Repair and Service Help All Repair related problems, issues, TSBs, and anything else revolving around the Repair of your Mustang

Another 2011 GT engine failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 10:51 AM
  #101  
stupidgenius36's Avatar
Just Plain Rude!
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 18
From: Denton, TX
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
I think attitudes may be changing with new 305 hp sixer keeping right with the previous year GT's
Nope. The same people will want it for the same reasons. The people that want a Mustang for HP are still gonna go for the GT instead.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 10:56 AM
  #102  
2 Go Snake's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2011
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 6
From: Minnesota
Smile

I think the name of this thread should be ; I found the greatest dealer, he replaced my engine at no cost to me.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 11:30 AM
  #103  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
I must be lucky because I have had my 2011 stang for about 14 months and luckily not one single issue. I think you V8 guys may be riding her a bit to hard. Don't you know slow and steady wins the race. Lmao.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 01:17 PM
  #104  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
Is it me or are majority of people having issues with the 5.0. It seems that owners of the 2011 plus V6 models are not having as many issues with the car as the 5.0. What's the deal?
Wha?? No V6 Mustang's on the list?

Guess that 5.0 V8 is more dependable than the few whiners allege.

Ward's releases annual 10 Best Engines list
https://themustangsource.com/f647/wa...3/#post6196031

Last edited by cdynaco; Dec 8, 2011 at 01:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 01:24 PM
  #105  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Wha?? No V6 Mustang's on the list?

Guess that 5.0 V8 is more dependable than the few whiners allege.

Ward's releases annual 10 Best Engines list
https://themustangsource.com/f647/wa...3/#post6196031
This.

No disrespect to the V6 though. great motor, great car.

Most of the 5.0 complaints is internet hype and faulty aftermarket tunes
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #106  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by cdynaco

Wha?? No V6 Mustang's on the list?

Guess that 5.0 V8 is more dependable than the few whiners allege.

Ward's releases annual 10 Best Engines list
https://themustangsource.com/f647/wa...3/#post6196031
Im not saying the v6 is not having issues it just seemed that the 5.0 was having more posts about there issues.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 02:43 PM
  #107  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
This.

No disrespect to the V6 though. great motor, great car.

Most of the 5.0 complaints is internet hype and faulty aftermarket tunes
Really, tunes. What are they causing? Like the sct bama tuner. I thought they work great. What issues are they causing with the engines in the v6? Just curious.

Last edited by 2011 Kona Blue; Dec 8, 2011 at 02:44 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 02:51 PM
  #108  
Rather B.Blown's Avatar
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
 
Joined: April 4, 2007
Posts: 20,164
Likes: 643
From: Just outside the middle of nowhere
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
Really, tunes. What are they causing? Like the sct bama tuner. I thought they work great. What issues are they causing with the engines in the v6? Just curious.

#8 cylinder failure. Piston breaking at the ring land.

Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 03:53 PM
  #109  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
Really, tunes. What are they causing? Like the sct bama tuner. I thought they work great. What issues are they causing with the engines in the v6? Just curious.
what hillbilly said.

In short tuners were being a little bit too agressive cause some #8 cylinders to run too hot. It was an aftermarket growing pain.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 04:44 PM
  #110  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
what hillbilly said.

In short tuners were being a little bit too agressive cause some #8 cylinders to run too hot. It was an aftermarket growing pain.
Its my understanding that issue about # 8 cylinders has been corrected by American Musscle and that issue is no more.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 06:02 PM
  #111  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
Its my understanding that issue about # 8 cylinders has been corrected by American Musscle and that issue is no more.
Yes, they've since been corrected.

Just brought it up because that led to the slight perception thath the 5.0 was a weak motor
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 07:12 PM
  #112  
ford4v429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2005
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 77
From: N.E. Ohio
definitely not a weak motor...teething pains for tuners (although only a few instances, I DO think Ford has probably realized already that #8 cooling wise might need a slight revision), and a couple instances of unacceptable oil consumption.

for a lightweight aluminum motor, its a very impressive piece.

I am kinda worried -er, curious- on the gt500 5~10~20 yrs down the road how the sprayed iron liners will hold up, at only like .006" thick finished, just wonder what happens when a couple thou wears away combined with temperature cycling... I'm sure Fords looked into it for durability- but just gotta wonder if 5~10 yrs is far enough out of warranty, do they really worry about it? its a neat concept, but still seems to me to be a kinda scary way to lose 8 pounds...seems to me as a lot of shelbys seem to get stored away how sitting will affect them too, as part of the spray liner is basically rust

Last edited by ford4v429; Dec 8, 2011 at 07:17 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2011 | 10:40 AM
  #113  
red pony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 23, 2008
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: new castle, pa
Originally Posted by ford4v429
definitely not a weak motor...teething pains for tuners (although only a few instances, I DO think Ford has probably realized already that #8 cooling wise might need a slight revision), and a couple instances of unacceptable oil consumption.

for a lightweight aluminum motor, its a very impressive piece.

I am kinda worried -er, curious- on the gt500 5~10~20 yrs down the road how the sprayed iron liners will hold up, at only like .006" thick finished, just wonder what happens when a couple thou wears away combined with temperature cycling... I'm sure Fords looked into it for durability- but just gotta wonder if 5~10 yrs is far enough out of warranty, do they really worry about it? its a neat concept, but still seems to me to be a kinda scary way to lose 8 pounds...seems to me as a lot of shelbys seem to get stored away how sitting will affect them too, as part of the spray liner is basically rust
If I understood correctly, Ford uses a low tension ring package. That alone must help save the cylinder walls! But , if that's true, maybe that might explain the oil consumption issue!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 02:23 AM
  #114  
8WOOD's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 18, 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
This.

Most of the 5.0 complaints is internet hype and faulty aftermarket tunes

I think what it really is that the car has the ability to burn off 3-4 quarts in a thousand miles tune or not. Most people don't check their oil in a "new car" that often. They buy it figuring it's like the other cars they've owned in the past and that they won't have a problem because it's new. I checked my oil before a 1000 mile trip and it was in the operating range, and though I was driving fairly hard, it burned off 5 quarts and blew up before the very first oil change. I know some people might say well you shouldn't drive that hard, thinking that I have no clue how a engine should be maintained. I put 43,000 miles on a z06 and drove that car into the ground, I only checked the oil before I tracked it, I never checked when I was using it as DD, and it never burned off any oil. I put 20,000 miles on a 400 whp evoX and never added oil to the car. Their Ford shop manager that (dealer that replaced my engine) told me that they've had a couple 5.0's in the shop because they burned of oil till the engine seized I'm thinking there's a lot more of these engine going down than what's the "internet hype." When it comes down to it, Ford has horrible quality control on this new 5.0 gt.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 12:22 PM
  #115  
stupidgenius36's Avatar
Just Plain Rude!
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 18
From: Denton, TX
Originally Posted by 8WOOD
I'm thinking there's a lot more of these engine going down than what's the "internet hype."
I believe the "internet hype" he was referring to was the transmission issues, which *were* just hype.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 10:53 PM
  #116  
2 Go Snake's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2011
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 6
From: Minnesota
Unhappy

To not check the engine oil level frequently is just plain ridiculous. You never know when something could put a hole in the oil pan or filter or something could come loose and cause an oil leak. Checking the oil level in any engine is good preventive maintenance.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #117  
mystickeith50's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 2, 2010
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
To not check the engine oil level frequently is just plain ridiculous. You never know when something could put a hole in the oil pan or filter or something could come loose and cause an oil leak. Checking the oil level in any engine is good preventive maintenance.
Yup...especially a high compression high hp car.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 05:55 PM
  #118  
Rather B.Blown's Avatar
Like Father...
I ♥ Sausage
 
Joined: April 4, 2007
Posts: 20,164
Likes: 643
From: Just outside the middle of nowhere
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
To not check the engine oil level frequently is just plain ridiculous. You never know when something could put a hole in the oil pan or filter or something could come loose and cause an oil leak. Checking the oil level in any engine is good preventive maintenance.
True, but you'd also think a $40K car would have a freaking light or message that would come on when the oil level got down to say, um I don't know, 4 ****ING QUARTS LOW on a brand new car! Hell, my 12 year old Explorer will tell you when the oil is low.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #119  
MyStang2010GB's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 4
From: Lithia, FL
Originally Posted by Rather B.Blown
True, but you'd also think a $40K car would have a freaking light or message that would come on when the oil level got down to say, um I don't know, 4 ****ING QUARTS LOW on a brand new car! Hell, my 12 year old Explorer will tell you when the oil is low.
^^^ THIS ^^^
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 10:26 AM
  #120  
8WOOD's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 18, 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
my 67 camaro with a 400 small block burned less oil that this car.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 PM.