2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

How will competiton influence the Mustang in the coming years?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 05:48 AM
  #61  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
I think we are going to see some great V8 cars over the next couple of years, and then its going to "dry-up". Enter the V6!

I expect that there will always be an SE Mustang with a V8, but I doubt the Camaro & Challenger will survive. If they do, it will be at limited numbers.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 06:09 AM
  #62  
svopaul's Avatar
Service Manager
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 626
From: Odenville, AL
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
Just an FYI on weights of various late model Mustangs coming from a guy who has owned and weighed several. I have purchased three brand new Mustangs since 2000 and weighed them each with a 1/4 tank gas, no spare tire or jack, but otherwise bone stock when new. I went to the same Washington Dept of Transportation truck scale which is accurate to +/- 20 lbs. With no cargo, driver, or passengers, here is what each of my last three Mustangs weighed....

3,180 lbs = 2000 Mustang GT Coupe, manual trans, SOHC.
3,380 lbs = 2003 Mustang Mach 1, manual trans, DOHC.
3,470 lbs = 2007 Mustang GT Coupe, automatic trans, SOHC.

Ford's specs show that an S197 automatic weighs 180 lbs more than an S197 manual, so a 2007 Mustang GT Coupe with a manual trans, but otherwise identical to my car, should weigh 3,290 lbs. with a 1/4 tank of gas, but I have not personally weighed one to know for sure. Fill the tank up and put the jack and spare back in and it's a little over 3,400 lbs.
This is good info but not real world in my opinion from the way I look at things....good for an undriven car sitting still and lightened but the numbers "I" use are actual driven numbers in that there is no attempt to lighten the car and with driver...simply because a car cannot drive itself...however that can be a big variable which is why my prior comparison showed the exact same conditions and driver on the same scale. Like many other things different people have different methods of approaching things....mine is from a point of "on the road" not just sitting somewhere empty and stripped down. From a performance perspective regarding weight you at least have to include a driver since the cars are not remote control and at least a 1/4 tank of fuel(however you are not going very far)....removing the jack and spare tire at the dragstrip is fine but not very practical for real world useage.

Perhaps we should have and in the future set some parameters for the discussion so as to keep everything on the same level when discussing things that can have a number of variables and different approaches.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #63  
97GT03SVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Anybody know if the future GTO got killed off? I remember hearing rumors that GM was going to make a new gen GTO that was going to be retro inspired and based on a similar platform to the Camaro. I'm now starting to hear rumors than GM is pulling the plug on many RWD cars.... I find this suprising with GM actually starting to turn their company around. I think the only way for the big three to compeat with imports is to build better cars and pulling RWD platforms off the list will only hurt them.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 03:15 AM
  #64  
UnrealFord's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
Originally Posted by svopaul
I disagree....I am a Huge blue oval and Mustang fanatic(look at my signature) but that Challenger is just plain sexy...and if Ford follows that Ugly Italian design with the shetland pony interior then I will be swayed even more toward the Challenger. However I don't buy new cars...I'll let someone else take the initial hit and I'll buy a nice clean used one later as I am not one of the "gotta have it now" types...I have other toys to keep me occupied. The Challenger not being around for 35 years will have no affect on who wants one...it Looks so much like the old ones that it will sell itself for the most part. I know a number of my friends who are Mustang guys who feel the same as I do. Then if Mopar fails it will just become an instant collectible.
My exact thoughts !!11
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #65  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Mustang finished off all these models already(some more then once) by not doing anything different. The market revolves around the Mustang, not the other way around. All these cars are wannabe Mustangs. I don't see any formula coming from the Challenger or Camaro that looks like a threat in any way.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #66  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by svopaul
This is good info but not real world in my opinion from the way I look at things....good for an undriven car sitting still and lightened but the numbers "I" use are actual driven numbers in that there is no attempt to lighten the car and with driver...simply because a car cannot drive itself...however that can be a big variable which is why my prior comparison showed the exact same conditions and driver on the same scale. Like many other things different people have different methods of approaching things....mine is from a point of "on the road" not just sitting somewhere empty and stripped down. From a performance perspective regarding weight you at least have to include a driver since the cars are not remote control and at least a 1/4 tank of fuel(however you are not going very far)....removing the jack and spare tire at the dragstrip is fine but not very practical for real world useage.

Perhaps we should have and in the future set some parameters for the discussion so as to keep everything on the same level when discussing things that can have a number of variables and different approaches.
OK, allow me to try this again. Add 55 lbs for the jack & spare, fill the gas tank (another 75 lbs), and add my 170 lbs to my last three Mustangs to meet your method of comparing weights from a real world useage standpoint and here's what my cars weighed with the additional 300 lbs factored into each...

3,480 lbs = 2000 Mustang GT Coupe, manual trans, SOHC.
3,680 lbs = 2003 Mustang Mach 1, manual trans, DOHC.
3,770 lbs = 2007 Mustang GT Coupe, automatic trans, SOHC.

Point being, cars are getting heavier as more government required safety equipment and market desired luxuries are being added to our Pony cars. I am hopeful that the next generation Mustang can be lightened, or at least kept at bay.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #67  
svopaul's Avatar
Service Manager
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 626
From: Odenville, AL
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
Point being, cars are getting heavier as more government required safety equipment and market desired luxuries are being added to our Pony cars. I am hopeful that the next generation Mustang can be lightened, or at least kept at bay.
OH, there is No doubt or dispute about that!!! The days of the Lightweight stripped 5.0 LX notchback are long gone and will never return...sadly!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #68  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by svopaul
Good point and one that I missed as well.....I think there is some competition from the imports.....and with fewer domestic choices in a Muscle car it wouldn't surprise me for the import mfgs to look into some of that market.

I do think there is a real difference in the type of people who are diehard Muscle car enthusiasts and while that might make it more difficult to sway them into an import performance car...it is not impossible.
Um,

Celica-died a slow agonizing death
Integra/TSX-ditto
Eclipse-still around with hardly anybody buying them
Nissan 350z-only true import 'competitor' (although not often cross-shopped with the Mustang) and has never affected Mustang sales
RX8-abysmal sales #s
Hyundai-fuggedabout it

I guess you could say Evo/Sti but the numbers are so small and again a rarely cross-shopped vehicle and pricing is out of line with Mustang. I don't think the new Impreza is going to help Subrau much for the next 2 years until they have to pull a Tribeca emergency restyle.

There used to be a lot more models from Europe as well that have long disappeared from the US market. Through even the best and worst versions of the Mustang over the years, it has never been knocked from anything less then sheer dominance in the coupe market, not mater how many have hated on it Not to mention the dozens of domestic coupes.

I think most asian import companies are trying to find ways to stay as far away from the 20-28k sport coupe market as possible.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #69  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by svopaul
OH, there is No doubt or dispute about that!!! The days of the Lightweight stripped 5.0 LX notchback are long gone and will never return...sadly!
I used to adore my Fox body cars, but every now and then I get back in one, even perfect ones, and-ugh, forget it, feels like its 50 years old with 3million miles on it.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #70  
svopaul's Avatar
Service Manager
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 626
From: Odenville, AL
Originally Posted by kevinb120
I used to adore my Fox body cars, but every now and then I get back in one, even perfect ones, and-ugh, forget it, feels like its 50 years old with 3million miles on it.

I drive them all from old to new pretty much daily doing what I do and despite the dated feel there is nothing quite like driving a lightweight car with simple bolt-ons that you can put sideways at the blip of the throttle....The new body while nice and refined just doesn't give you that.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #71  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by kevinb120
I used to adore my Fox body cars, but every now and then I get back in one, even perfect ones, and-ugh, forget it, feels like its 50 years old with 3million miles on it.
Yep, l lost interest in my 87 Mustang GT. I sold it about a year and a half ago. Thought it would be better to sell it, and bank the money for a new Mustang.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #72  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by svopaul
I drive them all from old to new pretty much daily doing what I do and despite the dated feel there is nothing quite like driving a lightweight car with simple bolt-ons that you can put sideways at the blip of the throttle....The new body while nice and refined just doesn't give you that.
Lol, crappy rear suspensions do that My 91 LX is now relegated to 1/4 mile duty whenever I get it off the jackstands and fix all the half-assed fiddle-with-it-mods I'vew messed with over the years, I'll have to report back when I get it running, but I'll say this; I sure do miss that signature 5.0 sound. As good as the current cars are, they just dont make noise like those old fox cars did (off road pipe, 2 chamber flows)
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #73  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Mach1mania
My exact thoughts !!11
You Challenger fans better be prepared to dig deep into your wallets. The SRT-8 Challenger is going to sticker for $40 - $42K with gas guzzler tax and destination - and before ADMs.

Assuming the regular 5.7 Hemi Challenger avoids any gas guzzler taxes it will start around $33K - $34K and option up into the high 30s. Plus you better hope they build enough of them to minimize ADMs.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #74  
MustangFanatic's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2004
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by svopaul
I drive them all from old to new pretty much daily doing what I do and despite the dated feel there is nothing quite like driving a lightweight car with simple bolt-ons that you can put sideways at the blip of the throttle....The new body while nice and refined just doesn't give you that.
I'm with you there Paul, my '86 Notch ain't refined but she sure hauls azz
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 04:30 AM
  #75  
Black331's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, Ca
Anybody know the engine for the base V8 Camaro??

I expect the 2010 Gt to be a high 12 second car factory stock..
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #76  
97GT03SVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
I have heard two different rumors one being that the Camaro would get the 400HP 6.0 from the GTO, 05' Vette or the de-tuned 6.0 in the upcoming G8 which is still good for about 360HP. The top model Camaro is rumored to get the Z06's 7.0 making 505 HP. Though I love the Mustang I feel that the Camaro will be the quicker car. I seriously doubt that the next gen GT will break into the 12s....
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #77  
97GT03SVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
I read the new Car & Driver and the stats of the Challenger, though estimates are pretty impressive. Though the car is a little heavier and lacking 75hp in comparison to the GT500 it looks like it will keep up with it on a race track.

Not counting the stupid ADMs...figure they will be gone after a year or two of production

0-60 in 4.9 and the 1/4 in 13.3
sticker price of a SRT8 is $40,158 that is a bit less than the GT500 and the rumor is that it should be a much better handling car than the GT500. If the top dog Challenger undercuts the GT500's MSRP do you guys think the base V8 will undercut the current GT Mustang?

Insiders guess that the base V8 for 09' will be the 5.7 HEMI with 350HP. I can only assume that the current GT won't receive a power increase until the next model comes out. Either way I still expect the GT to be the quicker car because it should be significantly lighter than the Challenger......Just thought i'd pump some life into this topic with some new info......
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 12:08 AM
  #78  
97GT03SVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Also other news I can gather about new Mustang competitors is Hyundai! This car is expected in 09' and is a RWD platform with a 4.6 V8 expected to produce over 300HP! I'm not gonna lie it's a sharp looking car right in the Mustang's price range.

So far it seems at least for the short time to have three legit pony car competitors to the Mustang! I'm optimistic as I feel this will only make Ford work harder to earn our $$$ meaning better cars in the future! Let's hope Ford gives us a little tweak for the 09' GT like they did back in 98'.....maybe 20HP bump to move out the current gen before we get out 10' Mustang!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #79  
Kyle2k's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From the comments of GTJOHN (which I hope aren't true) the GDI mustang doesnt seem to be coming out till 2011, if thats the case, since I want them both anyways...I'll probably end up getting the new v8 camaro and then after med school I can get a gt500 GDI mustang of some sort.... I don't know I hope you are wrong and I hope the GDI comes out sooner than you think.

Any other insiders with some thoughts?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #80  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
I'd listen to GTJohn about the 5.0 DI engine, unless things change.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.