Installed Champion Plugs
#221
#222
I usually have this issue every time I reoil the filter
#225
You can also look into the Amsoil filter, check the link in my signature. It is a dry filter, no oil, and you can clean it with a vacuum or shop air. I have it and like it a lot. Just another option for you.
#228
Not sure if anyone has asked yet, but has anyone tried Seafoam first? That stuff worked really well for removing carbon buildup in my rangers 4.0l. When I pulled the plugs they looked like they just came out of the box.
#231
For your information guys
I just spoke with Superchips Technican, so guys which supply my tune and they suggest to re-gap the Champion spark plugs to 0,054 like Motorcraft standard gap as this is what the tune and the engine was designed for.
On lower gap they expect some problems like i.e. irregular /uneven engine work on low rev.
I think I will re-gap them to 0,054 immidiately when I got them.
What you think?
I just spoke with Superchips Technican, so guys which supply my tune and they suggest to re-gap the Champion spark plugs to 0,054 like Motorcraft standard gap as this is what the tune and the engine was designed for.
On lower gap they expect some problems like i.e. irregular /uneven engine work on low rev.
I think I will re-gap them to 0,054 immidiately when I got them.
What you think?
#233
#234
http://www.motorcraft.com/catalog.do
chose Mustang GT 4,6 chose spark plugs and you will get a spark plug with 0,054 gap
BTW AUTOLITE Part # HT1 is also 0,045
Last edited by seabiscuit; 4/14/08 at 02:58 PM.
#235
I been running the Champions for a couple weeks at the .045 gap and my take is that the car starts faster and runs as well, if not a bit better than with the stock plugs
I pulled out at 11,000. Low rev/high rev, cold engine/hot engine, these plugs are working smoothly.
Now I have no idea if this will hold up long term over 1,000's of miles, but the plugs are working satisfactorily right now.
I sure don't see any reason to change the gap, it meets the specified range in the owner's manual (which I found the stock plugs
sure don't with .054 being about what I found).
I pulled out at 11,000. Low rev/high rev, cold engine/hot engine, these plugs are working smoothly.
Now I have no idea if this will hold up long term over 1,000's of miles, but the plugs are working satisfactorily right now.
I sure don't see any reason to change the gap, it meets the specified range in the owner's manual (which I found the stock plugs
sure don't with .054 being about what I found).
For your information guys
I just spoke with Superchips Technican, so guys which supply my tune and they suggest to re-gap the Champion spark plugs to 0,054 like Motorcraft standard gap as this is what the tune and the engine was designed for.
On lower gap they expect some problems like i.e. irregular /uneven engine work on low rev.
I think I will re-gap them to 0,054 immidiately when I got them.
What you think?
I just spoke with Superchips Technican, so guys which supply my tune and they suggest to re-gap the Champion spark plugs to 0,054 like Motorcraft standard gap as this is what the tune and the engine was designed for.
On lower gap they expect some problems like i.e. irregular /uneven engine work on low rev.
I think I will re-gap them to 0,054 immidiately when I got them.
What you think?
Last edited by Kryten; 4/14/08 at 03:24 PM.
#236
I been running the Champions for a couple weeks at the .045 gap and my take is that the car starts faster and runs as well, if not a bit better than with the stock plugs
I pulled out at 11,000. Low rev/high rev, cold engine/hot engine, these plugs are working smoothly.
Now I have no idea if this will hold up long term over 1,000's of miles, but the plugs are working satisfactorily right now.
I sure don't see any reason to change the gap, it meets the specified range in the owner's manual (which I found the stock plugs
sure don't with .054 being about what I found).
I pulled out at 11,000. Low rev/high rev, cold engine/hot engine, these plugs are working smoothly.
Now I have no idea if this will hold up long term over 1,000's of miles, but the plugs are working satisfactorily right now.
I sure don't see any reason to change the gap, it meets the specified range in the owner's manual (which I found the stock plugs
sure don't with .054 being about what I found).
#237
I didn't know where to post this but I've got a set of (8) Champion #7989 Spark Plugs New in the Box for sale. $115.00 Shipped USA 48 States w/ Paypal. Email Me if Interested!!
Last edited by kov68; 4/18/08 at 11:38 PM.
#238
Here is a link to the new Ford TSB 08-7-6 (April 1, 2008) and pic of broken plugs.
http://f150online.com/forums/showthread.php?t=328090
It should how to remove the porcelain by gluing a rod in place of the electrode. This is going to increase the plug replacement bill. ...
http://f150online.com/forums/showthread.php?t=328090
It should how to remove the porcelain by gluing a rod in place of the electrode. This is going to increase the plug replacement bill. ...
Last edited by 07Foose; 4/19/08 at 09:03 AM.
#239
One probably should follow the recommended gap by Ford.
I believe the gap has a strong influence on the discharge energy produced by the coil. I believe it takes more energy to jump a bigger gap. This does not mean that more than specified gap is better, but less than may result in less spark energy.
I am glad I stumbled on this thread. Pretty incredible the design got this far considering all the prototype testing Ford must have done before putting this into production.
I wonder how much influence the gasoline we use has on this problem with the carbon buildup.
It sounds like it is prudent to follow the TSB spark plug removal procedure, no matter the miles on the engine. Who would have thought you would have to go to such extremes though for such a simple procedure?
I believe the gap has a strong influence on the discharge energy produced by the coil. I believe it takes more energy to jump a bigger gap. This does not mean that more than specified gap is better, but less than may result in less spark energy.
I am glad I stumbled on this thread. Pretty incredible the design got this far considering all the prototype testing Ford must have done before putting this into production.
I wonder how much influence the gasoline we use has on this problem with the carbon buildup.
It sounds like it is prudent to follow the TSB spark plug removal procedure, no matter the miles on the engine. Who would have thought you would have to go to such extremes though for such a simple procedure?