GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Journal: MY American Racing LT Header install, day by day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/12/07, 09:59 PM
  #141  
GT Member
 
LAK3RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that Dynojets usually put out higher numbers? The Mustang Dyno's usually put out more exact numbers that you are putting down ie lower RWHP/RWTQ...
Old 6/12/07, 10:07 PM
  #142  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ya the dynojet should have put out more than the mustang dyno unless the MD was calibrated different.
Old 6/12/07, 10:18 PM
  #143  
GT Member
 
LAK3RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm...Yeah, thats kind of weird...
Old 6/12/07, 11:18 PM
  #144  
Cobra Member
 
SlamMan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah Jim I was just as shocked with your results as everyone else, but I wouldn't get too caught up in the numbers. Like Scott said, you should head out to the track and see what it runs, and as long as you are happy thats all that matters. And just for the record your stang had the sweetest sound of the bunch!
Old 6/13/07, 06:27 AM
  #145  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Lowe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Matt!! Knowing how well it sounds makes the disappointing #s a little easier to swallow. At least it's an honest to goodness 300rwhp car.

Anyone have a twin screw they want to part with? Doesn't look like N/A is gonna get me close to the 350 mark.
Old 6/13/07, 08:13 AM
  #146  
Bullitt Member
 
SP_51-F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlamMan02
Yeah Jim I was just as shocked with your results as everyone else, but I wouldn't get too caught up in the numbers. Like Scott said, you should head out to the track and see what it runs, and as long as you are happy thats all that matters. And just for the record your stang had the sweetest sound of the bunch!
Yeah, don't get wrapped around the dyno # axle. Let's cruise to the track some night to get the real numbers.

And yes, you're car sounds bad @s$!!
I still plan to go with LT's just for that. I might wait a little longer now.
Old 6/13/07, 08:20 AM
  #147  
Mach 1 Member
 
superman112's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 12, 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is strange.. what were the weather conditions like?? was it hotter yesterday then when you dynoed it last time? I'm sure that "may" play a role too. Just like everyone has said.. numbers are just numbers.. I'm sure it sounds awesome.
Old 6/13/07, 09:42 AM
  #148  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Lowe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weather conditions. It was an indoor shop so there was some A/C action. In the shop, dyno temp was 86*, humidity 26%.

What gets me is the headers didn't do anything more that a cattless H-pipe.

CR at TillmanSpeed as already called me this morning. Must have been 8:30am his time. He estimates at least another 10 rwhp with some spark and fuel adjustments. Thanks to the folks at CentralTexasStangs.com for helping me out and getting the datalogging to work. That info was useful.

So another tune is on it's way. I'll get it loaded up and see what happens. Anyone ready for another dyno day!
Old 6/13/07, 09:50 AM
  #149  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From dyno numbers other members have posted with similar mods, I think 310-315 is right about where you should be. Add cams and you are at 340-345. Get the GT500 TB after cams. Then you have 350rwhp.
Old 6/13/07, 09:55 AM
  #150  
Mach 1 Member
 
superman112's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 12, 2004
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
glad CR called and is gonna help you...hope it does make a difference.
Old 6/13/07, 09:56 AM
  #151  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1
Old 6/13/07, 11:54 AM
  #152  
Team Mustang Source
 
05fordgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 19, 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
At least CR called you, I'm STILL waiting for him to email me my updated tune! (and I've asked him numerous times to do so, and given him my email address) Come on CR, send me the fixed tune so I can run your tune, and not have to worry about the CEL coming on.
Old 6/13/07, 01:40 PM
  #153  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lowe!
Weather conditions. It was an indoor shop so there was some A/C action. In the shop, dyno temp was 86*, humidity 26%.

What gets me is the headers didn't do anything more that a cattless H-pipe.

CR at TillmanSpeed as already called me this morning. Must have been 8:30am his time. He estimates at least another 10 rwhp with some spark and fuel adjustments. Thanks to the folks at CentralTexasStangs.com for helping me out and getting the datalogging to work. That info was useful.

So another tune is on it's way. I'll get it loaded up and see what happens. Anyone ready for another dyno day!

When you were talking about the metallic sound that your not sure about,does it sound anything like this?
YouTube - 06 Mustang
Old 6/13/07, 01:44 PM
  #154  
Member
 
DougMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lowe!
Well here are the results from the dyno run.
Read 'em and weep...........in sorrow with me.


You can see the mods in the sig. A little disappointing to me.
At least the headers sound good.

FYI, there were 2 other stangs that dyno'd after me. For comparison, here is roughly their info:

Stang 1:
-06 Mustang GT manual
-Demolet CAI, Bama 87 oct tune, moto UDPs, CMCV DPs, cattless H-pipe, Pypes over axle and tail pipe (loud SOB).
-A/F mid to low 13s thru out run.
-300HP/317TQ

Stang 2:
-06 Mustang GT manual
-JLT CAI, Bama 93 oct tune, CMCV DPs, cattless H-pipe, don't remember the axle backs.
-A/F low 13.2 to 12.8
-301HP/318TQ

Looks like loosing the cats is as effective for making power as adding LT headers!?!

So what do you think?
This is my run I'm Stang #1

Old 6/13/07, 02:08 PM
  #155  
Cobra Member
 
officespace56's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2007
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lowe!
Thanks Matt!! Knowing how well it sounds makes the disappointing #s a little easier to swallow. At least it's an honest to goodness 300rwhp car.

Anyone have a twin screw they want to part with? Doesn't look like N/A is gonna get me close to the 350 mark.



WHIPPLE! WHIPPLE! WHIPPLE!
Old 6/13/07, 02:23 PM
  #156  
Cobra Member
 
SlamMan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jim- If you go with Saleen, you can keep your current intake! And its twin screw aswell.
Old 6/13/07, 02:54 PM
  #157  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Lowe!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlamMan02
Jim- If you go with Saleen, you can keep your current intake! And its twin screw aswell.
Oh yeah! I've been looking around today. I like the twin screws:

Don't think I like the idea of $5,100+ for a "basic" 3.5 or 4 psi supercharger right now. Anyone have a used one?!? Naw, but seriously, it will be at least early 2008 (read warranty ends) before I'm ready to either go cams/heads or S/C. I'm not loosing the headers now, so a turbo is out, and I'm just not a big fan of the centris. I suppose there is always nitrous, but it scares me a bit.
Old 6/13/07, 03:10 PM
  #158  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a good idea not to do nitrous with the Racer intake cause if the nitrous backs up it will shred the Racer up since its plastic.
Old 6/13/07, 06:25 PM
  #159  
Cobra Member
 
SlamMan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lowe!
Oh yeah! I've been looking around today. I like the twin screws:

Don't think I like the idea of $5,100+ for a "basic" 3.5 or 4 psi supercharger right now. Anyone have a used one?!? Naw, but seriously, it will be at least early 2008 (read warranty ends) before I'm ready to either go cams/heads or S/C. I'm not loosing the headers now, so a turbo is out, and I'm just not a big fan of the centris. I suppose there is always nitrous, but it scares me a bit.
Sounds like the Roush blower could be a good idea? Maintains factory warranty, but you do have to keep the stock pully - Though you should be able to hit 360-370 to the wheels.


And Ive never heard anything about not using Nitrous with the Racer CAI, but who knows - Im not a big nitrous junkie.
Old 6/13/07, 06:39 PM
  #160  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matt did the Metallic LS1 sound you described sound anything like the video I posted?


Quick Reply: Journal: MY American Racing LT Header install, day by day



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM.