Rocket City Mustang Club Huntsville, Alabama Chapter of The Mustang Club of America

Trivia Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #241  
garagewear's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 24, 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, AL
It is funny that the add says "Ford's three popular small cars". The Mustang is huge compared to the Pinto.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #242  
mustang6804's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2008
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
24 hour rule.

What were the three main exterior differences between the 1967 and 1968 mustangs.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #243  
kennyg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 23, 2007
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 3
From: Flintville, Tennessee
Originally Posted by mustang6804
24 hour rule.

What were the three main exterior differences between the 1967 and 1968 mustangs.
1967 had a grille ornament similar to 1965, the 1968 was more like the 1966 with the floating horse and corral. The quarter panel ornaments on a 1967 had vented/louvered looking ornaments and the 1968 had a single strip of chrome mounted on a body colored bezel. The gas cap had the same styling changes as the grille. kennyg
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #244  
mustang6804's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2008
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
Good job. the gas cap wasnt part of that, even though it did change. The last change WAS government regulated.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #245  
BA Mustang's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: June 29, 2007
Posts: 4,133
Likes: 2
From: Huntsville, AL
That would be the lights on the side on the fenders and rear quarter panels.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 06:38 AM
  #246  
kennyg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 23, 2007
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 3
From: Flintville, Tennessee
The government mandate was for reflectors on the sides. Ford opted to make it a light on the front fenders and reflectors on the rear quarters. There were two different reflectors used on the '68's quarters, a surface mount (same as used on Cougar) and a recessed one. kennyg
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:19 AM
  #247  
mustang6804's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2008
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
thats right
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #248  
kennyg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 23, 2007
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 3
From: Flintville, Tennessee
Front disc brakes were available as optional equipment on Mustangs with V-8's almost from the beginning of production. What year did front disc brakes become a standard production item for all Mustangs regardless of engine option? kennyg
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:08 AM
  #249  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Just guessing, But I'd say 1974.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:29 AM
  #250  
kennyg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 23, 2007
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 3
From: Flintville, Tennessee
Originally Posted by mgreene
Just guessing, But I'd say 1974.
Good guess. You are correct. kennyg
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:44 AM
  #251  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
The Ford GT40 won LeMans in 1966, 1967, 1968, and 1969 to put an end to Ferrari dominance. LeMans was considered the pinnacle of innovation and automotive engineering advancement. What was significant about the winning vehicle in 1968 and 1969?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 07:00 AM
  #252  
mustang6804's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2008
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville
they lost the 7.0 L and had to go with a smaller 5.0 L?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #253  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mustang6804
they lost the 7.0 L and had to go with a smaller 5.0 L?
That is true, but something even more significant about the winner those two years...
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 11:20 AM
  #254  
garagewear's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 24, 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, AL
Carbon Fiber body on a Mirage chassis
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #255  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
One of the competing cars was bodied as a Mirage in '69, but not carbon fiber way back then...

Still looking for the significance of the winning vehicle for 1968 and 1969.

Last edited by mgreene; Dec 3, 2009 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #256  
Lawn Ornament's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: March 13, 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I always did hate when it was Mike's turn for trivia at the meetings.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #257  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
I stand corrected, portions were Carbon fiber. But still not the most significant attribute...
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #258  
garagewear's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 24, 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Harvest, AL
While I was at lunch I kept thinking I had it wrong and it was a Lola chassis. The only reason I said carbon fiber was I knew Wier (Wyer sp?) was one of the carbon fiber pioneers in racing. It was too late to be Ken Miles driving. I think he crashed in '66. Were these the years of the Gulf cars winning?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #259  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Yes, Gulf was the sponsor of the winner in 1968 and 1969. Still need the significance - maybe you're getting closer.

Last edited by mgreene; Dec 3, 2009 at 01:08 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 07:51 AM
  #260  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
OK, I'm gonna call the 24 hour rule on myself and let kennyg do the next one as he had the last correct answer.

The significance of the 1968 and 1969 LeMans winner? It was the exact same car that won both years - GT-40 chassis #P1075. First time this had ever happened!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.