It the engine issues and two replaced fuel rails that had me looking domestic in the first place.

 

Personally I think the Stang should be a 4 Series fighter, for less coin being a domestic. As for a 3 series fighter give me a manual turbo Fusion.

 

Well, AMGs should be compared to SVTs or Saleens.
But the car I'm talking was a SL V8 and the V6 Firebird sounded way better! Some guys that were around and were not very car savy even asked if the firebird was a V8 because it sounded much tougher and bigger than the puny sounding SL V8.

As to the turbo, to each his own. There's a reason a Lamborghini doesn't have a turbo. It does not need it. Turbos were designed to compensate for lack of power.

 

Well, this is obviously a matter of taste and opinion. I prefer the way a GT500 sounds than a Ferrari V8 for example. If you like how F1 cars sound you would probably like the thinner and screaming sound of a Ferrari. I prefer the growl of an American V8.

 

Oh, so this is how we are defining different opinions now? If somebody has a different opinion than you, he has to be drunk? Mature, are we?

The latest gen M3s are V8. But till 2006 they were inline 6 and sounded like the puny cars they were. The new M3s sound nice and as I said, if you like the thin V8 sound you will like it. But yes, when you just start up and the engine is in idle, I think a Firebird or Mustang V6 can still sound better. Reving and driving may be a different story. But a M3 V8 or not has nothing on a Mustang GT or Vette in the sound department!

 

Twins look right at home on the Ford GT . . . .



And on the Cobra-Jet Mustang Concept by FMC . . .



http://www.autoblog.com/2012/10/30/f...ncept-w-video/

 

Euro V8 = 180* crank vs American V8 = 90* crank.

 

An 8.3 Whipple would look even better!

 

Lol...that comes with the new 901d option - hood delete

 

Good thing the Mustang isn't a muscle car anymore. As far as the turbo thing, . People use turbos because they make an insane amount of power (especially on 5.0's) and they're efficient. If they're not your thing so be it but to say they don't belong on a Mustang is just ridiculous.

 

I wouldn't argue against either!

 

I think both gen M3 sound great, though distinctive.

As for the E46 M3s, of which I have more than a little familiarity, yes they were inline sixes, perhaps one of the better cylinder arrangements for a number of reasons, and they were hardly "puny" as they would evicerate the a 3.7 Stangs and even run ahead of the 4.6 Stangs on the straights, then evicerate them as soon as one turned the steering wheel. That a decade+ old 3.2 M3 can still readily outpower brand new Stang 3.7, even after spotting the latter an extra half liter is hardly the mark of a puny car. They do have a very sharp sound, but that is as much reflective of their high CR, very aggressive cams, machined and polished ports and header exhaust, all of which send down each exhaust pulse like a knife-edged rifle shot than the softer pulses of a less highly tuned motor.

As for the current V8 M3, they has, what I would say, a dinstinct note over a Stang or Vette, more different than better or worse. Kind of has a distant, almost ghostly quality (I'm reaching here) than the deeper, earthier big Yank V8s. A lot of these Euro motors, though, I find sound much better in real life than on video. For some reason, video/audio clips just rarely captures the richness of their sounds like they can the deeper American V8s.

I would agree that the current V6 Stang could use a more soulful exhaust note though. Not that its bad, but not really sporty either - I'm sure Ford could do better.

 

For those of you saying it looks like a Fusion coupe. I don't really see the resemblance. This is what happens when you make a coupe from sedan. Almost identical.



vs

 

idk

 

If they designed a Fusion coupe, it would NOT look like that mustang.

 

Certainly not dissimilar, but I really think the fusion is a good looking little car. I like the Aston Martin look. I would love to see a FUSION SHO, 4wd and a really nice ecoboost 6'er for about 400 ponies. It would make a great option for someone who needs a functional back seat and still wants performance.

 

My fear is that Ford may have just "GTO'd" the Mustang the way GM messed up. Cause the GTO was fast, but it didn't look like what everyone thought a GTo should look... too much corporate styling. I hope I'm wrong. I think this looks "mustang" enough... just barely.

 

 

The last gen GTO was just a rebadged Holden Monaro, all they did is slap a new grill and logo and there you go, a sport car with just old brand name stock on top of it.

 

The GTO revival was the most souless sports coupe ever "produced" by the American car industry, let alone Pontiac. As much as I'm not on board with this new Mustang design yet, if it looks like the renders it will still have that miserable GTO beaten by miles. Then again even the Hyundai Scoupe did.