2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

will 2011 have the 5.0 for sure?? how sure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #121  
TampaBear67's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by holderca1
You misread what he said. You said the mufflers in the rear was a Japanese thing and he responded that a '66 Thunderbird has them there. Obviously the Thunderbird isn't Japanese, which is the point he was making. He never said the Thunderbird was a muscle car/pony car.
Thanks, That was My Point, Mufflers placed where they are has nothing to do with the Country of Origin or What Decade they were Built In.

He'll Always Come Up With Some BS to try to Defend His Rhetoric.

I Don't Know Why I Bother Feeding The Troll?

I Just Cannot Stand Closed Minded People, that Always Use Some Kind of Prejudice To Validate Their Point Of View, i.e. Mufflers Out Back Like a Japanese Car.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #122  
Eights's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 17, 2007
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Moosetang
As far as I know from what BlueII and 4Cam were saying, it was just a test program and they haven't been inclined to spend money developing it further in the current financial climate. I imagine the technology from 777 will find its way into other Ford and Roush efforts, but if 777 itself hits the street (be it as a Crate or a Roush package) it likely won't be until after the worst of this storm has passed.
Moosetang: Thanks for the update, Moosetang! Once Ford decided that the 6.2L was to be offered only in the F-150 at first--and then perhaps in the F-150-based SUVs later--it made the 777 a large, slow target at close range in the periscope of the budget-cutters. If it is truly a SOHC two-valver, it had issues anyway--why develop it if you plan to shortly replace the heads with multivalve units anyhoooo? Mustangs do not need to return to two-valve heads...

Greg "Eights" Ates
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:05 AM
  #123  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by holderca1
You misread what he said. You said the mufflers in the rear was a Japanese thing and he responded that a '66 Thunderbird has them there. Obviously the Thunderbird isn't Japanese, which is the point he was making. He never said the Thunderbird was a muscle car/pony car.
Didn't misread anything. Just stated that I don't care about Thunderbirds. In other words, I couldn't care less where they put the mufflers on T-birds. However, on a Mustang they should be mid-mounted, not in the back. That's my biggest disappointment with all S197 Mustangs...

BTW, the majority of Japanese cars do in fact have the muffler(s) at the rear of the car.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #124  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Even Steven

BTW, the majority of Japanese cars do in fact have the muffler(s) at the rear of the car.
The majority of all cars have the mufflers at the rear. Japanese, European, North American, Australian.

Hell, the Camaro has been using rear mufflers since the '80s.

Last edited by SuperSugeKnight; Dec 9, 2008 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #125  
TampaBear67's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Yeah SugeKnight, they are placed for Efficient Packaging, and Aerodynamics now. We all know how Efficient those Germans and Japanese are when it comes to packaging.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #126  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
My packaging is just fine, front and center thankyouverymuch.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #127  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
The majority of all cars have the mufflers at the rear. Japanese, European, North American, Australian.

Hell, the Camaro has been using rear mufflers since the '80s.
Not Mustangs. And that's my whole point. All of the older musclecars used mid-mounted mufflers. And that's a big part of how they got that awesome musclecar sound. It's nearly impossible to reproduce that sound with a rear mounted muffler. Up until the S197 with its rear mounted mufflers, it was easy to make a V8 Mustang sound just like an old 5.0L Fox body car. I'm sure you and everyone else is very familiar with a 5.0L car with Flows and and offroad H-pipe. It's almost a classic sound in itself and almost entirely impossible to reproduce on an S197 because of the muffler location.

Not to mention that it looks wack too! Luckily, Boomtubes and Loudmouths were invented for those of us who prefer not to see mufflers when looking at the back of our Mustangs!!!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #128  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by Even Steven
Not to mention that it looks wack too! Luckily, Boomtubes and Loudmouths were invented for those of us who prefer not to see mufflers when looking at the back of our Mustangs!!!
What they need is a big giant chunk of black plastic out back to hide those pesky mufflers! Oughta look great!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #129  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by zzcoop
What they need is a big giant chunk of black plastic out back to hide those pesky mufflers! Oughta look great!

You know, the diaper doesn't even hide mufflers. Just look at that picture of the Ford Racing Mustang in the snow that was posted the other day. You can see the mufflers just as easily as you can on the '05 body style.

Gotta thank Mac for the Boomtubes! Or if those are too loud, at least Flowmaster has black mufflers that blend in and don't look too bad.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #130  
black sunshine's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 23, 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 6
From: Wallingford CT
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
Hey, I wouldn't be laughing (referring to the lol comment). You don't want either GM or Chrysler to go under. If one did, you and every other America will feel the ramificantions HARD! And if you haven't read any of the reports, Ford is in the best stance of the 3 auto makers. Relax, they are fine for a while.
The big three won't go under anytime soon. Our government will pump them up with our tax dollars to keep them afloat. All I know is after the automakers get their bailout from our tax dollars I'll never pay any more than 1/2 invoice on a new American car. The way I see it is I have partial ovenership on all American made cars. Let the ignorant Attack!!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #131  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by black sunshine
....I'll never pay any more than 1/2 invoice on a new American car.
Good luck with that one! Let me know how you make out!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 01:48 AM
  #132  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by black sunshine
All I know is after the automakers get their bailout from our tax dollars I'll never pay any more than 1/2 invoice on a new American car. The way I see it is I have partial ovenership on all American made cars. Let the ignorant Attack!!!!!
AH-HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #133  
tacbear's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 22, 2005
Posts: 800
Likes: 7
2010 Boss 302 5.0L 400 hp (to help sell the last of the 2010's)

2011 GT 5.0L 400 hp
SVO 3.5TT 340hp (way under rated, more like 400 on 93/E85)
Base 3.5 285hp
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #134  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
AH-HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
How about those Canadian car companies, how are they doing in these times.

Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #135  
BLK Sunshine's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 10, 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by tacbear
2010 Boss 302 5.0L 400 hp (to help sell the last of the 2010's)

2011 GT 5.0L 400 hp
SVO 3.5TT 340hp (way under rated, more like 400 on 93/E85)
Base 3.5 285hp
If this is true, would there be any incentive to paying a markup for the boss, instead of just waiting for the 2011?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #136  
TampaBear67's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Originally Posted by BLK Sunshine
If this is true, would there be any incentive to paying a markup for the boss, instead of just waiting for the 2011?
The only incentive would be the fact that it would be a Special Edition, limited production model. Other than the fact you could say you had one of the First 5.0's and the first new Boss 302 in 30 Years. Huh...just thought about that, the 2010 is Exactly 30 years since Ford built the last Boss 302. What better time to bring it back?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #137  
MBK's Avatar
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
SVO would be a killer. with a tune people will be at 400+ whp. that's going to draw a lot of attention from the younger people that like to fiddle w/ boost.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #138  
93cobrastang's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 2, 2004
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Lenore WV
Just put it this way, theres somethin bigger coming then a 4.6 in a option package.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #139  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by TampaBear67
Yeah SugeKnight, they are placed for Efficient Packaging, and Aerodynamics now. We all know how Efficient those Germans and Japanese are when it comes to packaging.
I'd hazard a guess the muffler packaging on new cars has less to do with being efficent and aerodynamic and more to do with gas tank regs, sadly for the Mustang it killed what was pretty much a signature sound, on the plus side - no Pinto problems.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 07:08 PM
  #140  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Packaging and ease of changing out

As for the 5L I have no doubt it'll eventually be the ONLY engine.
I don't see the 4.6 around for very much longer.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 PM.