2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Interior pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #101  
HateBreeder's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 12, 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Its seems that ford are leaking the pics for our feed back !
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #102  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by stangsimon
It is also an early development mule with ungrained, uncolored parts. Remember the ones with the guy in sunglasses, driving with the cellphone? That had the aluminum dash panels.

Trust me, these are not the final colors or final materials. It will trash Camaro and Challenger ( and Genesis too. )



You are absolutely right good sir!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #103  
watchdevil's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2008
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
Originally Posted by stangsimon
It is also an early development mule with ungrained, uncolored parts. Remember the ones with the guy in sunglasses, driving with the cellphone? That had the aluminum dash panels.

Trust me, these are not the final colors or final materials. It will trash Camaro and Challenger ( and Genesis too. )



I have been wondering if the square between the center dash vents is really a concealed 12V power outlet convenient for radar detectors...

The dash will certainly look better with the silver IUP trim...

I wonder what the auto shifter will look like?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #104  
05mach1's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 5
From: Hurricane,wv/Cinn,OH,Mooresville,NC
Originally Posted by stangsimon
It is also an early development mule with ungrained, uncolored parts. Remember the ones with the guy in sunglasses, driving with the cellphone? That had the aluminum dash panels.

Trust me, these are not the final colors or final materials. It will trash Camaro and Challenger ( and Genesis too. )



I like it, it looks like Sonic Blue is coming back?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #105  
Starfleet007's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 3, 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Middle TN
Originally Posted by watchdevil
Well I like the new interior is nice enough. I appreciate the upgraded materials, soft touch surfaces, better fit and finish with more complete trim.

However I would miss the character of my big chrome ringed round vents and gauge cluster too much to do without them.

So there is nothing about the 2010 that makes me wish I waited for it. Nothing is saying I gotta have it or that I regret buying my 08. If anything I am relieved that my 08 has an appeal that will never be obsolete.
I totally agree with you!!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #106  
Starfleet007's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 3, 2008
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Middle TN
Originally Posted by gnat-sum
You are correct- that is the base interior- these are the IUPs- looks like we keep the aluminum dash panels and the cool new wheel w/ audio controls. It will look sweet. My friend tells me the dash is soft and cushy unlike the cheap plastic from today.







If you see the center of the guy's driving wheel, its a cobra emblem.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #107  
gnat-sum's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 24, 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Starfleet007
If you see the center of the guy's driving wheel, its a cobra emblem.
I wouldn't put too much stock in that. When they are doing developmental testing, they'll use whatever parts they have so long as its functionally the same. The horse vs. cobra badge wouldn't make a difference in performance drives. They just need a steering wheel, grabbed one and put it on.

Also, today's Mustang has the base ( black ), IUP ( alum ) and Shelby ( really dark alum ) so I don't see them pushing the bright alum dash up to Shelby and leaving the regular Mustang w/ nothing.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #108  
429 Boss Mustang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 12, 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
when i get this car im not gonna let no kids rid in it lol
i had a truck and its outside looked good but the inside was total rubbish because my lit bro and sis kicked everything and threw stuff :/
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #109  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by stangsimon
...( and Genesis too. )
Those cars don't count...
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 04:29 AM
  #110  
SINBUSTER007's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 16, 2007
Posts: 621
Likes: 12
From: Hagerstown, MD
was at a car show saturday and took this pict of the interior of a
1968 GT/CS. with people saying the new interior looks more modern,
i would have to disagree with them and say its more like original.
Attached Thumbnails Interior pics!-68-gtcs-interior.jpg   Interior pics!-untitled.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #111  
stangsimon's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by WaltM
Those cars don't count...
By those, I assume you mean the Hyundai Genesis coupe. A rear drive 200 HP -300 HP sports coupe doing it on 2 less cylinders per HP rating in these times of fuel economy-minded shopping certainly does count, especially on the eastern, west and southern coasts where the Buy American feeling is not as deeply rooted as in the Midwest. There will always be the diehard Mustang fans ( like me ), but we tend toward GTs. The Mustang needs volume to survive, and that means moving V6s. The Hyundai w/ its 10 yr warranty and feeling that Fords are old technology unreliable cars in the import heavy coasts certainly can take a bite out of V6 sales.

The 350/370Z is relevant as well, but on the higher end of the GT price scale.

And this is exactly why the Mustang must be updated and modernized in appearance and technology depsite some here feeling it should continue w/ unchanged styling, and manual steering.

If you really want a car with the same styling and technology as a 1965-70 Mustang, then you should take your $30,000 and buy a nice $25,000 classic Mustang and spend the other $5,000 on a beater.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 08:54 AM
  #112  
stangsimon's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SINBUSTER007
was at a car show saturday and took this pict of the interior of a
1968 GT/CS. with people saying the new interior looks more modern,
i would have to disagree with them and say its more like original.
+1

I think its a modern version of the 1967-68 original. A very nice update, especially if it has the upgraded materials everyone is talking about!!!

Certainly better than the disjointed pregnant Camaro and the ugly "lifted-from-Magnum" Challenger.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #113  
Wolfsburg's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SINBUSTER007
was at a car show saturday and took this pict of the interior of a
1968 GT/CS. with people saying the new interior looks more modern,
i would have to disagree with them and say its more like original.
Agreed 100%

I really don't understand the comments stating the old interior was more "retro" and the new interior is more "modern". It is really puzzling how one can say that the new interior isn't retro enough when it is such a close representation of the interior of the '67-'68 Mustangs. Maybe they have never actually seen the interior of a vintage Mustang?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 05:00 PM
  #114  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by stangsimon
By those, I assume you mean the Hyundai Genesis coupe. A rear drive 200 HP -300 HP sports coupe doing it on 2 less cylinders per HP rating in these times of fuel economy-minded shopping certainly does count, especially on the eastern, west and southern coasts where the Buy American feeling is not as deeply rooted as in the Midwest. There will always be the diehard Mustang fans ( like me ), but we tend toward GTs. The Mustang needs volume to survive, and that means moving V6s. The Hyundai w/ its 10 yr warranty and feeling that Fords are old technology unreliable cars in the import heavy coasts certainly can take a bite out of V6 sales.

The 350/370Z is relevant as well, but on the higher end of the GT price scale.

And this is exactly why the Mustang must be updated and modernized in appearance and technology depsite some here feeling it should continue w/ unchanged styling, and manual steering.
Those cars are different. They're either an import take on an american car, (Genesis) or a poor-man's Porsche (350Z). Outside of price, neither can be directly compaired without concessions. I also believe that a Mustang buyer wouldn't consider these cars as an option.

Originally Posted by stangsimon
If you really want a car with the same styling and technology as a 1965-70 Mustang, then you should take your $30,000 and buy a nice $25,000 classic Mustang and spend the other $5,000 on a beater.
I don't know where you got the idea that I'm in love w/retro. You may want to review the thread and express your opinion to the appropriate party.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #115  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by WaltM
Those cars are different. They're either an import take on an american car, (Genesis) or a poor-man's Porsche (350Z). Outside of price, neither can be directly compaired without concessions. I also believe that a Mustang buyer wouldn't consider these cars as an option.
Ford was probably saying that 30 years ago too. Now, Toyota has over-taken them and the company is in panic mode.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #116  
stangsimon's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by WaltM
Those cars are different. They're either an import take on an american car, (Genesis) or a poor-man's Porsche (350Z). Outside of price, neither can be directly compaired without concessions. I also believe that a Mustang buyer wouldn't consider these cars as an option.
No, a die-hard Mustang enthusiast will always buy a Mustang, but not everyone who purchases a Mustang is a "Mustang buyer". In locations where there's an import-heavy dominance, many non-Mustang buyers view it simply as Ford's entrant in the sporty coupe segment, not the dominate kick a$$ pi$$-on-Camaro original musclecar. If they are looking for a sporty coupe, they'll shop V6 Mustang, Camaro, maybe a used Z, and Genesis. This is why we can't lose our chance to get conquest sales for Mustang. There are only so many Mustang enthusiasts, if we don't pull in people from the fringe of the sporty car segment, the enthusiast pool will be saturated and sales will fall. You can see that in 2005 and 2006, sales were high, then they dropped as the market was saturated.

I don't know where you got the idea that I'm in love w/retro. You may want to review the thread and express your opinion to the appropriate party.
Sorry I meant this as a general statement to those who want the 2010 to be exactly like the 2005 or 1968,etc etc.- not to you directly. My sincere apologies.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #117  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by max2000jp
Ford was probably saying that 30 years ago too. Now, Toyota has over-taken them and the company is in panic mode.
So how hard is Ford hit w/the current Tiberon? That's what the Genesis is replacing. Ok, so they may lose some Focus sales to a younger segment.
Originally Posted by stangsimon
No, a die-hard Mustang enthusiast will always buy a Mustang, but not everyone who purchases a Mustang is a "Mustang buyer".
True. A "Mustang guy" isn't the same as a "guy with a Mustang". I work w/a guy that swears his old '87 GT was the best car he ever owned. Now he drives an Accord (so much for loyalty).

Maybe Hyundai isn't tageting the 'stang at all. Maybe they're looking to take sales from Nissan and Honda.

I see the Genesis being more of a threat to the 350-70/Scion/S2000/WRX/Mitsu segment. I have more concerns over Camaro/Challenger, and am amazed at how many people are ready to abandon the blue oval over them.

Last edited by WaltM; Sep 14, 2008 at 06:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #118  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Originally Posted by WaltM
Those cars are different. They're either an import take on an american car, (Genesis) or a poor-man's Porsche (350Z).
I've been following the Genesis and I don't believe it's an "import take on an american car." The Genesis is more of a luxury jap/euro car clone, trying to take the best features of the 5-series, Lexus GS, Mercedes E-class, etc, that costs alot less. (http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...00-genesis.jpg)

I feel like the Genesis Coupe was more of an afterthought - hey, we have a great RWD 300-400hp platform, lets make a sporty coupe out of this.

And I'm not sure what's going to happen to the Tiburon, but the Genesis Coupe isn't going to replace it. The Tiburon is in the integra/rsx/solara/civic/focus/cobalt/etc cheap FWD "sporty" car segment..

Import take on an american car.. hmph. Self centered americans. (jk.. I was born here)
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 06:40 PM
  #119  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by WaltM
So how hard is Ford hit w/the current Tiberon? That's what the Genesis is replacing. Ok, so they may lose some Focus sales to a younger segment.
We shall see. The Genesis looks like it's going to be a competitive car. Competition is good for us. Ford will have to build a better Mustang or lose market share. In other models, they've lost market share to the imports.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #120  
429 Boss Mustang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 12, 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
i think this one looks better than the camaros
i think the camaros interior looks too plain
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.