Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Another #8 Failure on 2011 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/28/14, 07:51 AM
  #61  
Mach 1 Member
 
slostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dmhines
I would think that Ford updated your calibration to the latest and greatest when they replaced your engine. Or is your tuner still using ZFK0 for the base tune?
I don't know that, I gave that code to my tuner.

Originally Posted by Automatic 5.0
Math not your strong subject in school?

$.45 x 14 gallons = $6.30 per fill up.

I have money so no worries there. I was sick of putting the "required premium" in my Trans Am for 20 years just to go back and forth to work. Even $6.30 per week doesn't sound too bad but I hate to pay it. What I do not understand is why 93 is now 45 cents more per gallon than regular. It was 20 cents up until a few years ago. I guess that octane is part gold?
I could go around, even if I run my car bone dry I still thing running a 93 tune would be worth it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
64
7/21/16 09:14 AM
Infamous_blackbeard
Introductions
5
10/8/15 10:45 PM
MustangConvert11
'10-14 V6 Modifications
2
9/30/15 08:01 PM
Christopher Fox Wallace
Fox Mustangs
1
9/26/15 11:55 AM



Quick Reply: Another #8 Failure on 2011 5.0



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 AM.