2007-2009 Mustang GT/CS California Special

2007 GT/CS Photos!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2/6/06, 05:18 PM
  #101  
GT Member
 
SonicStanGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pitpup @ February 6, 2006, 6:18 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Gee, I love that kinda talk!
[/b][/quote]

There is a dealer in Costa Mesa with two 6 cyl cars with the California Special stuff on them and upgraded wheels/tires. The badge on the trunk says "SCS". I have no clue with the extra S is for.....maybe six as in 6-cyl? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]

?????
Old 2/6/06, 05:28 PM
  #102  
Team Mustang Source
 
mustang68w's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry every now and again the angry jarhead comes out [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/box2.gif[/img]










[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/iwojima.gif[/img]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SonicStanGirl @ February 6, 2006, 4:21 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
There is a dealer in Costa Mesa with two 6 cyl cars with the California Special stuff on them and upgraded wheels/tires. The badge on the trunk says "SCS". I have no clue with the extra S is for.....maybe six as in 6-cyl? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]

?????
[/b][/quote]



That might be some kind of off-shoot of the 2005 SDS " San Diego Special " V6 mustangs they have running around here
Old 2/6/06, 06:05 PM
  #103  
Bullitt Member
 
Roadster2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
O i couldnt resist the GT/CS in the new new Valencia Orange

[attachmentid=44642]

P.s. It came out more like a peach color
Old 2/6/06, 07:11 PM
  #104  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
arin likes it [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

but some hp bumps woulda been nice
Old 2/6/06, 07:29 PM
  #105  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
karman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,907
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boomer @ February 6, 2006, 11:08 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
See...
Here's the beauty...
You can buy a GT if you want the clean look....
...or you can buy a GT/CS if you want the tacked on look.

Satisfies both crowds...
..they aren't forcing the scoops on ANYONE

I don't get why so many people are against it.
You may not like it, but no ones forcing you to buy it, you can still achieve the clean look in a GT
[/b][/quote]
\
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/bling.gif[/img] Not my thing, but Ford sales need all the help they can get. Think Positive [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Old 2/6/06, 09:32 PM
  #106  
Member
 
Mikedc3's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 21, 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't post here much and am not in the market for a Mustang but I have to ask. If that is a running car with only tape and scoops and it's 2-06. Why can't they get that to market this year 2006??
Old 2/6/06, 09:52 PM
  #107  
 
06GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Those pictures are positively underwhelming [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img]
Old 2/6/06, 10:15 PM
  #108  
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
AFBLUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts


So be it.
Old 2/6/06, 10:38 PM
  #109  
 
Enfynet's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img] I don't see the problem with the CS... I've always thought of it as the "pony package" for the GT...
Old 2/6/06, 11:03 PM
  #110  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,930
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
not digging the facia....
Old 2/7/06, 08:14 AM
  #111  
FR500 Member
 
acadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Enfynet @ February 6, 2006, 11:41 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img] I don't see the problem with the CS... I've always thought of it as the "pony package" for the GT...
[/b][/quote]


Exactly what I was thinking. Leave the performance upgrades for a possible Mach or Bullitt.

And on a semi-side note... I have never owned a SN95 Mustang, but haven't the side scoops always been fake since '94? Have any of those stangs actually had functioning side scoops, other than possibly the Cobras?
Old 2/7/06, 08:56 AM
  #112  
Member
 
cadmonkey12's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the side scoops on early run 94's were functional as well as the side scoops on Saleens in that body style...Can anyone verify this?
Old 2/8/06, 06:52 AM
  #113  
Bullitt Member
 
35thGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 31, 2004
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(cadmonkey12 @ February 7, 2006, 10:59 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I thought the side scoops on early run 94's were functional as well as the side scoops on Saleens in that body style...Can anyone verify this?
[/b][/quote]


Yes, my 94 GT had functioning side scoops. Although they did not flow air very well, from my water test with a garden hose the results were less than free flowing.
Old 2/8/06, 06:57 AM
  #114  
Administrator, Shop Manual PDF Poster, Parts Locator & Spam Bot Eliminator!!
 
05stangkc's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 27, 2004
Location: Visalia Ca.
Posts: 10,114
Received 2,536 Likes on 1,871 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rondosa @ February 6, 2006, 6:47 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
ooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooo attention Kevin - more info please!!!

[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

I keep Checking for Updated info. The New 07 Order Guide May hit before I get any more Parts Catalog Updates. But I will keep Checking.

kc
Old 2/8/06, 11:09 AM
  #115  
FR500 Member
 
acadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(35thGT @ February 8, 2006, 7:55 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Yes, my 94 GT had functioning side scoops. Although they did not flow air very well, from my water test with a garden hose the results were less than free flowing.
[/b][/quote]

Good to know. What about '99-'04 GT's? Anyone who owns, or has owned, that body style have the answer?
Old 2/8/06, 11:42 AM
  #116  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Tony Alonso's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,399
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(acadian @ February 8, 2006, 1:12 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Good to know. What about '99-'04 GT's? Anyone who owns, or has owned, that body style have the answer?
[/b][/quote]

They were non-functional appearance items on my 2000 GT. The ones that came in 2001, which stuck out more, were the same. My current car has the same fake ones (01-04).
Old 2/8/06, 11:59 AM
  #117  
Bullitt Member
 
John SCB's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2005
Posts: 318
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Sorry, but if Ford is going to make something really "special", they need to add more than just cosmetics. Now, THIS would be more like it!1 [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img]
Old 2/8/06, 12:42 PM
  #118  
Member
 
cadmonkey12's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(35thGT @ February 8, 2006, 7:55 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Yes, my 94 GT had functioning side scoops. Although they did not flow air very well, from my water test with a garden hose the results were less than free flowing.
[/b][/quote]

Do you have any photos of the scoops or the fenderwell behind the scoops?
Old 2/8/06, 04:25 PM
  #119  
Team Mustang Source
 
mustang68w's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2005
Location: Sin City
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(John SCB @ February 8, 2006, 11:02 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Sorry, but if Ford is going to make something really "special", they need to add more than just cosmetics. Now, THIS would be more like it!1 [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/drool.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


See post #99





I dont think people are grasping the concept of what these cars oringinaly were. Ford is keeping in the original concept of the car i.e. all of the standard mustang gt options, with a body kit. Thats it no more no less. I will say it once again, slowly this time, if you want a performance SE wait for the BOOOOOSSSSSSSSS or MAAAAAAAAAAAACH 1............

geeze [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Old 2/8/06, 04:32 PM
  #120  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(mustang68w @ February 8, 2006, 5:28 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
See post #99
I dont think people are grasping the concept of what these cars oringinaly were. Ford is keeping in the original concept of the car i.e. all of the standard mustang gt options, with a body kit. Thats it no more no less. I will say it once again, slowly this time, if you want a performance SE wait for the BOOOOOSSSSSSSSS or MAAAAAAAAAAAACH 1............

geeze [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

I don't get the angst either. It's an option package not an SE. It's no different than ordering the IUP package over the standard dash.


Quick Reply: 2007 GT/CS Photos!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.