2015 Photoshop/Rendering Thread
#21
Legacy TMS Member
Yep, they are official renderings of the 2010 GT500. The image below was an official rendering of the 2005 GT, my point being that this car actually looks more like the 2010 GT. So, following that theory, there's a small chance that the next gen car may look similar to the 2010 rendering (hope you catch my drift )
#22
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the bottom front angle and the bottom rear angle together would make a killer car.
#24
GTR Member
Thread Starter
Wow, that's impressive. A little too "batmobile" for my liking, but interesting all the same. The full fastback roofline looks great and it's got a great side profile. Not keen on the headlight buckets though.
Keep 'em coming though
Keep 'em coming though
#25
Yep, they are official renderings of the 2010 GT500. The image below was an official rendering of the 2005 GT, my point being that this car actually looks more like the 2010 GT. So, following that theory, there's a small chance that the next gen car may look similar to the 2010 rendering (hope you catch my drift )
If your right here is you 2015 Mustang Everyone
#26
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.idsketching.com/blog/wp-c...ches/must8.jpg This one looks like the unlikely child of a 350Z and a Mustang...
#27
http://www.idsketching.com/blog/wp-c...ches/must8.jpg This one looks like the unlikely child of a 350Z and a Mustang...
#28
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n...g?t=1254397148 I love the bottom one b/c even though there is a good bit of black plastic on the rear bumper, the exhaust makes it not at noticeable. Kind of takes the attention away from the black diaper and puts it on exhaust.
#29
Quite frankly, I don't like very many of these sketches, especially if they proposals for the next generation Mustang. They all look like they're bigger, longer, wider, and heavier. They look like a V6 base model will weigh 4,000 lbs! Its the same mistake made with the 71-73s; trying to be a musclecar when the Mustang is a ponycar.
And can we please get away from the high beltline chopped top Mercury look? Its old already on the Chrylser 300 and one of the big complaints from reviewers about the Camaro (lack of visibility due to the low roof and small windows).
Leave being huge and heavy to the Challenger and Camaro. Make the next gen Mustang smaller & lighter but still leave room for the V8! I want one that is the size of the original '65-66 body. Maybe about the size of the BMW 1 series coupe, which is a bit shorter.
And can we please get away from the high beltline chopped top Mercury look? Its old already on the Chrylser 300 and one of the big complaints from reviewers about the Camaro (lack of visibility due to the low roof and small windows).
Leave being huge and heavy to the Challenger and Camaro. Make the next gen Mustang smaller & lighter but still leave room for the V8! I want one that is the size of the original '65-66 body. Maybe about the size of the BMW 1 series coupe, which is a bit shorter.
Last edited by Vermillion06; 10/7/09 at 03:53 PM.
#31
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite frankly, I don't like very many of these sketches, especially if they proposals for the next generation Mustang. They all look like they're bigger, longer, wider, and heavier. They look like a V6 base model will weigh 4,000 lbs! Its the same mistake made with the 71-73s; trying to be a musclecar when the Mustang is a ponycar.
And can we please get away from the high beltline chopped top Mercury look? Its old already on the Chrylser 300 and one of the big complaints from reviewers about the Camaro (lack of visibility due to the low roof and small windows).
Leave being huge and heavy to the Challenger and Camaro. Make the next gen Mustang smaller & lighter but still leave room for the V8! I want one that is the size of the original '65-66 body. Maybe about the size of the BMW 1 series coupe, which is a bit shorter.
And can we please get away from the high beltline chopped top Mercury look? Its old already on the Chrylser 300 and one of the big complaints from reviewers about the Camaro (lack of visibility due to the low roof and small windows).
Leave being huge and heavy to the Challenger and Camaro. Make the next gen Mustang smaller & lighter but still leave room for the V8! I want one that is the size of the original '65-66 body. Maybe about the size of the BMW 1 series coupe, which is a bit shorter.
The slab-sided chopped top look is way passe anymore. Besides, if I wanted to feel like I was sitting in a dark gun bunker, I'd go sit in a dark gun bunker. The Camaro seems to be the illogical extreme of this styling trend and has been duly panned for the resultant horrible outward visibility.
Rather than seeing the 201X Stang plump out like a fat man at a fixed price buffet, I'd rather see the Stang return to its slimmer, trimmer, leaner roots ala the '65 fastback with its lean, low body and airy greenhouse. These are pony cars, not Clydesdales, and ought to be sized and weighted accordingly. Ford should adopt a strict box rule when penning the next Stang: not an inch beyond the dimensions of the '65 fastback and within 200lbs. The Stang should be a trim performance car, not a bloated blunderbuss.
I attribute a lot of the car bloat of the last two decades more to a lack of engineering focus and discipline as much as stricter safety standards and equipment lists. Its an easy recourse for the design team simply to take an a la carte approach to satisfying consumer wants and regulatory demands than to practice real engineering and design rigor.
Last edited by rhumb; 10/7/09 at 04:34 PM.
#32
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O, rather, just make it a few inches lower to attain the same proportions, with the added benefits of reduced weight and drag, and a lowered CG, all big positives for a performance car.
#33
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with making it smaller, is Ford runs the risk of lose customers due to people not fitting in the car. When I had my '07, I fit in like a glove. Perfect fit. Any smaller though, would have made it kind of uncomfortable. When I owned the '00 though, it was almost WAY too small for me. If it wasn't a vert, I don't know how I would have fit in there.
#34
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with making it smaller, is Ford runs the risk of lose customers due to people not fitting in the car. When I had my '07, I fit in like a glove. Perfect fit. Any smaller though, would have made it kind of uncomfortable. When I owned the '00 though, it was almost WAY too small for me. If it wasn't a vert, I don't know how I would have fit in there.
#36
Green sketch is awesome!
This is what Ford needs to be doing. Coming out with a completely bad *** aggressive design. That green sketch is what the car needs. I don't know what it is about Ford, but they are generally way too conservative on their final designs. Although apperently from what I've read, the 2005 concept car was an afterthought to the already designed Mustang. Personally, I loved the concept and still do, better than the 2006 GT I have. Ford needs to make the car look deadly modern and sleek. The concept had that in spades. Although to Ford's credit, they did redesign the front correctly on the new model and give it a more aggressive look, but the rear taillights, UGH! There's just something about the car now that needs a shot of adrenaline. I can't put my finger on it, but I look at the current Mustang and I'm like, "this is the car you parents or grandparents drove". Then I look at that green sketch and that sucker is just plain mean and modern. Aggreesive front attitude and that big rear hip with a huge tire under it. I love it!
#38
GTR Member
Thread Starter
The problem with the green one, for me, is it's lost most of the Mustang styling cues. Yes, it's a great looking car, but not a great looking Mustang.
That's why I like the pencil sketches, agressive yes, Mustang styling cues yes!
That's why I like the pencil sketches, agressive yes, Mustang styling cues yes!
#39
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would love to see a more aggressive hip along with other curves, but the thing that's always been my favorite thing about the mustang over the years, is between one generation to another, there hasn't been any monumental changes. Each remodel looks somewhat like the last and I think it's done very well for Ford over the years.
#40
This is what Ford needs to be doing. Coming out with a completely bad *** aggressive design. That green sketch is what the car needs. I don't know what it is about Ford, but they are generally way too conservative on their final designs. Although apperently from what I've read, the 2005 concept car was an afterthought to the already designed Mustang. Personally, I loved the concept and still do, better than the 2006 GT I have. Ford needs to make the car look deadly modern and sleek. The concept had that in spades. Although to Ford's credit, they did redesign the front correctly on the new model and give it a more aggressive look, but the rear taillights, UGH! There's just something about the car now that needs a shot of adrenaline. I can't put my finger on it, but I look at the current Mustang and I'm like, "this is the car you parents or grandparents drove". Then I look at that green sketch and that sucker is just plain mean and modern. Aggreesive front attitude and that big rear hip with a huge tire under it. I love it!