GT500 Automatic
Originally posted by Auburnman+March 31, 2005, 2:31 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Auburnman @ March 31, 2005, 2:31 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-clintoris@March 31, 2005, 3:18 PM
I wouldn't do an auto because one can controll the body roll better by feathering a clutch than you can with an auto... it's safer in my opinion.
I wouldn't do an auto because one can controll the body roll better by feathering a clutch than you can with an auto... it's safer in my opinion.
But after noticing that (at the time of this writing) 13 people voted to have a manual tranny ONLY, with no other options... I was just looking for someone to explain why they have a problem with Ford offering different tranny options. I understand there are some die hard manual tranny guys (self included), but why would you care if someone else opted to pay extra $$$ for an auto?
I am all for options...heck, I don't care if Ford offers a towing package. So long as it doesn't effect the price of the base price.
[/b][/quote]
true, I did post my opinion... I even thought twice before I did... I wasn't missing your point, I guess I just thought it'd be ok to explian why I voted the way I did. Perhaps I should have voted otherwise, because it really makes no difference to me what people buy.... I know I'd only buy a manual. I guess as long as Ford doesn't allocate trannies on a 70/30% auto bias like they did the GTs... I would just hate to be in a position where I can't get an manual when I buy one because there aren't any available... I think most people would prefer to have the manual. but, then again... I just said "think," and that usually gets me into trouble.
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT+March 31, 2005, 3:30 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1 BULLITT @ March 31, 2005, 3:30 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 3:14 PM
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.

BTW, the paperback is only $4.99.

[/b][/quote]
What does that have to do with the price of chicken in China.
We're talking about tranny options and this fool is lecturing us about word definitions. You must be one of those childish type that likes to argue for the sake of arguing.

You can qoute me all you want and reply with your off-topic, smartass remarks, but I'm finished talking with you.
Back to the topic at hand....
Originally posted by Auburnman+March 31, 2005, 2:47 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Auburnman @ March 31, 2005, 2:47 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
The key to the treasure in expressing one's self is the Webster's Dictionary. "Imposing" does not relate to "stating" or even "persuading", not in the least, not even remotely.
BTW, the paperback is only $4.99.

Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@March 31, 2005, 3:30 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman
<!--QuoteBegin-Auburnman
@March 31, 2005, 3:14 PM
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.
Why don't you explain it for me...you're the one who likes to impose your opinion on others.

The key to the treasure in expressing one's self is the Webster's Dictionary. "Imposing" does not relate to "stating" or even "persuading", not in the least, not even remotely.
BTW, the paperback is only $4.99.

We're talking about tranny options and this fool is lecturing us about word definitions. You must be one of those childish type that likes to argue for the sake of arguing.

You can qoute me all you want and reply with your off-topic, smartass remarks, but I'm finished talking with you.
Back to the topic at hand....
[/b][/quote]
Calm down. He's just messing with you. Don't take it seriously.
Originally posted by clintoris@March 31, 2005, 3:46 PM
true, I did post my opinion... I even thought twice before I did... I wasn't missing your point, I guess I just thought it'd be ok to explian why I voted the way I did. Perhaps I should have voted otherwise, because it really makes no difference to me what people buy.... I know I'd only buy a manual. I guess as long as Ford doesn't allocate trannies on a 70/30% auto bias like they did the GTs... I would just hate to be in a position where I can't get an manual when I buy one because there aren't any available... I think most people would prefer to have the manual. but, then again... I just said "think," and that usually gets me into trouble.
true, I did post my opinion... I even thought twice before I did... I wasn't missing your point, I guess I just thought it'd be ok to explian why I voted the way I did. Perhaps I should have voted otherwise, because it really makes no difference to me what people buy.... I know I'd only buy a manual. I guess as long as Ford doesn't allocate trannies on a 70/30% auto bias like they did the GTs... I would just hate to be in a position where I can't get an manual when I buy one because there aren't any available... I think most people would prefer to have the manual. but, then again... I just said "think," and that usually gets me into trouble.
But you actually brought up a good point about the allocation of cars with the various options.
Originally posted by TomServo92@March 31, 2005, 3:49 PM
Calm down. He's just messing with you. Don't take it seriously.
Calm down. He's just messing with you. Don't take it seriously.
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member





Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally posted by Auburnman@March 31, 2005, 3:47 PM
We're talking about tranny options and this fool is lecturing us about word definitions...
We're talking about tranny options and this fool is lecturing us about word definitions...
To reply, get personal, and prove yourself the idiot in just two posts was all your doing, a truly amazing feat.
offer it with a auto and a stick no paddle. This is a Mustang (muscle car) we dont need any Euro advanced technology in our tranny's just give us the normal choice STICK or Auto (for grandparents and people without left legs)
Originally posted by 63galaxie@March 31, 2005, 6:06 PM
i think if you buy a high performance car, you need a high performance tranny, you dont buy this car for the luxury of it
i think if you buy a high performance car, you need a high performance tranny, you dont buy this car for the luxury of it
After reading down this thread I was a little nervous about posting my opinion. I think Ford should offer both options. I have a couple personal reasons why and they are personal. One, this is my third GT but first to have an auto. The auto in the 05 GT is just awsome and I love it, it gives me everthing I need in performance. I am not against manuals at all, I just chose the auto. because it didn't let me down performance wise.
Second, my wife loves the look, as I do of the 07 Cobra concept. The door is open now for selling the 05 and possibly purchasing a Cobra. If the Cobra's price points are within reason and the 05 is paid off or close to payoff it may be a go. Thats why I want options, I want to be able to choose which tranny to have in the car. Just a guys opinion and reasoning.
Second, my wife loves the look, as I do of the 07 Cobra concept. The door is open now for selling the 05 and possibly purchasing a Cobra. If the Cobra's price points are within reason and the 05 is paid off or close to payoff it may be a go. Thats why I want options, I want to be able to choose which tranny to have in the car. Just a guys opinion and reasoning.
Originally posted by BEACHBOY@March 31, 2005, 7:25 PM
After reading down this thread I was a little nervous about posting my opinion.
After reading down this thread I was a little nervous about posting my opinion.
I'm happy to say that I voted for a manual transmission only. I'd love to say that I have some great reasons for the vote, but I really don't.
I consider the Cobra a specialty vehicle... a limited-edition, high-performance vehicle, and personally, I feel that a limited-edition, high-performance muscle car should have a manual transmission (like the Viper).
Emphasis on muscle car... obviously the Ferraris and Porsches of the world offer paddle shifters. For me, muscle car, raw power, manual tranny.
No offense to those who want a automatic... just my opinion.
Originally posted by RMac@March 31, 2005, 8:03 PM
No offense to those who want a manual... just my opinion.
No offense to those who want a manual... just my opinion.
Originally posted by TomServo92+March 31, 2005, 8:06 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TomServo92 @ March 31, 2005, 8:06 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-RMac@March 31, 2005, 8:03 PM
No offense to those who want a manual... just my opinion.
No offense to those who want a manual... just my opinion.
[/b][/quote]
lmao... see, i even confused myself. go me!
thanks.
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member





Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally posted by RMac@March 31, 2005, 9:03 PM
... I feel that a limited-edition, high-performance muscle car should have a manual transmission (like the Viper)...
... I feel that a limited-edition, high-performance muscle car should have a manual transmission (like the Viper)...
I voted manual with automatic optional.
I bought the GT with automatic. Why? Several reasons, all of them my own. That is why I love America. We have the ability to make the choice on just about anything in our lives.
My question (and I admit to being new to this so flame away if you will) is what is so bad about an automatic in a high performance car? I haven't taken mine to the quarter-mile (yet), but it is a very smooth and powerfully shifting transmission, and I feel more than at ease about its ability to handle the occasional high-speed run.
As others stated, there are many people who are unable to drive a manual. Should they be excluded from being able to enjoy what is probably going to be the most exciting performance car of this decade? Not at all! Nothing impairs their ability to control and handle the car, just that they cannot shift their own gears. So what's the harm?
I simply do not get the whole "automatics are for wussies" feeling that I've seen here and there. Simply because I do not wish to shift my own gears, for whatever reason, does not make me more or less of a person or my '05 more or less of a car.
Again, as was stated, having the automatic available as an option will not affect your ability to purchase one with a manual. Point well taken about the allocation percentages, but I have the feeling that Ford would market this model more towards the serious power-drivers who prefer sticks anyway, so the percentages would probably be biased towards manuals. I would probably have more trouble finding the auto version!
Just my $.02.
*ducks the incoming flame-storm...*
I bought the GT with automatic. Why? Several reasons, all of them my own. That is why I love America. We have the ability to make the choice on just about anything in our lives.
My question (and I admit to being new to this so flame away if you will) is what is so bad about an automatic in a high performance car? I haven't taken mine to the quarter-mile (yet), but it is a very smooth and powerfully shifting transmission, and I feel more than at ease about its ability to handle the occasional high-speed run.
As others stated, there are many people who are unable to drive a manual. Should they be excluded from being able to enjoy what is probably going to be the most exciting performance car of this decade? Not at all! Nothing impairs their ability to control and handle the car, just that they cannot shift their own gears. So what's the harm?
I simply do not get the whole "automatics are for wussies" feeling that I've seen here and there. Simply because I do not wish to shift my own gears, for whatever reason, does not make me more or less of a person or my '05 more or less of a car.
Again, as was stated, having the automatic available as an option will not affect your ability to purchase one with a manual. Point well taken about the allocation percentages, but I have the feeling that Ford would market this model more towards the serious power-drivers who prefer sticks anyway, so the percentages would probably be biased towards manuals. I would probably have more trouble finding the auto version!
Just my $.02.
*ducks the incoming flame-storm...*
Porsche 911, Carrera, Boxster, Turbo: manual only
Ferrari (Any model): manual only
Ferrari (Any model): manual only
Are you suggesting the physical impaired should be driving a muscle car... with almost 500hp?
the guy in the early 80s had a very bad crash during a Formula 1 race in England: now he is paralysed from his waist down...
Well, hee made himself the advocate of racing for physically impaired people and he still drives himself in many of those races.
I am sure a guy like this can beat me, you and 99 % of anybody else in any type of racing...
Concluding, do not judge a book by its frontpage...

************************************************** ***************
concerning the topic on which tranny, I would also like to point out that Auto with manumatic capability and smg style tranny are very much similar as for most models both the full auto and the semiauto capability are offered at the same time.
Then if a type of semiauto offers as well paddleshifters, it's just a tiny thing more (=shifting with paddle rather than touching the shift on the floor: same result).
Originally posted by 05mach1@March 31, 2005, 9:14 PM
Who's whats 6 speed man. made in Mexico not me :notnice:
Who's whats 6 speed man. made in Mexico not me :notnice:


