2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Amber Gold Color

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #41  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Cavero
Actually nicer paints do cost more $$$.
How about nicer colors?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #42  
gnat-sum's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 24, 2008
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Cavero
Actually nicer paints do cost more $$$.
You are correct- nicer colors cost more too. Two reasons:

1) Each additional paint color added to the assembly line increases cost. Why? Production downtime switching the paintbooth to spray a different color. There is only 1 paintbooth at AAI, which is why some Mustang colors must be shared w/ Mazda 6 and vice versa. Remember part of Henry Ford's assembly line and price reduction formula for the Model T was "any color they want as long as it's black." Black dried quickly, too.

2) Nicer, premium paints, like the liquid colors you see on BMW, Infiniti, etc, are metallics. This means in order for the panels to match, all pieces must be sprayed in the same direction at the same time, if not the metallic flakes will be oriented in a different direction, reflecting light differently and thus looking like a different color. ( Honda has made this mistake- look at Accord bumpers vs. doors in beige metallic. )

This further increases production downtime, because the body in white ( BIW ) must be painted with the doors, hood, trunklid and bumpers/fascias, even if their "just-in-time" installation is way, way further down the assembly line. This is why you'll notice some metallics are extra-cost options. If not, such as in the Mustang's case, the additional cost is built into the overall car.

Another reason there is sometimes not so great colors- remember, Ford doesn't make the paint, suppliers do. And when you cost cut down the supplier, or accept the lowest bid, you can expect to get what you pay for. Many many time the final paint is way off what the designers actually wanted, because the supplier couldn't formulate the exact paint at the cost Ford was willing to pay.

That said, I like the gold so far, but yes, needs some black stripes like the Mach 1.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #43  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
^very informative!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2008 | 08:19 AM
  #44  
Ice Hawk's Avatar
 
Joined: December 3, 2007
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
BRING BACK SCREAMING YELLOW!!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #45  
T5owner's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by the procrastinator
Didn't TMS just feature the "Goldfinger" Mustang? .
Rather from here ?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #46  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Back in 2000 Ford WAS planning a Mystic Gold mustang
800 were said to be built...colour changed from Gold, Yellow-green spectrum.

Wonder if they'll do a MysticGT500
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #47  
c25sailor's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 9, 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
[quote=WaltM;5618358]I just threw up in my mouth a little.

Yep. Me too. I remember a Green Pinto I had -- and it wasn't Dark Highland. I'm just not into "earth tone" cars.

But mine is Performance White.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #48  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by T5owner
Rather from here ?
Is this real?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kponypower
GT
13
Jun 17, 2020 07:17 AM
NC14GT
Road Trips
43
Sep 10, 2017 04:47 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
Kalel08
GT
2
Sep 29, 2015 03:06 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 AM.