2011 Mustang GT 5.0L Going To The Track and Dyno!
We actually hired/trained two more people that will be active on the forums for us along with Kent because I may be off doing R&D on new stuff!
Fred
Evolution Performance, Inc.
www.evoperform.com
Fred
Evolution Performance, Inc.
www.evoperform.com
We actually hired/trained two more people that will be active on the forums for us along with Kent because I may be off doing R&D on new stuff!
Fred
Evolution Performance, Inc.
www.evoperform.com
Fred
Evolution Performance, Inc.
www.evoperform.com
We actually hired/trained two more people that will be active on the forums for us along with Kent because I may be off doing R&D on new stuff!
Fred
Evolution Performance, Inc.
www.evoperform.com
Fred
Evolution Performance, Inc.
www.evoperform.com
Great for us to hear at least
While true, you can at least get a good feel for crank HP from a dyno. Our modern Mustangs lose about 12% hp from crank to the wheels with a manual trans and about 15% with an auto.
A better performance indicator is trap speeds from the 1/4 mile timeslips. That is based on pure physics (a known weight moved over a known distance at a known terminal velocity).
A better performance indicator is trap speeds from the 1/4 mile timeslips. That is based on pure physics (a known weight moved over a known distance at a known terminal velocity).
I don't know how many of you are on Facebook, but I suggest being a fan of our Page. I will be updating it with all 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V related stuff along with Photos and Videos! It really is the best place to check for our on going updates!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Evolution-Performance-Inc/262882950647
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Evolution-Performance-Inc/262882950647
Then you have to assume the dyno operator knows what they are doing ( rare ) and what correction factor was used.
The only way to know for sure how much loss you will have from the flywheel to the rear wheels is to compare the same engine run on an engine dyno then a chassis dyno. Even that depends upon getting the engine dyno passes setup as close to what you would see on the chassis dyno as possible (mainly accessories and exhaust). Very few have actually done this (chassis dynos easy to do, plentiful, and cheap to use....engine dynos are none of the above).
The % formula's are a decent first guess, but shouldn't be taken as ground truth.
The % formula's are a decent first guess, but shouldn't be taken as ground truth.
The only way to know for sure how much loss you will have from the flywheel to the rear wheels is to compare the same engine run on an engine dyno then a chassis dyno. Even that depends upon getting the engine dyno passes setup as close to what you would see on the chassis dyno as possible (mainly accessories and exhaust). Very few have actually done this (chassis dynos easy to do, plentiful, and cheap to use....engine dynos are none of the above).
The % formula's are a decent first guess, but shouldn't be taken as ground truth.
The % formula's are a decent first guess, but shouldn't be taken as ground truth.
The whole "15%" thing is a bogus # based on what people GUESS from Dynojets. It is accurate to the tune of +/- 25 hp. If a 50 HP range is "close enough" for you then keep doing the 15% thing.
From EP on facebook:
Evolution Performance, Inc. Our Stock 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V weighs 3,824lbs with Driver and a Full Tank of Gas!
Here they are in the staging lanes...waiting...waiting..
Evolution Performance, Inc. Our Stock 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V weighs 3,824lbs with Driver and a Full Tank of Gas!
Here they are in the staging lanes...waiting...waiting..
Last edited by todd03blown; Apr 30, 2010 at 06:06 PM.



