Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

What's the BFD with IRS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/30/08, 05:33 PM
  #501  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FordBlueHeart
Yes, I wanted you to pull out the data. Do you really think that a mustang shopper also looks at the Nissan and Accord? Highly doubtful. The camaro, yes. The camaro isnt even in the game yet! When it does come around the mustang will shoot right back in front with its newer powertrains. Maybe the 2010 is a lame duck year with holdover powertrains. Maybe not. Nothing is set in stone about the V6 application..yet.
I agree with jarradsay, how are these cars not competition to the Mustang? They are all sporty coupes with similar power. These cars are all about style and performance over function. While the typical 4 cyl 4 door mid-size sedan is the more popular choice during these days, most average coupe consumers (typically young, single, no children) would consider all these cars.

Though I'm partial to the Mustang I have also owned other coupes, a Toyota Celica and a Mitsubishi 3000GT. Both, were like the Mustang in that they offered style and performance. Now the imports are making outstanding power from V6s some reaching V8 levels. If I was forced to go with a V6 I'd choose the Accord over the Mustang.

The Mustang is a quick affordable car, anyone looking to go fast for cheap money will consider all alternatives. Go to a local drag strip, I bet you will see as many imports and compacts compared to Mustangs and Camaros...... SRT4s vs Cobalt SS and is almost the Mustang vs. Camaro of the next generation.
Old 10/30/08, 05:41 PM
  #502  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FordBlueHeart
Say what you will about preferring the SRA but where are you basing your 98% claim? This is simply not true! I will bet my life saving that the Camaro SS will be the better handling car compared to the upcoming Mustang! The idea of added cost is a myth. Back in 99' Ford added an IRS to the Mustang Cobra and added minimal cost to the MSRP and the car benefited a great deal.

IRS power levels? The fastest cars in the world all have them (Ferrari, Porsche, Lamborghini...)! Look at the newest and greatest American supercar the 09' Corvette ZR1. We care talking well north of 600HP from the factory with an "overrated" IRS setup!
None of the cars you have listed are within a normal person's budget. It takes a lot of money to make them do what they do. We will see what the Camaro can do once it is here for all of us to drive. Until then it is only successful in benchracing.[/quote]

What about the 05-06 GTO, newest Nissan 350Z, RX8. Yes only the GTO is a V8 but the other two are fairly powerful RWD coupes with IRS than handle quite well within the price range of a Mustang GT, heck the Subaru WRX is an engineering marvel and priced about the same as a Mustang GT.

I guess my main argument is that blaming cost as the culprit for not getting an IRS is bogus. Ford's 99-04 IRS equipped Cobras where within the same price range as the SS Camaro of the day.
Old 10/30/08, 05:43 PM
  #503  
Mach 1 Member
 
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Location: Traverse City
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97GT03SVT
I agree with jarradsay, how are these cars not competition to the Mustang? They are all sporty coupes with similar power. These cars are all about style and performance over function. While the typical 4 cyl 4 door mid-size sedan is the more popular choice during these days, most average coupe consumers (typically young, single, no children) would consider all these cars.

Though I'm partial to the Mustang I have also owned other coupes, a Toyota Celica and a Mitsubishi 3000GT. Both, were like the Mustang in that they offered style and performance. Now the imports are making outstanding power from V6s some reaching V8 levels. If I was forced to go with a V6 I'd choose the Accord over the Mustang.

The Mustang is a quick affordable car, anyone looking to go fast for cheap money will consider all alternatives. Go to a local drag strip, I bet you will see as many imports and compacts compared to Mustangs and Camaros...... SRT4s vs Cobalt SS and is almost the Mustang vs. Camaro of the next generation.
No one would force me to get a V6. No way I would choose an Accord over a mustang(V8). I would choose a turbo boosted 4 cylinder before I chose a NA V6. Still find it hard to believe I would get a front wheel drive anything before a rear wheel drive V8. I have driven SRT4s, Accord coupes, Eclipse Fwds, Cobalt SSs, Mazdaspeed3s. None of them give me the excitement that a rear wheel drive car does. They were just as fast, if not faster, but they didnt stir my soul.
Old 10/30/08, 05:46 PM
  #504  
Mach 1 Member
 
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Location: Traverse City
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 97GT03SVT
None of the cars you have listed are within a normal person's budget. It takes a lot of money to make them do what they do. We will see what the Camaro can do once it is here for all of us to drive. Until then it is only successful in benchracing.
What about the 05-06 GTO, newest Nissan 350Z, RX8. Yes only the GTO is a V8 but the other two are fairly powerful RWD coupes with IRS than handle quite well within the price range of a Mustang GT, heck the Subaru WRX is an engineering marvel and priced about the same as a Mustang GT.

I guess my main argument is that blaming cost as the culprit for not getting an IRS is bogus. Ford's 99-04 IRS equipped Cobras where within the same price range as the SS Camaro of the day.[/QUOTE]

I always thought I would like the RX8, until I saw the price and then drove it. Way underpowered. WRX wasnt as fast or quick as the mustang. Would be fun driving our ice covered roads, or dirt roads. But I definitely dont like the current styling. Liked the previous generation.
Old 10/30/08, 06:06 PM
  #505  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always thought I would like the RX8, until I saw the price and then drove it. Way underpowered. WRX wasnt as fast or quick as the mustang. Would be fun driving our ice covered roads, or dirt roads. But I definitely dont like the current styling. Liked the previous generation.[/quote]


Hey Subaru has quickly learned the era of their ways after an unpopular 08' into. The 09' WRX now has a lot more power 265HP! Magazines list them reaching 0-60 in 4.8 sec and 1/4 in 13.5 for less money than a Mustang GT! It is a blast to drive, AWD turbos are cool I think Ford should offer us something like this once we get the euro spec Focus in the US.

As far as styling goes it has grown on me, less boy-racer than the previous gen. I'm not saying a WRX would ever replace my Mustang but, it would be a worthy stablemate
Old 10/30/08, 07:35 PM
  #506  
Cobra Member
 
GT5088's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 29, 2007
Location: smallest state in the union.
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my buddy bought a '05 WRX STI brand new and had it for a little over a yr....that car was a real thrill...and I am not a fan of imports really...but he sold it for a brand new Silverado...
Old 10/30/08, 09:08 PM
  #507  
Mach 1 Member
 
Black GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2008
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Question Most of the cars you are listing are NOT PONY CARS.

Yeah, they are in the same class with the Mustang like the early 70's Opel GT was in the same class as the Corvette. That must be why the Opel GT was commonly referred to as the poor man's Corvette...
The pony car is a class of automobile launched and inspired by the Ford Mustang in 1964. It describes an affordable, compact, highly styled car with a sporty or performance-oriented image.

Iacocca's marketing studies revealed that if a unique-looking sporty car could be offered at an affordable price, it would find many buyers. Ford's response to this demand was the Mustang, launched on April 17, 1964, which proved to be an enormous success. The company was forecasting sales for the first year to reach 100,000 units. However, Ford dealers took 22,000 orders the first day and the company had to shift production mid-year. The extended model year sales totaled 618,812 Mustangs.

Defining the class

The Mustang provided the template for the new class of automobiles. Although it was based on the platform of the Falcon, it had a unique body (offered as a hardtop coupé and a convertible) with distinctive, "long hood, short deck" proportions. In basic form it was mechanically mundane, with a 170 cu in (2.8 L) six-cylinder engine coupled to a three-speed manual transmission. It carried an attractive base price of US$2,368 that included bucket seats, carpeting, floor shifter, sport steering wheel, and full wheel covers. The Mustang also had an extensive option list offering a range of V8 engines, Cruise-O-Matic automatic transmission or four-speed manual gearbox, radios, air conditioning, power steering, and other accessories. A V8 Mustang with all available options would cost about 60% more than a basic model with a six-cylinder engine, which made it an extremely profitable model for Ford.

The requirements were therefore set:
  • Attractive, sporty styling
  • Affordable base price
  • Extensive options, including six-cylinder and V8 engines
  • Aggressive, youth-oriented marketing and advertising.
While most of the pony cars offered more powerful engines and performance packages, enough to qualify some into muscle car territory, a substantial number were sold with six-cylinder engines or ordinary V8s. For the most part, the high-performance models saw limited sales.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pony_car

The new Camaro and Challenger are modern Pony Cars, most of the cars you are listing are NOT PONY CARS.

The Mustang has always been the "original" Pony Car and it still is the preeminent a Pony Car.


Originally Posted by 97GT03SVT
I agree with jarradsay, how are these cars not competition to the Mustang? They are all sporty coupes with similar power. These cars are all about style and performance over function.

Last edited by Black GT500; 10/30/08 at 09:13 PM.
Old 10/30/08, 09:30 PM
  #508  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Black GT500
...most of the cars you are listing are NOT PONY CARS.
True. But what of it?
Old 10/31/08, 12:09 AM
  #509  
Cobra Member
 
eric n's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 27, 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FordBlueHeart
Yes, I wanted you to pull out the data. Do you really think that a mustang shopper also looks at the Nissan and Accord? Highly doubtful. The camaro, yes. The camaro isnt even in the game yet! When it does come around the mustang will shoot right back in front with its newer powertrains. Maybe the 2010 is a lame duck year with holdover powertrains. Maybe not. Nothing is set in stone about the V6 application..yet.
I absolutely cross shopped the nissan and infiniti. I recently took out a g37 coupe for a ride. Great car. Really needs a better exhaust note, but comfortable, reasonably quick, hands great, smokin interior. Not enough torque to satisfy, but definitely cross shopped.
Old 10/31/08, 07:12 AM
  #510  
Mach 1 Member
 
jarradasay's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Black GT500
The new Camaro and Challenger are modern Pony Cars, most of the cars you are listing are NOT PONY CARS.

The Mustang has always been the "original" Pony Car and it still is the preeminent a Pony Car.
Hey 1969 called, it wants it's thought process and classifications back!

We listed the mustangs competition. Call it whatever you want.
Old 10/31/08, 09:12 AM
  #511  
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
MBK's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the main competitors are the challenger and camaro. you can also call the 350z a competitor for the GT and the new toyota/subaru AE86 a competitor for the V6
Old 10/31/08, 10:50 AM
  #512  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MBK
the main competitors are the challenger and camaro. you can also call the 350z a competitor for the GT and the new toyota/subaru AE86 a competitor for the V6
You might also want to throw in the new Hyundai Coupe as it is, in 3.8 form, a RWD 2+2 sport coupe with more HP than a Stang GT and arguably better brakes and suspension (Brembos and IRS). I don't doubt that there will be some cross shopping outside of each makes own fanboys. Now if Hyundai would drop that nice 4.6 in the thing, that would really shake up the Pony Car market with its first serious foreign V8 contender, but I don't think Hyundai has enough spine for that sort of bold move.
Old 10/31/08, 12:02 PM
  #513  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black GT500
Yeah, they are in the same class with the Mustang like the early 70's Opel GT was in the same class as the Corvette. That must be why the Opel GT was commonly referred to as the poor man's Corvette...
The pony car is a class of automobile launched and inspired by the Ford Mustang in 1964. It describes an affordable, compact, highly styled car with a sporty or performance-oriented image.

Iacocca's marketing studies revealed that if a unique-looking sporty car could be offered at an affordable price, it would find many buyers. Ford's response to this demand was the Mustang, launched on April 17, 1964, which proved to be an enormous success. The company was forecasting sales for the first year to reach 100,000 units. However, Ford dealers took 22,000 orders the first day and the company had to shift production mid-year. The extended model year sales totaled 618,812 Mustangs.

Defining the class

The Mustang provided the template for the new class of automobiles. Although it was based on the platform of the Falcon, it had a unique body (offered as a hardtop coupé and a convertible) with distinctive, "long hood, short deck" proportions. In basic form it was mechanically mundane, with a 170 cu in (2.8 L) six-cylinder engine coupled to a three-speed manual transmission. It carried an attractive base price of US$2,368 that included bucket seats, carpeting, floor shifter, sport steering wheel, and full wheel covers. The Mustang also had an extensive option list offering a range of V8 engines, Cruise-O-Matic automatic transmission or four-speed manual gearbox, radios, air conditioning, power steering, and other accessories. A V8 Mustang with all available options would cost about 60% more than a basic model with a six-cylinder engine, which made it an extremely profitable model for Ford.

The requirements were therefore set:
  • Attractive, sporty styling
  • Affordable base price
  • Extensive options, including six-cylinder and V8 engines
  • Aggressive, youth-oriented marketing and advertising.
While most of the pony cars offered more powerful engines and performance packages, enough to qualify some into muscle car territory, a substantial number were sold with six-cylinder engines or ordinary V8s. For the most part, the high-performance models saw limited sales.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pony_car

The new Camaro and Challenger are modern Pony Cars, most of the cars you are listing are NOT PONY CARS.

The Mustang has always been the "original" Pony Car and it still is the preeminent a Pony Car.
You offered a definition of a "pony car". What everyone here is saying is that these cars are it's competition. Many buyers would consider those other cars while also considering a Mustang, so I don't see where your argument comes from.
Old 10/31/08, 12:05 PM
  #514  
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
MBK's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the argument was changed midway by the guy who defined competitor for black GT500 when he already had his own definition of competitor, pony cars
Old 10/31/08, 12:29 PM
  #515  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MBK
the argument was changed midway by the guy who defined competitor for black GT500 when he already had his own definition of competitor, pony cars
I understand but perhaps he should have stated it's class or segment. Though the Accord, Altima, RX8, 350Z and G35 are not traditional "pony cars" they are the Mustang's competition. Like the Mustang they are coupes with a stylish look, decent power and handling within more or less the same price range.

I think the main difference in performance between the Asian and US cars is that the Americans focus more on power and acceleration while the Asians focus more on overall handling.
Old 10/31/08, 06:36 PM
  #516  
Mach 1 Member
 
Black GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2008
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
WE HAVE A WINNER!

Exactly, WE HAVE A WINNER!


Thanks for playing Folks, next time please do try and follow along...


You may exit to the rear...



Originally Posted by MBK
the argument was changed midway by the guy who defined competitor for black GT500 when he already had his own definition of competitor, pony cars
Old 10/31/08, 06:41 PM
  #517  
Cobra Member
 
GT5088's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 29, 2007
Location: smallest state in the union.
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have alot of friends that have imports as mentioned above, and I don't consider any of them at any point in time to ever purchase or think about purchasing a mustang. They are more into light, better handling cars with more european styling cues. Now me, I like a car that forces me into my seat when I put the pedal to the floor, but thats just me.
Old 11/1/08, 07:38 AM
  #518  
Legacy TMS Member Pr
 
edumspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: PR
Posts: 5,637
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by rhumb
You might also want to throw in the new Hyundai Coupe as it is, in 3.8 form, a RWD 2+2 sport coupe with more HP than a Stang GT and arguably better brakes and suspension (Brembos and IRS). I don't doubt that there will be some cross shopping outside of each makes own fanboys. Now if Hyundai would drop that nice 4.6 in the thing, that would really shake up the Pony Car market with its first serious foreign V8 contender, but I don't think Hyundai has enough spine for that sort of bold move.
Hyundai's Coupe (Genesis i think is called) will offer two good engines. The basic and mid trim will have a turbo 2.0L four cyl at 220 hp and the premium will have a 310 hp 3.8L V6
Here are more details.
And a sedan version is offered too, with an optional 4.6L V8 in Europe by the moment
Old 11/2/08, 12:40 PM
  #519  
Mach 1 Member
 
Pwny's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 4, 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by edumspeed
Hyundai's Coupe (Genesis i think is called) will offer two good engines. The basic and mid trim will have a turbo 2.0L four cyl at 220 hp and the premium will have a 310 hp 3.8L V6
Here are more details.
And a sedan version is offered too, with an optional 4.6L V8 in Europe by the moment
It sounds like its going to be a great car, but I just couldn't drive a Hyundai.
Old 11/2/08, 04:53 PM
  #520  
Cobra R Member
 
97GT03SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pwny
It sounds like its going to be a great car, but I just couldn't drive a Hyundai.
Thats to bad, perceptions like that is why so many people refuse to buy Ford and GM vehicles despite their much improved quality.


Quick Reply: What's the BFD with IRS?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 PM.