2015 Photoshop/Rendering Thread
Cobra R Member
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Yep, they are official renderings of the 2010 GT500. The image below was an official rendering of the 2005 GT, my point being that this car actually looks more like the 2010 GT. So, following that theory, there's a small chance that the next gen car may look similar to the 2010 rendering (hope you catch my drift 
)
)
Notice the Shawn 09 under the Original Artist's signature? It was a concept drawing for the 2010 that I modified to smooth it out and clean it up. The front fenders and Rear "Hips" were my main focus as originally the hips came into the door and didn't look right and messed with the proportions.
Cobra R Member
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 3
From: Florida
No Problem, LOL Honestly I had to look to see if it was mine or not, it seems like so long ago that I posted it. I'm just glad to see it's still floating around 3 years later. Here's a Quick Sketch I did for the 2014 when the 2010's came out.
Last edited by TampaBear67; Apr 20, 2011 at 12:31 PM. Reason: Added Pic
Why are they saving the rear diffuser for the SE ponies? They have to get rid of the lumpy black plastic that's on the '10+...
I'm noticing a bit of DBx influence there.
I'm noticing a bit of DBx influence there.
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Mach 1 Member
Joined: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 2
The classic scoop is joke. It never did anything even the original Shelbys didn't need a duct to the rear brakes. The rear facing scoop is node to mid engined cars Mustangs aren't mid or rear engined if you haven't noticed. On the other hand they have had huge problems getting the air out from under the hood and the ducts on the front fenders draw hot air out from under the engine compartment.
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
The classic scoop is joke. It never did anything even the original Shelbys didn't need a duct to the rear brakes. The rear facing scoop is node to mid engined cars Mustangs aren't mid or rear engined if you haven't noticed. On the other hand they have had huge problems getting the air out from under the hood and the ducts on the front fenders draw hot air out from under the engine compartment.
Cobra Member
Joined: October 23, 2009
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 2
From: NW Minnesota
Out of the many magazine articles I've read and the thousand of posts I've read on this forum, that's the first time I've ever read that the Mustang has "huge problems" or any problems with shedding hot air from under the hood. I agree that we don't need big jutting fake scoops ahead of the rear wheels, but having creases in the sheet metal that hint at it are part of the Mustang legacy. That running pony emblem doesn't provide any functionality either but most of us would darn well miss it if it were gone.
MOTM Committee Member
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
The classic scoop is joke. It never did anything even the original Shelbys didn't need a duct to the rear brakes. The rear facing scoop is node to mid engined cars Mustangs aren't mid or rear engined if you haven't noticed. On the other hand they have had huge problems getting the air out from under the hood and the ducts on the front fenders draw hot air out from under the engine compartment.
Bullitt Member
Joined: December 28, 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Yea I prefer the classic scoop regardless of functionality. It's classic mustang. I really don't like to see an 99-04 mustang without the side or hoodscoops. Looks to bland to me. But now if they went and put brake cooling ducts or just made them for some areo improvement then +1. Something the size of the SN95 or rad but smaller with 450HP handling like a Boss and the interior quality of a 2010+ and it'll be sweet.
If you're looking for a Cormarostang, sure... Otherwise... it's great graphics work, nothing more, nothing less. I see Corvette behind-the-wheel-well-scoops along with a Camaro window/roofline, and a possibility of a Mustang front end. Nothing solid. And nothing that speaks the Mustang design language exclusively or fluently. A cool design, yes. A Mustang design, no.
