2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

New Information on the 5L, DI and 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/25/08 | 05:57 PM
  #81  
Jeffs08GT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: February 28, 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Greeley, CO
Originally Posted by max2000jp
The cost will definitely rise. You are adding a brand new “high tech” engine along with a 6 speed manual. Ford has to pass the cost onto the consumer.
I'm not necessarily sure it will rise much. We don't know how much more (if any) this engine will cost to manufacture over the current 3V motor. I'm still having a really hard time seeing a 400hp GT though. I would love too but this just screams SE to me right now.
Old 4/25/08 | 11:33 PM
  #82  
97GT03SVT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 27, 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
I feel Ford is going to have to make it cost around the same as the current car. Between the upcoming competition and the economy Ford is gonna have a much tougher time with this next body style even if the specs are awesome! I also feel that this next car will get better gas mileage too, My friend's 06' GT gets better mileage than my lowly 97GT (with 85 less HP) No matter how it shakes out I'm in the process of buying a house so my 97' GT and 03' Cobra are gonna be the last stangs I own for a while
Old 4/26/08 | 03:54 AM
  #83  
DrunkenDragon713's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
I'd like to see (not sure if anyone posted this yet, since I dont wanna read through 8 pages to see) is the SEFI 5.0 in the base GT, and the DI 5.0 in the SE. Boss, Mach, Shelby, any of them would be fit for the DI 5.0. 50 more hp and tq, slap a race tune and a couple bolt ons we could easily crack out close to 500.

Welcome to the pony wars ladies and gentlemen!
Old 4/26/08 | 04:03 AM
  #84  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
Eights,
I certainly understand the point you are making, but there is one thing you are over looking. Do you think Ford could or would sell a 400hp Mustang under $34k?
Answer: NO

If & when we see a 350-400hp Mustang, Ford is going to rape us! Guarantee it! Don't blame inflation either, because GM was still producing 400hp GTO's in 2006.
Highly unlikely that a 400HP Stang will sell for less than $34K.

And there were still less GTOs (not counting the Holden and Vauxhall equivalents) made than S197s...and when they arrived they stickered for more than GTs (the later discounts notwithstanding). Bottom line: a niche car, just as are all 400HP cars.

And either way, 400HP is gonna cost you more insurance - it's just how the business works. And Ford knows full well that will reduce the number of potential buyers.

Thus, I don't see a 400HP GT happening in '10. Too good to be true.
Old 4/26/08 | 10:37 AM
  #85  
Den's Avatar
Den
GT Member
 
Joined: July 22, 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
I agree with some of the things you said, but Ford has to offer a product that is equal or greater than the competition.
There are cheaper, less hp, FWD Asian Coupes that are nearly as fast as the 300hp Mustang GT. That really bothers me.
I hear you. It really bugs me too. The good part however is that competition is good for making cars better. Heck even back in 1993 when I was driving around in my 93 GT, the Nissan 300 ZX twin turbo could wipe its azz on me. Then the Toyota Supra came out. Those guys were not playing around. But thats were the heads, cam, intake, and procharger came in. Soon I had nothing to worry about anymore (except for credit card bills).

Most of the imports back then sold to one type of person. People who just wanted great reliable transportation with not a lot of interest in hot rods. Times have indeed changed.
Old 4/26/08 | 04:35 PM
  #86  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,294
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
Highly unlikely that a 400HP Stang will sell for less than $34K.

And there were still less GTOs (not counting the Holden and Vauxhall equivalents) made than S197s...and when they arrived they stickered for more than GTs (the later discounts notwithstanding). Bottom line: a niche car, just as are all 400HP cars.

And either way, 400HP is gonna cost you more insurance - it's just how the business works. And Ford knows full well that will reduce the number of potential buyers.

Thus, I don't see a 400HP GT happening in '10. Too good to be true.
I must respectfully disagree for this reason. Ford desperately needs to compete with the upcoming 365/400HP base V8 Camaro, along with the 375HP base 5.7L Challenger R/T

Otherwise from a performance standpoint, the Mustang will be left behind by the competition all over again !
Old 4/26/08 | 07:26 PM
  #87  
goesfast's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
Bzzzzzzzz
Wrong
Sorry, I was refering to the 400hp SE Mustang that everyone so desperately wants, not the base GT. You won't pick this up for cheap (and don't forget the ADM's). People keep saying that Ford has some "serious" competition with regards to competing hp numbers from the Camaro and Challenger. Er, did everyone forget the GT500? And Mustangs have almost always been outgunned by the competition, with lower hpowered engines. Overall performance, affordability,appeal and balance have made the Mustang the success story it is. Even with the advent of higher rumoured hp numbers from these cars, a base GT will hang pretty close to these two and that's before any tweaking or engine change for 2010. The Camaro and Challenger are quite hefty and need this massive hp, just like the GT500.
Old 4/26/08 | 10:59 PM
  #88  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
So you are still saying the GT won't have a 400hp 5.0 4v in 2010/2011?

Care to go into detail, considering so many known insiders are saying otherwise?

Last edited by Boomer; 4/26/08 at 11:03 PM.
Old 4/26/08 | 11:27 PM
  #89  
Moosetang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
So you are still saying the GT won't have a 400hp 5.0 4v in 2010/2011?

Care to go into detail, considering so many known insiders are saying otherwise?
Bad news, 4cam just changed his info:

New ****ty news. Like DBK said, the part about the new motor (not 6.2 but 5.0L 4v) is true. The GT won't get it until MY '11 or CY '10 instead of MY '11. I guess they're going to try to sell the '10 on the styling refresh alone.
Old 4/26/08 | 11:54 PM
  #90  
Berol's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Moosetang
Bad news, 4cam just changed his info:
Sales for MY 2010 will be very low if this is true.
Old 4/27/08 | 12:00 AM
  #91  
Kyle2k's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
I simply can't believe it. Why would there be so many mules out testing for the sole purpose of a face lift? There has to be something more mechanical centered for there to be so many mules out. Unless, thats indeed what they are testing it for (the 5.0) but just want to take an extra year of development to mak it perfect?
Old 4/27/08 | 12:35 AM
  #92  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,294
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by goesfast
Sorry, I was refering to the 400hp SE Mustang that everyone so desperately wants, not the base GT. You won't pick this up for cheap (and don't forget the ADM's). People keep saying that Ford has some "serious" competition with regards to competing hp numbers from the Camaro and Challenger. Er, did everyone forget the GT500? And Mustangs have almost always been outgunned by the competition, with lower hpowered engines. Overall performance, affordability,appeal and balance have made the Mustang the success story it is. Even with the advent of higher rumoured hp numbers from these cars, a base GT will hang pretty close to these two and that's before any tweaking or engine change for 2010. The Camaro and Challenger are quite hefty and need this massive hp, just like the GT500.
You seem to forget the entry level Z-28 Camaro, and 5.7L Challenger R/T will be competing directly with the Mustang GT. Meanwhile the GT500 will compete head to head with the 425HP SRT8 Challenger, and Camaro SS respectively.

That being said, it's already been confirmed by several Ford insiders including 4cam, that the 400HP 5.0L will indeed be included in the 2011 Mustang GT !
Old 4/27/08 | 01:02 AM
  #93  
Black331's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, Ca
Originally Posted by goesfast
That's right. We'll pay for this new Mustang's redesign and power through the nose. Then, everyone will complain about the price..................The GT500 will probably be gone when the introduction of the 400hp+ SE Mustang arrives, just so the GT500 won't be shamed in performance.
The late GTO's were bolted to showroom floors due to high pricing and bland looks. The new G8 looks much nicer and performs just as good with a lower hp engine and lower MSRP. Pontiac has a winner here. Best performance under $30,000 is the latest selling point.

I hate to break it to you, but the GT500 isn't going anywhere, bank on it, and a 400 horse GT will be the thing getting spanked by the GT500, so no worries about that, the GT500 will always be top dog.

Do you really believe the same Ford that is making 400 horse motor for the GT will just leave the GT500 alone?
Old 4/27/08 | 01:07 AM
  #94  
Black331's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, Ca
The Camaro is rumored to get as much as 430 horsepower out of the LS3, and the Challenger is rumored to get as much as 440, so that's what the GT has to compete against next year, just saying..
Old 4/27/08 | 01:10 AM
  #95  
Kyle2k's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Not to mention the fact that the Gen V will surely be out to compete with Fords new DI 5.0 when it does come out as well. Its odd though. I still can't get over the fact that GM is still using pushrods, but combining it with DI, it just seems...well, odd. lol
Old 4/27/08 | 01:10 AM
  #96  
3Mach1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Berol
Sales for MY 2010 will be very low if this is true.
Yep, I agree. Why does it take Ford so long to design an engine? They are light years behind GM in trucks because the 5.4 cant cut it against the 6.0 and now 6.2. Amazing, just amazing. Camaro sales just got a boost for 2010.
Old 4/27/08 | 01:17 AM
  #97  
Black331's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, Ca
Originally Posted by chevys
Yep, I agree. Why does it take Ford so long to design an engine? They are light years behind GM in trucks because the 5.4 cant cut it against the 6.0 and now 6.2. Amazing, just amazing. Camaro sales just got a boost for 2010.

That's something that's had me scratching my head for years, it took them forever to get the D35 out, by the time the 6.2 arrives in the trucks I believe it will be 11 years in the making. It's rather embarrassing, I believe Kia and Daihatsu have faster engine development times. They are clearly way way behind the close competition, how come the Japanese and even GM can think up a new engine and have it on the road a few short years later, yet Ford takes what seems to average to almost an entire decade to design and build new engines? It's not cold fusion here, ICE engines are very basic, and with a the supercomputer technology available today there is no excuse for Ford's continental drift-like powertrain development times. It's really hurting them, if the 5.0 doesn't debut in the 2010 it's going to take a huge hit, everybody will wait until the 2011 model comes out. Hopefully the new management is addressing this mess!!

Last edited by Black331; 4/27/08 at 01:19 AM.
Old 4/27/08 | 04:54 AM
  #98  
Wolfsburg's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Eh, no 5.0 for the 2010 MY? That's a huge disappointment...
Old 4/27/08 | 09:12 AM
  #99  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Wolfsburg
Eh, no 5.0 for the 2010 MY? That's a huge disappointment...
No big deal, gives me more time to save the $$ for my 2011, 400 HP 5.0 GT.
Old 4/27/08 | 12:11 PM
  #100  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Moosetang
Bad news, 4cam just changed his info:
That's why I said 2010/2011

If you read the info I posted a while ago, the 5.0 wasn't suppose to bow till 2011 anyway. There was a chance at a fast track and having it ready for the 2010MY, but it seems Ford in its infinate wisdom wants to try and get sales on looks alone.



WTG ****!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 AM.