2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

leaks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/20/10, 01:19 AM
  #261  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Falcon's not dead. But there's a sizable disagreement among various sources on just what the next-gen Falcon platform, the next Mustang platform, and the future of RWD in Ford's global vehicle lineup will actually look like. We'll just have to wait for some firm information to show up.
Old 11/20/10, 10:52 PM
  #262  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by xlover
I would think a modern clean sheet IRS wont weigh that much more than the SRA.
Its not so much the IRS and its locating hardware as it is the cradle that the IRS attatches to and I dont think you'll find an aluminum or magnesium cradle underpinning the Mustang anytime soon (well that is if Ford still doesn't want to cater to the .000000000000001% of the Mustang community that wants "a cost is no object Mustang GT") Aluminum arms maybe, but in alot of cases a very cost effective and fairly lightweight cast iron or stamped steel part can do the job.


And as far as a Falcon based Mustang, the Falcon is a great car, but unless Ford can carve a sub 3600 lbs two door coupe out of it... no thanks.
Old 11/22/10, 10:59 AM
  #263  
Bullitt Member
 
Eights's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
Its not so much the IRS and its locating hardware as it is the cradle that the IRS attatches to and I dont think you'll find an aluminum or magnesium cradle underpinning the Mustang anytime soon (well that is if Ford still doesn't want to cater to the .000000000000001% of the Mustang community that wants "a cost is no object Mustang GT") Aluminum arms maybe, but in alot of cases a very cost effective and fairly lightweight cast iron or stamped steel part can do the job.

And as far as a Falcon based Mustang, the Falcon is a great car, but unless Ford can carve a sub 3600 lbs two door coupe out of it... no thanks.
bob: Good posting! "Lightweight Cast Iron" was a rock group that sang "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" circa 1960-something.

What material was used by Ford to replace the cracking cast aluminum A-arms on all the '04 Ford GTs? Was it forged aluminum or forged steel? In any case, cutting corners on those A-arms by using castings probably cost Ford every cent of profits ever made on the Ford GTs. Thank God none of those A-arms had broken at high speed before some dealership mechanic spotted the cracks on a Ford GT that was in for a routine check-up--the PR would have been disastrous. Driver & passenger mighta been missing a few essential parts, too...
The marketplace is far less forgiving of those who do something but do it wrong than it is of those who don't do it at all.

What about using the current IRS in Australian Falcons? Be aware that the Holden Commodores used a derivative of the Cadillac Catera's IRS, and most lay the blame for the resurrected GTOs handling ills on that decision (The 3777 lb. GTO got handed its axles in slaloms and figure-eights by the 4266 lb. Charger SRT8--Motor Trend, July 2006. The SRA GT500 stomped the sheet out of both of them in slaloms & figure-eights in that same comparo, BTW.).
Moral: Make sure that any off-the-shelf IRS that gets considered for the next Mustang can convincingly outhandle the Boss 302 Laguna Seca or just forget about it.

Magnesium: A tricky metal. Burns intensely, easily corrodes in water, and may not be weldable at all (see "Burns intensely" upstream in this sentence). Lithium is tricky, too. And carbon fiber can be labor-intensive (Ford did build a few Tauruses with carbon fiber bodies/frames, but they were not optimized for carbon fiber's qualities--Ford essentially just duplicated steel bodies/frames in carbon fiber. It was an experiment to get some experience with carbon fiber as a major component material, and I never read, heard, or saw what became of the experiment).
Moral: There are reasons that aluminum is the preferred alternative metal in the automobile industry...

All this points to the need to make the next Mustang smaller. Let it be Ford of Australia's mission to figure out how to make a viable Falcon out of a smaller Mustang's body/frame. DON'T compromise our Mustang for their Falcon!

Greg "Stand up and be counted!" Ates

Last edited by Eights; 11/22/10 at 11:04 AM.
Old 11/22/10, 12:36 PM
  #264  
GTR Member
 
Twin Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Location: England
Posts: 5,553
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Eights
Moral: Make sure that any off-the-shelf IRS that gets considered for the next Mustang can convincingly outhandle the Boss 302 Laguna Seca or just forget about it.

Greg "Stand up and be counted!" Ates
Agree. Has the SRA in the GT/Boss been honed to perfection now? Certainly it's proved it's metal against the BMW M3, so certainly any IRS Mustang has to at least handle as well as the current GT.

I have full faith in the Australian team, but I'm sure they'll have all the help they need from Team Mustang
Old 11/22/10, 02:26 PM
  #265  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Automagically's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 20, 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
Agree. Has the SRA in the GT/Boss been honed to perfection now? Certainly it's proved it's metal against the BMW M3, so certainly any IRS Mustang has to at least handle as well as the current GT.

I have full faith in the Australian team, but I'm sure they'll have all the help they need from Team Mustang
I would say it's almost as close as it's going to get without putting a Watts link in. Ford will really have to prove its case when moving into an IRA Mustang. It's going to be done so might as well be a good one.
Old 11/22/10, 03:06 PM
  #266  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think its pretty much a foregone conclusion the 2013/2014 redesign will have IRS it is just a question of execution. I think the mustang team and ford will do what they have been doing for the past few years... doing something because it is the right thing for the vehicle line and doing it the best they can. (see examples, 2010 interior redesign, 2011 5.0 V8, 2011 GT500 alum block, 2012 BOSS, etc) not to mention the numerous upgrades on the other vehicles in the lineup. They have left the half assed efforts of the past behind. from them i would expect nothing other than a drag capable (for those who cant stop living a 1/4mi at a time) durable IRS that will out handle the current car on a road course. with all the progress they have made i cant see the engineering team going back to settling for "good enough"
Old 11/22/10, 08:36 PM
  #267  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
I wouldn't see an IRS adding much in terms of overall road holding, but ride comfort and overall handling confidence would benefit the most. While Mustang guys might be used to the 3 link SRA and panhard rod arrangement in the current car, I can see where it would be spooky for somebody used to a modern IRS setup (old Porsche and Bug guys know what I'm talking about there). Although a good watts-link would go a long way toward fixing that behavior if say, Ford was looking into a next gen SRA setup.
Old 11/22/10, 08:39 PM
  #268  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Eights
bob: Good posting! "Lightweight Cast Iron" was a rock group that sang "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" circa 1960-something.


What material was used by Ford to replace the cracking cast aluminum A-arms on all the '04 Ford GTs? Was it forged aluminum or forged steel? In any case, cutting corners on those A-arms by using castings probably cost Ford every cent of profits ever made on the Ford GTs. Thank God none of those A-arms had broken at high speed before some dealership mechanic spotted the cracks on a Ford GT that was in for a routine check-up--the PR would have been disastrous. Driver & passenger mighta been missing a few essential parts, too...
The marketplace is far less forgiving of those who do something but do it wrong than it is of those who don't do it at all.
IIRC the original spec a-arms were roto-cast...err molded.. err whatever and the supplier hadn't propler cleaned the equipment leading to the a-arm failures. Porsche uses the same technology in thier suspension components IIRC. Also I thought the replacement arms were billet?
Old 11/23/10, 05:37 AM
  #269  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
<cough> Iron Butterfly <cough>
Old 11/23/10, 06:31 AM
  #270  
Mach 1 Member
 
Brewman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 14, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the original name of the Song was "In the Garden Of Eden"
Old 11/23/10, 10:16 AM
  #271  
Bullitt Member
 
Eights's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boomer & Brewman:

<cough> Iron Butterfly <cough> I know...
And the original name of the Song was "In the Garden Of Eden" I know that, too...

I've got the vinyl thirty-three-and-a-third album, bought just outside of Oakland back in the day.

One of music's Golden Ages...
Old 11/23/10, 10:43 AM
  #272  
Bullitt Member
 
Eights's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bob

IIRC the original spec a-arms were roto-cast...err molded.. err whatever and the supplier hadn't propler cleaned the equipment leading to the a-arm failures. Porsche uses the same technology in thier suspension components IIRC. Also I thought the replacement arms were billet?
bob: At the time, the articles I read on the web about the DND and the fix stated that the replacement A-arms were forged, and there was a pic of one of the new A-arms and commentary by Jay Leno about how well he thought Ford had handled a very sensitive recall (Ford people sent out trucks to pick up each of the recalled Ford GTs at a place and time convenient to the owners, and returned them by truck once the new components had been installed).

In any case, the sub-contractor in Tennessee pressure-cast them using the techniques used by Porsche to pressure-cast A-arms, but failed to sanitize the molds after each casting which left impurities in the molds that compromised the subsequent A-arms cast in those molds. And those impurities caused the A-arms to start cracking with use.
Moral: Subcontracting is a risk. Do it in-house, and do it well.

The "Do Not Drive" recall caused by a subcontractor screw-up will always be a blemish on the record of the first American production vehicle that could maintain over a football field a second at full wail. That is a damned shame...

Greg "I am still P.O.'d about that" Ates

Last edited by Eights; 11/23/10 at 10:46 AM.
Old 11/23/10, 11:14 AM
  #273  
Bullitt Member
 
Eights's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
Agree. Has the SRA in the GT/Boss been honed to perfection now? Certainly it's proved it's metal against the BMW M3, so certainly any IRS Mustang has to at least handle as well as the current GT.

I have full faith in the Australian team, but I'm sure they'll have all the help they need from Team Mustang
Twin Turbo: No, to be worth it, any IRS Mustang can't settle for being just as good as the current solid rear axle. It's gotta be better--and if it can't convincingly outhandle the Boss 302 Laguna Seca the GM fanboys on the GM websites and the GM apologists on this one will say "Ford blew it--they can't even build an IRS that can beat their own log axle. Haw haw haw! Mustangs suck! Camaros rule! Pfffffttttttttttttt!"
'Know what I mean?

And no, finish the new Mustang exactly as it should be, and then let Ford's Australian designers and engineers adapt it to whatever specs they need for a new Falcon. Once you "cooperate", the next Mustang will be compromised.
I ain't no compromisin' guy.
Compromise is the vehicle that delivers mediocrity to an unsuspecting world. The flabby Camaro is a shortened Zeta Obese chassis, and the oinkin' Challenger is a shortened Charger chassis. Need I say more?

Greg "Somebody's gotta stand up for doing things right. I'm him." Ates
Old 11/24/10, 07:36 AM
  #274  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Even if the IRS carries a bit of weigth penalty its all going to be sprung weight. Unsprung weight is a much larger performance killer then sprung weight.
Old 11/24/10, 02:27 PM
  #275  
V6 Member
 
fmstang68's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 19, 2004
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If I remember correctly, the 2005 Mustang appeared as a concept drawing in Motor Trend in late 2002 or early 2003. Same thing may happen for the 2014.
Old 11/24/10, 04:49 PM
  #276  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by fmstang68
If I remember correctly, the 2005 Mustang appeared as a concept drawing in Motor Trend in late 2002 or early 2003. Same thing may happen for the 2014.
It was suppose to be a 2003.5
Old 11/24/10, 05:12 PM
  #277  
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
bt4's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knight
Even if the IRS carries a bit of weigth penalty its all going to be sprung weight. Unsprung weight is a much larger performance killer then sprung weight.
I don't think weight, sprung, unsprung, or otherwise is the issue. I think Greg "Over the Top" Ates has fairly accurately nailed the issue. If (and it seems likely) the next iteration of the Mustang has an IRS, it cannot be a medicore effort--it cannot just match the current performance of the SRA, it has to better it. Anything else--why bother?
Old 11/28/10, 09:20 PM
  #278  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Eights
bob: At the time, the articles I read on the web about the DND and the fix stated that the replacement A-arms were forged, and there was a pic of one of the new A-arms and commentary by Jay Leno about how well he thought Ford had handled a very sensitive recall (Ford people sent out trucks to pick up each of the recalled Ford GTs at a place and time convenient to the owners, and returned them by truck once the new components had been installed).
Did the article say who handled the new A-arms? I'm curious who did the work, setting up to do limited number of forged A-arms had to be super expensive!

In any case, the sub-contractor in Tennessee pressure-cast them using the techniques used by Porsche to pressure-cast A-arms, but failed to sanitize the molds after each casting which left impurities in the molds that compromised the subsequent A-arms cast in those molds. And those impurities caused the A-arms to start cracking with use.
Moral: Subcontracting is a risk. Do it in-house, and do it well.
Yeah, that was it

The "Do Not Drive" recall caused by a subcontractor screw-up will always be a blemish on the record of the first American production vehicle that could maintain over a football field a second at full wail. That is a damned shame...

Greg "I am still P.O.'d about that" Ates
Agreed, its to bad Ford, GM, et al get dinged for this all the time defintely caveat emptor (well for the car producer anyway).

Originally Posted by bt4
I don't think weight, sprung, unsprung, or otherwise is the issue. I think Greg "Over the Top" Ates has fairly accurately nailed the issue. If (and it seems likely) the next iteration of the Mustang has an IRS, it cannot be a medicore effort--it cannot just match the current performance of the SRA, it has to better it. Anything else--why bother?
I dont disagree, but thats a tall order. In the FOX/SN95 days it would have been relatively easy to do so (and Ford did just that with the Cobra IRS), it terms of road-holding the current 3-link does an excellent job even on fairly bumpy roads. I dont think we will see the sort of improvement going from the S-197 to the next car like we did with the SN95 going to the S-197. Rather going to an IRS in the next car will benefit ride and to some degree interior packaging as one of the lesser known benefits to an IRS is it typically takes less space to operate in compared to an SRA.

Hopefully Ford will nail the launch characteristics like GM did with thier IRS which to me is just as if not more important than an actual increase in road holding or transient repsonse or whatever.

Last edited by bob; 11/28/10 at 09:45 PM.
Old 11/29/10, 11:27 AM
  #279  
Bullitt Member
 
Eights's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Did the article say who handled the new A-arms? I'm curious who did the work, setting up to do limited number of forged A-arms had to be super expensive!"

bob: I just can't recall whether they did or didn't state who may have fabricated the replacement A-Arms--it was four or maybe five years ago now. I agree that it probably cost Ford an A-Arm and a leg (heh heh), and I'm sure it devoured savagely any and all profits that may have resulted from Ford GT sales.

Everything about that episode is sad, except that none of the cracked A-Arms actually broke before they were replaced so no one was injured/maimed/killed as a result.

Greg "I wish I didn't have chronic CRS" Ates
Old 11/29/10, 01:56 PM
  #280  
Team Mustang Source
 
Topnotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Not so much a leak but Fords new PW/DL/Elec. Mirror buttons may end up in the stang...


Quick Reply: leaks



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 AM.