46746's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 16, 2012
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Moustang
Really? So kids, wives, girlfriends, people in general are doing all of their Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, music downloads, Youtube movie editing and uploading, and all other common forms of Social Media on their consoles and not their PC? Consoles are a much more CONTROLLED experience, nothing more. Microsoft and Sony limit what you can do, what you can access, and what you can share. I guess you can call that a "casual experience" in much the same way that an iPhone is a more casual experience than an Android phone. As far as diversity goes, there are more Youtube users than there are console owners, and I'm pretty sure no one is recording, editing, and uploading their youtube videos on their console. And yes, the only things that consoles can do that PCs cannot is play console exclusive games. But then again consoles cannot play PC exclusive games either, so that's pretty much a moot point.
**** mous came to fight!! Lol
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 10:05 AM
  #117  
narphenal's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2013
Posts: 341
Likes: 7
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Moustang
Really? So kids, wives, girlfriends, people in general are doing all of their Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, music downloads, Youtube movie editing and uploading, and all other common forms of Social Media on their consoles and not their PC? Consoles are a much more CONTROLLED experience, nothing more. Microsoft and Sony limit what you can do, what you can access, and what you can share. I guess you can call that a "casual experience" in much the same way that an iPhone is a more casual experience than an Android phone. As far as diversity goes, there are more Youtube users than there are console owners, and I'm pretty sure no one is recording, editing, and uploading their youtube videos on their console. And yes, the only things that consoles can do that PCs cannot is play console exclusive games. But then again consoles cannot play PC exclusive games either, so that's pretty much a moot point.
Actually, most of them are doing it on their smartphones or tablets, and not a PC at all. Many homes are migrating away from owning a PC in General, or if they do have one, it's an all in one or a laptop/ultrabook that does not a have a GPU capable of running very many modern games. Not everyone has a home brew custom gaming PC in their house, and I'd be willing to wager that most towers inside of houses are outdated.

Again, my point still stands that Consoles are more accessible to everyone in general. A dedicated box to playing games...

It is ridiculously easy to download movies/stream shows on a computer, but people still purchase cable/satellite and buy movies.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 10:09 AM
  #118  
narphenal's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2013
Posts: 341
Likes: 7
From: Texas
Originally Posted by steven46746
Lol I think everyone in this day and age can use a pc, especially windows 8 as moustang said. Smart phone, consoles, pc, it's all the same. I will agree on the console ports, that's why I picked up one . But moustang is right, it feels like since the beginning of time folks complain about how much more a pc is or how it's more "complicated". It's not. Sure if you build one yourself you'll have to be able to follow simple instructions, no harder than putting Legos together
I'm not debating the ease of use of computers, as I have always found it very simple. The unfortunate truth is that many people are idiots, and that people will always have trouble operating any piece of technology. That being said, consumers want the easiest experience that follows the path of least resistance and takes the most minimal amount of effort possible, especially when towers in general are becoming more scarce.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 10:12 AM
  #119  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
most people I know use tablets and smart phones over the standard old school tower PC.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 03:41 PM
  #120  
Vader99's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2012
Posts: 215
Likes: 3
From: Tx
Who cares about pc's? The thread was about Xbox One vs PS4. I don't need to use my pc for a dvr I have one already. My pc is for recording music.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 AM.