Hydro-Powered Stang
#181
Originally posted by future9er24@June 9, 2004, 11:14 PM
the possibilities are endless. hey, when/if the oil reserves die out, what about all our buddies with classic stangs*? they wouldnt be able to drive 'em amore unless they modified them. i know some people would be ok with this, but i can bet most trailer queen owners wouldnt
*or any classic car for that matter
the possibilities are endless. hey, when/if the oil reserves die out, what about all our buddies with classic stangs*? they wouldnt be able to drive 'em amore unless they modified them. i know some people would be ok with this, but i can bet most trailer queen owners wouldnt
*or any classic car for that matter
#183
GTR Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
oh and Jgsmuzzy where on earth did u come up with OWLS from? do we looks like a bunch of lil kids that would call themselves OWLs?!?!?! nevermind... [/rant]
Anyhow, back on topic
James
#184
Originally posted by Robert@June 9, 2004, 4:18 PM
Yet in spite of the clear evidence available all around us, there are many who still do not believe that Global Warming is a problem at all. And it’s no wonder: Because they are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, out of a fear that their profits might be affected if they had to stop dumping so much pollution into the atmosphere.
Yet in spite of the clear evidence available all around us, there are many who still do not believe that Global Warming is a problem at all. And it’s no wonder: Because they are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, out of a fear that their profits might be affected if they had to stop dumping so much pollution into the atmosphere.
![Smile](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#185
Originally posted by WaveMan2k3@June 9, 2004, 5:03 PM
Heh, sorry dude I just do that when I begin to rant on about something. My bad.
Heh, sorry dude I just do that when I begin to rant on about something. My bad.
![Biggrinjester](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrinjester.gif)
#186
Cobra R Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Heard on the News Yesterday, Gas Prices in Iran right now are $ 0.05 a Gallon, That's Five Cents!
If Oil in Iran is so plentiful that they pay Five Cents a Gallon After refining it, Imagine how Cheap Hydrogen would be, considering that Most of the Universe is Made Up of Hydrogen.
![Mad](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/mad.gif)
![04](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/04.gif)
#187
Originally posted by ManEHawke@June 9, 2004, 10:20 PM
Maybe when hydrogen becomes the primary fuel source they will still have some petroleum for sell. Maybe 10 X's as expensive, but i'm sure it won't become 100% gone.
I WILL do everything in my power to someday own a 1969-1970 Boss Mustang. And it will need the precious gasoline.
Maybe when hydrogen becomes the primary fuel source they will still have some petroleum for sell. Maybe 10 X's as expensive, but i'm sure it won't become 100% gone.
I WILL do everything in my power to someday own a 1969-1970 Boss Mustang. And it will need the precious gasoline.
![04](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/04.gif)
#188
Thanks, Robert (and the others). Nice post. Good points. The fact alone that the administration refused to sign the Kyoto protocol is a good reason not to vote for Bush again. I just don't get why people rather care for the fuel prices of today than for their children's life of tomorrow...
#189
What exactly would need to be changed to make an engine run on hydrogen? I would assume ignition timing, maybe compression and valve timing. Stock injectors might work but if you're running a carb that would have to be replaced.
#190
Originally posted by Decipher+June 10, 2004, 3:28 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Decipher @ June 10, 2004, 3:28 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ManEHawke@June 9, 2004, 10:20 PM
Maybe when hydrogen becomes the primary fuel source they will still have some petroleum for sell. Maybe 10 X's as expensive, but i'm sure it won't become 100% gone.
I WILL do everything in my power to someday own a 1969-1970 Boss Mustang. And it will need the precious gasoline.
Maybe when hydrogen becomes the primary fuel source they will still have some petroleum for sell. Maybe 10 X's as expensive, but i'm sure it won't become 100% gone.
I WILL do everything in my power to someday own a 1969-1970 Boss Mustang. And it will need the precious gasoline.
![04](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/04.gif)
No dude you'd have to get a brand new generation fuel injected motor. It said in one of the links either I posted or someone else posted in here. So to convert over a classic you'd have to get a new crate engine and then upgrade that to hydro. Now you're probably thing why would I get a new engine just because it is fuel injected, when i can just get a new fuel injected intake manifold to replace the carbs? Well the answer cannot be anymore simple really. Hydro ICE's need to have one thing that old classic cars don't have, an on board computer. Classic engines aren't compatible with on board pcs to control how lean the fuel mixture is and all that good stuff. That has only been in cars sine the late '80s. So all older cars would need the engine totally upgraded at this point in time. If I had lets say an old '69 Mach 1, and I wanted to convert it over to running on hydro. I'd get myself a new Ford 351 (Racing) Clevland Crate Engine and all the computer components that we got now yo upgrade everything on the Mach 1 so that it would be a new car. But hey thats just me.
#191
I'm not sure I agree with that, WaveMan. What do the new motors have that the old ones don't? Sensors, that's what. Sure some of the technology is better but that shouldn't affect whether it can run hydro or not. I'm sure the sensors could be retro-fitted. You would have sensors like O2, exhaust temp, water temp, etc. All that could be put on without having to get a new engine.
And honestly I don't think any of that is absolutely necessary. The reason I say that is because some of the natural gas conversions that are available for existing cars. They have modified computers for newer vehicles to optimize it's use but older vehicles don't need it. If I'm not mistaken some don't have any computer at all and the ones that do have limited or no sensors. It's like carburetors. Everything use to have a carb and they were simply mechanical devices. Then they started hooking up all theses sensors to the engine and carb and connecting them to a computer. Now the engine ran better, more efficiently and under more diverse conditions. But the old mechanical carbs still worked fine. That's the way it is for natural gas and I would assume it would be the same for hydrogen
And honestly I don't think any of that is absolutely necessary. The reason I say that is because some of the natural gas conversions that are available for existing cars. They have modified computers for newer vehicles to optimize it's use but older vehicles don't need it. If I'm not mistaken some don't have any computer at all and the ones that do have limited or no sensors. It's like carburetors. Everything use to have a carb and they were simply mechanical devices. Then they started hooking up all theses sensors to the engine and carb and connecting them to a computer. Now the engine ran better, more efficiently and under more diverse conditions. But the old mechanical carbs still worked fine. That's the way it is for natural gas and I would assume it would be the same for hydrogen
#192
Well no matter what you'd have to convert the engine over to fuel injected so no carbs. I know for a fact that the site with the hydro corvette said it has to be fuel injected or else it wont work. As for the sensors yah granted some can be retro-fitted some parts though might not be able to, it's hard to say really because of the limited amount that we as a group know about Hydro ICE's. I have a feeling though that they would need a lot more then just a few sensors because I got the idea from that site with the corvette that it would take a heck of a lot of money at the moment to just upgrade a modern engine to run on hydrogen. So i can only imagine just how much would need to go into converting a classics engine over, because lets face it they aren't as efficient as new engines and they don't have like half the crap on them that new engines got (senors and other computer components, lets not forget with a modern engine all u have to do is hook up a computer to the diagnostics port in the interior and u can add like 90+ hp and 75+ tq to the vehicle, some even more then that). New engines granted they are based on the same principles as the old classics they are much more complex because of all the computer and its sensors and controllers all over the engine and the rest of the vehicle for that matter. All of those cost a heck of alot of money to add to an engine of any era nevermind having to pay a ton more money to get a kit to convert it all over to hydrogen. All that money with all the retro-fitting to a classic's engine could possibly double the cost of converting. Again though its hard to really say right, but granted new crate engines cost an arm and a leg to get but they already have all the computer and the sensors and controllers all hooked up to them so that they can make the hp that that engine is supposed to be making. So it wouldnt cost as much so convert it over to hydrogen. I don't remember if I've already stated this but all classic engines are designed around the most basic of engine principles because they normally run carbs and don't have all the sensors and controllers.
but hey if I'm wrong I'll admit it, its just all that stuff that the old engines don't have cost a ton to get nevermind to get installed correctly and on Ol'd engines that cost could just sky rocket because of all the work needed to convert it over so it is basically a new engine (so you'd be able to convert the car to hydro). But that was all what I understood when i read that sites info. Like I said if I read that wrong, I'll admit it. I got no problems with that.
but hey if I'm wrong I'll admit it, its just all that stuff that the old engines don't have cost a ton to get nevermind to get installed correctly and on Ol'd engines that cost could just sky rocket because of all the work needed to convert it over so it is basically a new engine (so you'd be able to convert the car to hydro). But that was all what I understood when i read that sites info. Like I said if I read that wrong, I'll admit it. I got no problems with that.
#193
No problem, WaveDude. What's great about this thread is that we are all learning something. I could be wrong in what I said too but you and the others here have made me think about something that is very exciting.
I had looked into converting a couple of my vehicles to LP and a lot of that information seemed to apply to hydrogen also. So I just wanted to relay that. Whether it applies or not remains to be seen.
I had looked into converting a couple of my vehicles to LP and a lot of that information seemed to apply to hydrogen also. So I just wanted to relay that. Whether it applies or not remains to be seen.
#194
I see we had a couple of more people vote for "No" and "Maybe"...I can't think of a reason not to use it... :scratch:
Little or no power loss
Renewable
Potential to be very cheap
No emission (not only does that mean less pollution but that also means the end of emission laws)
Since it's still burned you still get an exhaust sound (To tell you the truth, this was my biggest turnoff of Hydro...I want my V8 Rumble...)
Why vote no?
Little or no power loss
Renewable
Potential to be very cheap
No emission (not only does that mean less pollution but that also means the end of emission laws)
Since it's still burned you still get an exhaust sound (To tell you the truth, this was my biggest turnoff of Hydro...I want my V8 Rumble...)
Why vote no?
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#195
I'm people, and I like.
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Decipher+June 10, 2004, 2:03 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Decipher @ June 10, 2004, 2:03 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Robert@June 9, 2004, 4:18 PM
Yet in spite of the clear evidence available all around us, there are many who still do not believe that Global Warming is a problem at all. And it’s no wonder: Because they are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, out of a fear that their profits might be affected if they had to stop dumping so much pollution into the atmosphere.
Yet in spite of the clear evidence available all around us, there are many who still do not believe that Global Warming is a problem at all. And it’s no wonder: Because they are the targets of a massive and well-organized campaign of disinformation lavishly funded by polluters who are determined to prevent any action to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming, out of a fear that their profits might be affected if they had to stop dumping so much pollution into the atmosphere.
![Smile](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
just reposting it to make sure more people read it
#196
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Decipher+June 10, 2004, 2:28 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Decipher @ June 10, 2004, 2:28 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ManEHawke@June 9, 2004, 10:20 PM
Maybe when hydrogen becomes the primary fuel source they will still have some petroleum for sell. Maybe 10 X's as expensive, but i'm sure it won't become 100% gone.
I WILL do everything in my power to someday own a 1969-1970 Boss Mustang. And it will need the precious gasoline.
Maybe when hydrogen becomes the primary fuel source they will still have some petroleum for sell. Maybe 10 X's as expensive, but i'm sure it won't become 100% gone.
I WILL do everything in my power to someday own a 1969-1970 Boss Mustang. And it will need the precious gasoline.
![04](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/04.gif)
I KNOW I can convert it, but I will choose not too. i wouldnt want a fresh exhaust smell out of an all out american classic.
![Drool](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/drool.gif)
![Thumb](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/thumb.gif)
#198
![Talking](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
Originally posted by Spooty@June 10, 2004, 2:17 PM
No problem, WaveDude. What's great about this thread is that we are all learning something. I could be wrong in what I said too but you and the others here have made me think about something that is very exciting.
I had looked into converting a couple of my vehicles to LP and a lot of that information seemed to apply to hydrogen also. So I just wanted to relay that. Whether it applies or not remains to be seen.
No problem, WaveDude. What's great about this thread is that we are all learning something. I could be wrong in what I said too but you and the others here have made me think about something that is very exciting.
I had looked into converting a couple of my vehicles to LP and a lot of that information seemed to apply to hydrogen also. So I just wanted to relay that. Whether it applies or not remains to be seen.
![Crying](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/crying.gif)
Oh and one more thing I'd pay to get a stainless steel exhaust system made custom for it. No NOT STEEL but "stainless steel" because I'd never have to worry about my pipes rusting on me.
![Biggrinjester](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrinjester.gif)
#199
Post *****
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
hey everybody. i was wonderin, u know how H is alot less dense than regular gasoline? would that mean a hydro car would need bigger fuel reserves? or does the combustability (is that even a word) of hydrogen make up for it?
#200
Originally posted by future9er24@June 7, 2004, 9:31 PM
maybe, it all depends on the Hp and performance of the car. if it was just a little lower than the norm, than possibly, but if it has like, no power, no way. does anyone know how much power hydrogen engines make compared to gas?
maybe, it all depends on the Hp and performance of the car. if it was just a little lower than the norm, than possibly, but if it has like, no power, no way. does anyone know how much power hydrogen engines make compared to gas?