Max NA Horsepower
9/29/08, 02:05 PM
#61
Bullitt Member
Join Date: October 8, 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We're really talking the whole kit, or I was under the impression, I had to swap cranks for this kit because the journal size is different for minimal clearance issues. I've never seen a 4.6 crank failure though, i've seen just about anything else under the sun but usually only happens when someone's doing something stupid or using the wrong part for an application
By the way got these over the weekend, first dyno run max 378@rear, get my new sheets up when I get them.
By the way got these over the weekend, first dyno run max 378@rear, get my new sheets up when I get them.
Take a look at the dyno of that saleen, why do the two look so different?
9/29/08, 02:11 PM
#62
I don't do trannies
or rear-ends anymore!
or rear-ends anymore!
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would like to be able to tell you but I can't, could be the difference in the dyno's? And the rods are rated at well over a 1000 with the arp bolt upgrade I have, I doubt i'll ever be pushing that in this car though.
And nice Saleen man
And nice Saleen man
9/29/08, 02:20 PM
#63
Bullitt Member
Join Date: October 8, 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They may be. hell they may be just fine at 1000hp, I would run a better rod for anything over 750 but thats just me.
9/29/08, 02:22 PM
#64
I don't do trannies
or rear-ends anymore!
or rear-ends anymore!
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
9/29/08, 02:46 PM
#65
Bullitt Member
Join Date: October 8, 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
9/29/08, 02:49 PM
#66
I don't do trannies
or rear-ends anymore!
or rear-ends anymore!
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If this rod lets go i'll give you my car 
I have faith in it, i've seen the stuff tested against things 3x the cost and out live them, but everyone's entitled to their opinion
I have faith in it, i've seen the stuff tested against things 3x the cost and out live them, but everyone's entitled to their opinion
9/30/08, 02:40 PM
#69
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL coming from someone that has worked at eagle, that's laughable. Do you get the guys coffee? The strength differences in the h-beam vs i-beam have been argued since moses built the ark. The difference is negligible if it's even different at all. And a billet i-beam is going to be much, much stronger than a forged h-beam.
9/30/08, 02:44 PM
#70
I don't do trannies
or rear-ends anymore!
or rear-ends anymore!
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL coming from someone that has worked at eagle, that's laughable. Do you get the guys coffee? The strength differences in the h-beam vs i-beam have been argued since moses built the ark. The difference is negligible if it's even different at all. And a billet i-beam is going to be much, much stronger than a forged h-beam.
11/20/12, 12:20 AM
#71
Member
Join Date: April 13, 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went to a local speed shop and the mechanic had his fox body in there with a 408 stroker that was putting 608hp and 570ft/lbs o torque to the flywheel. Granite he had a 740 lift solid roller cam in it but they will be building the same exact motor that runs on e85 for me in the near future and yes he was n/a.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post