GT500 Automatic
#1
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Auto Transmission string is getting full and some of the content has gone way off topic to include IRS. Ford needs to know that a few people out there, quite a few actually, would love to see the GT500 offered with an Auto Tranny option.
The soon-to-be introduced SVT Sport Trac Adrenalin will have a 390 hp Supercharged 4.6 in it with a newly designed 6-Sp. Auto. The GT500 should be offered with something similar. With Fords' - and it's Premier Auto Group affiliates (Volvo, Jag, Aston Martin, et al) parts bin to choose from - this shouldn't be a problem.
As for a straight-line 6-Sp. Auto or a 6-Sp. Auto with Manushift, keep in mind these would be a lot more viable for actual production versus an SMG-type paddle shift which would likely be very expensive.
So vote carefully, somone at Ford/SVT just might be watching. And 6 Sp. lovers - please keep an open mind. Your tranny's are a definate and us Autoshift guys are just looking for a little "optional" support.
Thanks.
The soon-to-be introduced SVT Sport Trac Adrenalin will have a 390 hp Supercharged 4.6 in it with a newly designed 6-Sp. Auto. The GT500 should be offered with something similar. With Fords' - and it's Premier Auto Group affiliates (Volvo, Jag, Aston Martin, et al) parts bin to choose from - this shouldn't be a problem.
As for a straight-line 6-Sp. Auto or a 6-Sp. Auto with Manushift, keep in mind these would be a lot more viable for actual production versus an SMG-type paddle shift which would likely be very expensive.
So vote carefully, somone at Ford/SVT just might be watching. And 6 Sp. lovers - please keep an open mind. Your tranny's are a definate and us Autoshift guys are just looking for a little "optional" support.
Thanks.
#3
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
What is your problem with having a 6-sp manual as the standard and then an optional automatic (regardless of the type)?
Options are always nice...what one person perceives as being too expensive or unnecesary (e.g. SMG style tranny), another person may view it as a must-have item.
Does it make the standard price of the car go up if Ford offers big$ options like SMG or IRS?
What is your problem with having a 6-sp manual as the standard and then an optional automatic (regardless of the type)?
Options are always nice...what one person perceives as being too expensive or unnecesary (e.g. SMG style tranny), another person may view it as a must-have item.
Does it make the standard price of the car go up if Ford offers big$ options like SMG or IRS?
#4
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 12:01 PM
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
#5
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT+March 31, 2005, 11:43 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ March 31, 2005, 11:43 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 12:01 PM
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
[/b][/quote]
So I guess what you're saying is those of who have physical reasons for not being able to drive a stick are feminine and shouldn't have the opportunity to own a GT500???
#6
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 11:01 AM
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
What is your problem with having a 6-sp manual as the standard and then an optional automatic (regardless of the type)?
Options are always nice...what one person perceives as being too expensive or unnecesary (e.g. SMG style tranny), another person may view it as a must-have item.
Does it make the standard price of the car go up if Ford offers big$ options like SMG or IRS?
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
What is your problem with having a 6-sp manual as the standard and then an optional automatic (regardless of the type)?
Options are always nice...what one person perceives as being too expensive or unnecesary (e.g. SMG style tranny), another person may view it as a must-have item.
Does it make the standard price of the car go up if Ford offers big$ options like SMG or IRS?
#7
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT+March 31, 2005, 11:43 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ March 31, 2005, 11:43 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 12:01 PM
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
[/b][/quote]
So you calling Carroll Shelby feminine? He drives(and always has drove) automatic Shelby Mustangs,he even has a couple of Cobra roadsters with automatics.......But you're the expert,so i guess he's feminine.
If you ever got to meet him(god forbid),would you scold him for liking automatics?
"So,Mr Shelby,you've won Lemans,created the most copied and coveted sports car ever and you've given the mustang the performance credibility it still enjoys to this day,on top of being the world's longest living heart transplant survivor........BUT....you're just a big ole girl because you prefer not to change your own gears."
:nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:
:notnice: :notnice:
Your attitude goes against the whole meaning of the Ford Mustang. Something for everybody,mild to wild. Don't like a automatic,don't BUY ONE,simple as that. Next you'll be telling us what's a REAL mustang and what's not. :bang:
#8
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@March 31, 2005, 12:43 PM
How about because it is boring, detrimental to driver alertness, and less handling control. And at this time I'll even refrain from mentioning it is feminine.
How about because it is boring, detrimental to driver alertness, and less handling control. And at this time I'll even refrain from mentioning it is feminine.
"Detrimental to driver alertness"....Detrimental??? Really, huh? ...You are a close-minded idiot
And what's so boring/feminine about a SMG style shifter?
(By the way, if you say that you are going to refrain from mentioning something, then please refrain from it.)
EDIT: I just looked at your avatar..."The Diplomatic, Experienced, and Politically Correct Voice of TMS". ...Is that supposed to be a joke?
#9
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by TomServo92@March 31, 2005, 1:32 PM
... those of who have physical reasons...
... those of who have physical reasons...
Are you suggesting the physical impaired should be driving a muscle car... with almost 500hp?
#10
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT+March 31, 2005, 1:52 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ March 31, 2005, 1:52 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-TomServo92@March 31, 2005, 1:32 PM
... those of who have physical reasons...
... those of who have physical reasons...
Are you suggesting the physical impaired should be driving a muscle car... with almost 500hp?
[/b][/quote]
I didn't say physically impaired. I said physical reasons for not driving a stick (knee problems in my case).
#12
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 2:16 PM
...You are a close-minded idiot...
...You are a close-minded idiot...
Really? Then explain why you are the one who is upset and aggravated.
#13
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by TomServo92@March 31, 2005, 2:59 PM
... I said physical reasons for not driving a stick (knee problems in my case).
... I said physical reasons for not driving a stick (knee problems in my case).
#14
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT+March 31, 2005, 3:05 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ March 31, 2005, 3:05 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 2:16 PM
...You are a close-minded idiot...
...You are a close-minded idiot...
Really? Then explain why you are the one who is upset and aggravated.
[/b][/quote]
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.
#17
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT+March 31, 2005, 2:11 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ March 31, 2005, 2:11 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-TomServo92@March 31, 2005, 2:59 PM
... I said physical reasons for not driving a stick (knee problems in my case).
... I said physical reasons for not driving a stick (knee problems in my case).
[/b][/quote]
???? :scratch:
#18
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Location: Hurricane,wv/Cinn,OH,Mooresville,NC
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92+March 31, 2005, 12:32 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TomServo92 @ March 31, 2005, 12:32 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
How about because it is boring, detrimental to driver alertness, and less handling control. And at this time I'll even refrain from mentioning it is feminine.
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@March 31, 2005, 11:43 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman
<!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman
@March 31, 2005, 12:01 PM
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
I don't understand why would any one vote for "6-sp manual ONLY".
How about because it is boring, detrimental to driver alertness, and less handling control. And at this time I'll even refrain from mentioning it is feminine.
[/b][/quote]
You shouldn't say that to people are baby broomers that remember the old 500GTs their
reflexs are not has fast they were younger that whats GT500 but who's needs a auto. :nono:
#19
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 3:14 PM
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.
BTW, the paperback is only $4.99.
#20
Originally posted by clintoris@March 31, 2005, 3:18 PM
I wouldn't do an auto because one can controll the body roll better by feathering a clutch than you can with an auto... it's safer in my opinion.
I wouldn't do an auto because one can controll the body roll better by feathering a clutch than you can with an auto... it's safer in my opinion.
But after noticing that (at the time of this writing) 13 people voted to have a manual tranny ONLY, with no other options... I was just looking for someone to explain why they have a problem with Ford offering different tranny options. I understand there are some die hard manual tranny guys (self included), but why would you care if someone else opted to pay extra $$$ for an auto?
I am all for options...heck, I don't care if Ford offers a towing package. So long as it doesn't effect the price of the base price.