2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

New Motor Trend 3-way comparison is up...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/6/10 | 02:58 AM
  #121  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Kevindust
I agree with you there...I think C&D called the new Chally a 5/4 version of the original...if they had scaled it down instead of scaling it up, it would probably appeal to me a lot more.
That sounds about right...



Old 4/6/10 | 04:19 AM
  #122  
PaulVincent's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2010
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Congratulations!

I realize Unions have at times gotten excessive - just like Corporation profits are now since Unions have diminished. But I bet many don't realize how many benefits ALL workers have received from the results of "collective bargaining". Such as a 40 hr work week.

Much of the financial problems with families today are because real wages haven't kept up with inflation for decades now. And that's because the pendulum was swung waaay to far in favor of the Corporations and their profits, and away from workers needing "family wage jobs".

Even the healthcare issue is because of diminished Unions. Back in the day it was common for companies to provide health & welfare benefits, and that served to keep employees long term that have skills and loyalty.

In contrast, look at today. Good luck getting healthcare much less a pension. And so we have huge turnover, no loyalty, and taxpayer funded healthcare.
Read about what Henry Ford did for his employees in 1913 without unions (doubled their wages). It was so revolutionary that their was a Congressional investigation about it all. Yes, doubled (from less than $2.50/day to a $5.00/day) wage. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Last edited by PaulVincent; 4/6/10 at 12:00 PM.
Old 4/6/10 | 05:04 AM
  #123  
Skotty's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2010
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: KC, MO
Do they run them with full tanks? If so, that's one place where the Mustang saves a few pounds in testing. I wish it had a 19 gallon tank like the others though.
Old 4/6/10 | 06:42 AM
  #124  
SCARIER's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 2, 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
12.7 for the GT? I remember reading 12.8 sec for the Shelby GT500. The GT is faster is the quarter mile than the Shelby? I might have to put my dream of owning a Shelby on hold.
Old 4/6/10 | 07:18 AM
  #125  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
I would bet the drivers didn't take the GT out of 3rd/4th the whole time they had the car. They've driven an SS and the SRT8 before; nothing new to them. This new GT, I'm sure they wanted to drive the crap out of it. And I'm willing to bet the new engine just begs you to. I'm also sure the rated MPG is attainable. But when it's new, you all who have 5.0s on order know dang well you're going to be flogging them for the first few weeks!
Old 4/6/10 | 07:27 AM
  #126  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by SCARIER
12.7 for the GT? I remember reading 12.8 sec for the Shelby GT500. The GT is faster is the quarter mile than the Shelby? I might have to put my dream of owning a Shelby on hold.
That Shelby # is BS...its faster than that.
03/04 Cobra's were running that stock, and the GT500 is faster... IF you can get traction.

That seems to be the #1 complaint, so its no wonder that people have a hard time launching those cars.
Old 4/6/10 | 07:56 AM
  #127  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Originally Posted by Boomer
That Shelby # is BS...its faster than that.
03/04 Cobra's were running that stock, and the GT500 is faster... IF you can get traction.

That seems to be the #1 complaint, so its no wonder that people have a hard time launching those cars.
yep with all that torque down low with the blower it is instant tire smoke in 1 and 2nd gear. My 03 cobra was the same way with pulley etc. If you can drive it it will run amazing times, however if you cannot you run 13 sec times
Old 4/6/10 | 08:05 AM
  #128  
Falc'man's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
I'm over this. Should they be even comparing the Mustang to these barges? Where's the M3?
Old 4/6/10 | 08:07 AM
  #129  
novicius's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 19, 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: madtown
Originally Posted by Falc'man
I'm over this. Should they be even comparing the Mustang to these barges? Where's the M3?
This.
Old 4/6/10 | 09:34 AM
  #130  
tmclaugh's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by PaulVincent
Read about what Henry Ford did for his employees in 1913 without unions (doubled their wages). It was so revolutionary that their was a Congressional investigation about it all. Yes, doubled (from less than $2.50/day to a $5.00/day wage. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Ford believed his workers should be able to buy his cars. He also used a race to the top mentality to attract and retain the best employees. Pay better than everyone else and provide them with non-monetary compensation like health care and pensions. Some companies still subscribe to this. See Google or SAS. Most I don't think do so anymore.

I grew up on Long Island which was home to Grumman and had an uncle who worked there. Grumman was the only defense aerospace contractor which didn't unionize and according to what I was watching it was because of the compensation the company provided to its employees. I asked my uncle about this and he said it was great there. He said he never bought a power tool when he worked at Grumman. When he needed something he signed it out from the company and brought it back when he was done.

tom
Old 4/6/10 | 09:52 AM
  #131  
windsor202's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 2, 2009
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by eci
It isn't 1910 anymore. What once saved it is now destroying it. My problem isn't with the workers so much as it is the gangster thugs who run the Unions. The workers are innocent bystanders for the most part. Why anyone would want to work somewhere where you are rewarded for seniority and not performance is beyond me. Lookup what the California Teachers Union has done to CA sometime. As for higher standard of living, ever been to Detroit? LOL! Keep supporting the UAW while they bankrupt the Big 3 into oblivion.
Old 4/6/10 | 09:56 AM
  #132  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SCARIER
12.7 for the GT? I remember reading 12.8 sec for the Shelby GT500. The GT is faster is the quarter mile than the Shelby? I might have to put my dream of owning a Shelby on hold.
MM&FF with Evan Smith ran a 11.95 @120mph with Crapyears on the car. More important than ET in this equation is mph. The Shelby runs almost 10mph faster through the 1320 than the 2011 GT.

Dave
Old 4/6/10 | 09:57 AM
  #133  
MBK's Avatar
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
12.7...
Old 4/6/10 | 12:02 PM
  #134  
PaulVincent's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2010
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tmclaugh
Ford believed his workers should be able to buy his cars. He also used a race to the top mentality to attract and retain the best employees. Pay better than everyone else and provide them with non-monetary compensation like health care and pensions. Some companies still subscribe to this. See Google or SAS. Most I don't think do so anymore.

I grew up on Long Island which was home to Grumman and had an uncle who worked there. Grumman was the only defense aerospace contractor which didn't unionize and according to what I was watching it was because of the compensation the company provided to its employees. I asked my uncle about this and he said it was great there. He said he never bought a power tool when he worked at Grumman. When he needed something he signed it out from the company and brought it back when he was done.

tom
Interesting. I knew of Grumman, but I didn't know the info that you provided. Thanks.
Old 4/6/10 | 12:19 PM
  #135  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
im union and we do more than conservative media says for teh american worker. you corporate america has shipped jobs overseas and look where we are. blame the american worker for wanting a good wage and a better life.


chang in china appreciates all of your jobs. i have mine because of union brothers keep the monopolies from .50 cents an hour.
Old 4/6/10 | 01:17 PM
  #136  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
So back to the topic at hand.... ehem...
Old 4/6/10 | 01:30 PM
  #137  
MBK's Avatar
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
challenger is nice. if you are looking for a big car with a smoothe drive, then its a good choice. the only problem is that they need to put the 6.1 in the RT.
Old 4/6/10 | 01:36 PM
  #138  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
I think the Challenger is more of a Grand Touring car and maybe should not even be compared with the GT and SS. I guess if you really take the Challenger for what it is it fits the mold great.
Old 4/6/10 | 02:23 PM
  #139  
kjacobson351's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2005
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Twin Falls, ID
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
I think the Challenger is more of a Grand Touring car and maybe should not even be compared with the GT and SS. I guess if you really take the Challenger for what it is it fits the mold great.
+1! it is a fantastic car, I would love to drive accross the country in this thing much more than I would want to in a GT or SS. But if you are going to offer a car with a performance package that costs so much, it had better perform. Last time I checked the consumer does not like to pay more for less : /

It's clear the challenger is more car than the other two, it's just a different kind.
Old 4/6/10 | 03:55 PM
  #140  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
I like the Challenger and based on looks alone my favorite. Its just so big/heavy. The size does equal comfort on the highway. It also has a big trunk and back seat. I like the Mustang more as a total package.


Quick Reply: New Motor Trend 3-way comparison is up...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 PM.