Your BOSS moment of the day
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
I ♥ Sausage





Joined: April 4, 2007
Posts: 20,164
Likes: 643
From: Just outside the middle of nowhere
....
So we all know the boss is made for handling. But how much of an advantage does it have over a PP equipped shelby? I haven't driven one but its supposed to be pretty stout and worlds apart from the stock 07-09. Weight distribution is still a problem but I have heard that the spring rate and shock tuning handle it pretty well.
Roger
Roger
So we all know the boss is made for handling. But how much of an advantage does it have over a PP equipped shelby? I haven't driven one but its supposed to be pretty stout and worlds apart from the stock 07-09. Weight distribution is still a problem but I have heard that the spring rate and shock tuning handle it pretty well.
Roger
Roger
I'm curious as well. I'm guessing the gap will widen for the Boss after about 5 laps due to heat soak....
That will be interesting as well because in 2011 they upgraded the intercooler and charge temps are a lot less with much less heatsoak. It is also supposed to be worlds apart. I wonder if they will update it again when the new power levels hit.
Roger
Roger
Not sure, the gearing should be equal. Btw the 2012 has 550 hp not 505. I am sure it was a typo as this proves your point even more
. Power to weight is huge here. Did you guys stay dead even? I really am interested in this as my next purchase will be one or the other. If ford brings the boss with a shaker next year I am inclined to seal the deal. I had a mach 1 and loved the shaker. My problem is that the 500 is built so stoutly you can pretty much throw anything at it and when the next model comes out it will see a substantial bump in hp. As mentioned in the tuning thread I really think ford is trying to keep the "mod money" in house by offering higher hp applications from the factory.
Roger
. Power to weight is huge here. Did you guys stay dead even? I really am interested in this as my next purchase will be one or the other. If ford brings the boss with a shaker next year I am inclined to seal the deal. I had a mach 1 and loved the shaker. My problem is that the 500 is built so stoutly you can pretty much throw anything at it and when the next model comes out it will see a substantial bump in hp. As mentioned in the tuning thread I really think ford is trying to keep the "mod money" in house by offering higher hp applications from the factory.Roger
Not sure, the gearing should be equal. Btw the 2012 has 550 hp not 505. I am sure it was a typo as this proves your point even more
. Power to weight is huge here. Did you guys stay dead even? I really am interested in this as my next purchase will be one or the other. If ford brings the boss with a shaker next year I am inclined to seal the deal. I had a mach 1 and loved the shaker. My problem is that the 500 is built so stoutly you can pretty much throw anything at it and when the next model comes out it will see a substantial bump in hp. As mentioned in the tuning thread I really think ford is trying to keep the "mod money" in house by offering higher hp applications from the factory.
Roger
. Power to weight is huge here. Did you guys stay dead even? I really am interested in this as my next purchase will be one or the other. If ford brings the boss with a shaker next year I am inclined to seal the deal. I had a mach 1 and loved the shaker. My problem is that the 500 is built so stoutly you can pretty much throw anything at it and when the next model comes out it will see a substantial bump in hp. As mentioned in the tuning thread I really think ford is trying to keep the "mod money" in house by offering higher hp applications from the factory.Roger
We stayed even as long as I was willing to test it on a public road so to really know you'd have to test on a track. That said on most road courses you're never going to hit the cars top speed so it's more about how available is the torque . From what I could gather from that brief experiment I'd trade the extra 106 crank hp for the balance of the Boss. The Boss' gearing and trans ratios are optimized for the road course as well. Check the trans ratios on the MT-82 vs the T6060.
Last edited by cloud9; Jul 3, 2011 at 10:10 AM.
Sorry I missed it. Have a link, I would like to be in on the joke
. Anyway I know that 6th is the real difference and with a roots type super charger in place the torque advantage is to the shelby. Its just got the extra girth to contend with. The other thing is the redline is obviously higher in the boss which should equate to less shifting in the twisties. In my mach I could stay in third which was nice. The rpm is much lower on the shelby so that is a distinct disadvantage for road coarse but not for quarter mile which is what the shelby's trans ratio's are optimized for. I am worried about the mt-82 given all the recent problems. It harkens back to the shifting/synchro's on the TR 3650.
Roger
. Anyway I know that 6th is the real difference and with a roots type super charger in place the torque advantage is to the shelby. Its just got the extra girth to contend with. The other thing is the redline is obviously higher in the boss which should equate to less shifting in the twisties. In my mach I could stay in third which was nice. The rpm is much lower on the shelby so that is a distinct disadvantage for road coarse but not for quarter mile which is what the shelby's trans ratio's are optimized for. I am worried about the mt-82 given all the recent problems. It harkens back to the shifting/synchro's on the TR 3650.Roger
Sorry I missed it. Have a link, I would like to be in on the joke
. Anyway I know that 6th is the real difference and with a roots type super charger in place the torque advantage is to the shelby. Its just got the extra girth to contend with. The other thing is the redline is obviously higher in the boss which should equate to less shifting in the twisties. In my mach I could stay in third which was nice. The rpm is much lower on the shelby so that is a distinct disadvantage for road coarse but not for quarter mile which is what the shelby's trans ratio's are optimized for. I am worried about the mt-82 given all the recent problems. It harkens back to the shifting/synchro's on the TR 3650.
Roger
. Anyway I know that 6th is the real difference and with a roots type super charger in place the torque advantage is to the shelby. Its just got the extra girth to contend with. The other thing is the redline is obviously higher in the boss which should equate to less shifting in the twisties. In my mach I could stay in third which was nice. The rpm is much lower on the shelby so that is a distinct disadvantage for road coarse but not for quarter mile which is what the shelby's trans ratio's are optimized for. I am worried about the mt-82 given all the recent problems. It harkens back to the shifting/synchro's on the TR 3650.Roger
https://themustangsource.com/f813/wh...96106/index11/The GT500 is 1:1 in 4th and it's 1:1 in 5th in the Boss, etc.
The joke starts at post #206
https://themustangsource.com/f813/wh...96106/index11/
The GT500 is 1:1 in 4th and it's 1:1 in 5th in the Boss, etc.
https://themustangsource.com/f813/wh...96106/index11/The GT500 is 1:1 in 4th and it's 1:1 in 5th in the Boss, etc.
Reality is in a quarter mile if you aren't shifting into fourth until the stripe (in which case you will usually want a more agressive gear and hold onto third) so I look at the first three, which the shelby is a little more agressive on. Thank you for the intelligent conversation. That is why I have been a member here so long. The passion, the knowledge, and of course the company 
Roger
So the question I have is: is the new Boss motor capable of 600+RWHP on a stock long block and still hold up road racing? By means of forced induction of course. Has anyone seen any articles or builds on them yet?
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
I ♥ Sausage





Joined: April 4, 2007
Posts: 20,164
Likes: 643
From: Just outside the middle of nowhere
Originally Posted by Rather B.Blown
Of course, there is nothing that the Boss can't do, haven't you read the hundreds of threads on here? Its the single greatest car that has ever rolled on the street. The reason people are having to wait so long to get them is because Jesus and the Pope only have 2 days a week when they can get together to build them.

Really would like to see and 11:1 compression motor hold up to 10+ psi. though.
Originally Posted by Rather B.Blown
Of course, there is nothing that the Boss can't do, haven't you read the hundreds of threads on here? Its the single greatest car that has ever rolled on the street. The reason people are having to wait so long to get them is because Jesus and the Pope only have 2 days a week when they can get together to build them.

Jesus rides shotgun in all the new Bosses. And the Dahli Lamma rides in the LS. 12th son of the Lamma. I think Satan rides with me. Always trying to get me in trouble and making me push it until I lose control. Plastic Jesus please keep this thing on the road.


