2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

New Information on the 5L, DI and 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/22/08 | 05:22 PM
  #41  
Den's Avatar
Den
GT Member
 
Joined: July 22, 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
1993 had 205 hp (sorry-just had to do it. Really they just changed the way they calculated hp that year).
1993 Cobra had 235 hp

Originally Posted by cobramatt
I think 400 horsepower is just to much of a jump for the base Mustang GT in 2010, the 5.0L is probably for an SE model. Some history of HP for the base Mustang GT.

1986 - 200hp
1987 - 225 hp
1993 - 225 hp
1994 - 215 hp
1996 - 215 hp
1999 - 260 hp
2005 - 300 hp
2010 - More like 315 hp, just my guess

The most horsepower it ever jumped over the last 20 years was 45, so to say it will go from 300 to 400 is just unrealistic. Just my 2 cents.

Last edited by Den; 4/22/08 at 05:24 PM.
Old 4/22/08 | 05:34 PM
  #42  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Ford had the Cobra R engine (5.4 4v) in 2000 hitting 385+ HP
I know it was only in 300 cars,
but at the time, it was more so that Ford wasn't pushing HP like they are now.
Old 4/22/08 | 06:47 PM
  #43  
boduke0220's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2007
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 1
From: North carolina
personally i would be happy with 350 hp or more..anything less is dumb and just.well un-appealling
Old 4/22/08 | 10:40 PM
  #44  
97GT03SVT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 27, 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Den
1993 had 205 hp (sorry-just had to do it. Really they just changed the way they calculated hp that year).
1993 Cobra had 235 hp

That is a nice accurate list you compiled there. Notice how big the jumps have gotten the last couple gens. I don't think that a small bump of just 15HP will get many current gen owners to trade in their cars for that. Not only is Ford trying to outdo the current 05-09 cars but also the new competition from Dodge, GM and Hyundai (Genesis coupe will have 300HP and be under $30,000)! Ford needs to do everything in it's power to keep Mustang sales up, lets face it guys this is the only segment that Ford truly dominates. Though I never automatically go along with rumor mills I think the 400HP 5.0 is feasible in the mainstream GT.
Old 4/22/08 | 11:34 PM
  #45  
cheech6g's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
As far as horsepower goes, it would be great if the GT got 400.....but when put up next to a new Challanger or Camaro, isnt the Mustang MUCH lighter? I dont really know off the top of my head but I've heard both of those cars are supposed to be pretty **** heavy. So even IF the Mustang's power isnt as much as those two......as long as its lighter, it will still manage to compete. I think thats what they should focus more on. But who am I kidding........."400hp Mustang GT" just sounds SOOOOOOOO nice. Just say it outloud a couple times, haha.
Old 4/23/08 | 12:01 AM
  #46  
Mackitraz's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 6, 2007
Posts: 575
Likes: 11
From: Williamsburg, VA
I just got my 08. All this talk is giving me HP envy already! lol
Old 4/23/08 | 09:06 AM
  #47  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Boomer
BlueII is reporting one variant of the 5.0 is 340 (mustang) and there is a TT5.0 variant 500+hp
I know the guy knows a lot and is in the know, and I don't doubt that those engines are testing but...

I think guys quoting the 340-360hp numbers are the F150 variant,
and that the Mustang still stands at 400hp/360

With all the tech and increased bore/stroke size, I cannot see the 5.0 being JUST 340-360...
unless tehy are tuning it to be a torque machine. Which is not the case.

Still sticking with 400hp
and us not seeing a TT version for a while...

From BLUEII
I need to correct myself on this.

The 340 HP 5.0 is for the F-150. Different manifold tuning for torque.

A PFI 5.0 for the Mustang is at 425 HP. Some tech from the FR500 engine.

Again the TTDI 5.0 will come later.

Sorry for the confusion.
Told ya
Old 4/23/08 | 10:16 AM
  #48  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Any word on the suspension/brake front? I’d love to see an IRS rear, but I doubt that will happen. There were rumors of a Watts-Link. Any updates on that? Also, anyone heard anything about brake upgrades? More power is always welcome, but you need to be able to put it to the ground and stop. The brakes and suspension are areas where Ford can make easy improvements for 2010.

Another thing I don't understand is why Ford won't launch the new engine WITH direct injection. The technology is out there, so it's just a matter of implementing it. The benefits to fuel economy and emissions make it a no-braine in a new engine.

Last edited by max2000jp; 4/23/08 at 10:19 AM.
Old 4/23/08 | 10:41 AM
  #49  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
not that it matters but the Ls1 started with 340hp in the 97 vette.
Old 4/23/08 | 12:23 PM
  #50  
Moosetang's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by max2000jp
Any word on the suspension/brake front? I’d love to see an IRS rear, but I doubt that will happen. There were rumors of a Watts-Link. Any updates on that? Also, anyone heard anything about brake upgrades? More power is always welcome, but you need to be able to put it to the ground and stop. The brakes and suspension are areas where Ford can make easy improvements for 2010.
The suspension and brakes will certainly be improved, but very likely that it will stay SRA, at least in the base/GT. The Bullit's a pretty good indicator of how good the GT-level suspension/brakes can get.
Originally Posted by max2000jp
Another thing I don't understand is why Ford won't launch the new engine WITH direct injection. The technology is out there, so it's just a matter of implementing it. The benefits to fuel economy and emissions make it a no-braine in a new engine.
The tech is out there but obtaining it has issues. Number one is that they have to set up supplier chains for DI components and there aren't an infinite number of suppliers doing DI bits. This is why even several premium brands haven't converted 100% to DI yet, despite the advantages.
Old 4/23/08 | 12:47 PM
  #51  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Moosetang
The suspension and brakes will certainly be improved, but very likely that it will stay SRA, at least in the base/GT. The Bullit's a pretty good indicator of how good the GT-level suspension/brakes can get.
The Bullit really isn't much improvement over the standard GT. We need larger front brakes up front with better pads. A watts link would be nice given it's a step above a panhard bar for obvious reasons.

The tech is out there but obtaining it has issues. Number one is that they have to set up supplier chains for DI components and there aren't an infinite number of suppliers doing DI bits. This is why even several premium brands haven't converted 100% to DI yet, despite the advantages.
This is a relatively low volume engine from what I read. Ford should have no issues finding enough supplies for 50K engines annually. Hell, Mazda provides it in three of their vehicle currently.
Old 4/23/08 | 12:50 PM
  #52  
Den's Avatar
Den
GT Member
 
Joined: July 22, 2007
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
300hp Hyundai??? Not me

I know a lot of people out there compare all the horsepower numbers with different makes and models but you know what . . . The other cars are not mustangs. I dont know about you guys but I have owned plenty of stangs in the past (83gt, 86gt, 93gt, 2000gt and a few other brands between each of them. Only a mustang feels like a mustang. When I bought my 2000 GT I took the LS1 Z-28 for a ride and it just wasn't as fun as the mustang. I drove around in a SRT-4 w/ stage 2 turbo upgrade and it was alright but got boring. Mustangs just got that feel that makes me keep coming back for more. Big HP is awesome to have, but thats not the only thing that sells me on a stang.
Old 4/23/08 | 02:04 PM
  #53  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Den
I know a lot of people out there compare all the horsepower numbers with different makes and models but you know what . . . The other cars are not mustangs. I dont know about you guys but I have owned plenty of stangs in the past (83gt, 86gt, 93gt, 2000gt and a few other brands between each of them. Only a mustang feels like a mustang. When I bought my 2000 GT I took the LS1 Z-28 for a ride and it just wasn't as fun as the mustang. I drove around in a SRT-4 w/ stage 2 turbo upgrade and it was alright but got boring. Mustangs just got that feel that makes me keep coming back for more. Big HP is awesome to have, but thats not the only thing that sells me on a stang.
I agree with some of the things you said, but Ford has to offer a product that is equal or greater than the competition.
There are cheaper, less hp, FWD Asian Coupes that are nearly as fast as the 300hp Mustang GT. That really bothers me.
Old 4/23/08 | 02:56 PM
  #54  
goesfast's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
True, non-conventional competitors (Honda, et al) are creeping up with some impressive performance models that can stay with the Mustang GT, but other than the current GT500, Ford has always been the underdog with HP numbers. But yet, the Mustang is still a very popular sports car. More HP is not always the answer. Offering an affordable well-balanced car is. 400 HP sounds nice, but may be over the mark for regular GT's. We'll see......................
Old 4/23/08 | 03:24 PM
  #55  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
400 HP certainly sounds technically possible for the GT, but I wonder about some other things >>

- With oil prices rising sharply - and likely to continue doing so - can this regular GT be made fuel efficient enough to comply with CAFE and emissions standards, particularly if DI is not added to the mix from the get?

- Will a 400 HP base GT be feasible from an insurance standpoint? In other words, might some buyers be unable to purchase one because insurance rates on a 400 HP muscle car will be higher than they would be on the current 300 HP car? Sure, those with the cash can afford it - but this isn't an SE model, this is the bread & butter V8 model designed to appeal to the "average," middle class buyer.

Then there are all the other reasons others here have cited for believing a 400 HP GT is unlikely.

Personally, I think when you analyze the big picture, a 400 HP GT falls into the "If it looks too good to be true...it probably is" category.
Old 4/23/08 | 06:12 PM
  #56  
MustangFanatic's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2004
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Personally, I don't think the GT will produce 400+ hp, that will be reserved for SE editions such as the Boss or Mach I
Old 4/23/08 | 06:41 PM
  #57  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
hahah,
when it comes out, this is going to be awsome...
Old 4/23/08 | 07:10 PM
  #58  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Boomer
hahah,
when it comes out, this is going to be awesome...
The skepticism just makes it that much better.
Old 4/23/08 | 07:14 PM
  #59  
Fords4Ever's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
- Will a 400 HP base GT be feasible from an insurance standpoint? In other words, might some buyers be unable to purchase one because insurance rates on a 400 HP muscle car will be higher than they would be on the current 300 HP car? Sure, those with the cash can afford it - but this isn't an SE model, this is the bread & butter V8 model designed to appeal to the "average," middle class buyer.
Did anyone have trouble insuring Pontiac's 400hp Cavalier...I mean GTO?

Personally I'd be happy with 350-375hp and more effficient would just be icing on the cake!
Old 4/23/08 | 07:28 PM
  #60  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Fords4Ever
Did anyone have trouble insuring Pontiac's 400hp Cavalier...I mean GTO?

Personally I'd be happy with 350-375hp and more effficient would just be icing on the cake!
How many GTOs did they build? How much did they cost?

Answers:

- Less than the Mustang

- More than the Mustang

The GTO was an unsuccessful niche car. Most 400HP cars today are niche vehicles. And it's common knowledge that that much power drives insurance rates up.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.