Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

Terminator VS GT500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/19/08, 08:16 AM
  #81  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,930
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Katshot
I drove 3 Cobras and every one was uncomfortable to me. More specifically, the relative position of the shifter, steering wheel, pedals and seat. When driving the Cobras, I had to not only put the seat all the way back but also recline it slightly to be able to get a proper distance to the pedals and steering wheel. But once in that position, I had to lean forward to shift the trans. Then on top of that, the clutch effort was ridiculously heavy.
Since I had actually driven the Cobras before any GT's, I was bummed and had all but given up on the Mustang. Then, I test drove a couple '03 GT's and found them to be far more comfortable. Specifically, the relative positions of the items mentioned above. You say they're all the same but unless all three Cobras I drove were somehow modified, I respectfully beg to differ with your statement.
wow...my experiance exactly! +2
Old 6/20/08, 07:25 AM
  #82  
Legacy TMS Member Pr
 
edumspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: PR
Posts: 5,635
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
I like em both. The Terminator has great looks, performance and IRS. The GT500 has good looks, more performance out of the box and a hydraulic clutch. I wonder if Ford has in the works an IRS for the s197. That and a diet on the GT500 would made a HUGE difference.
Old 6/20/08, 07:48 AM
  #83  
GT Member
 
Katshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not totally sure I understand why so many think IRS is so great.
Old 6/20/08, 09:01 AM
  #84  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Katshot
I'm not totally sure I understand why so many think IRS is so great.
Ever taken turns like say like a long curved on ramp and hit bumpers or holes int he road and felt the whoe rear end jump and shimmy over? Or going straight and hit a pothole on one side yet the whole rearend feels the effects? Thats what happens with a solid rear.

Soild rear works pretty darn well on say a smooth race track but in real world an IRS is superior in ride, handling, control.

There is a reason that the mustang is the only car in the world that still employs a solid rear.
Old 6/20/08, 09:40 AM
  #85  
GT Member
 
Katshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm aware of the one benefit of IRS but unless I'm crazy, there's a whole lot of posts on a whole lot of Mustang forums by Cobra owners voicing a whole lot of negative comments about their IRS. Hell, there's a ton of Cobra's that have been switched over to live-axle right? Why would they go to all that trouble, if IRS was hands-down the superior setup? And why did Ford specifically NOT use IRS on the GT500? The answer to both is that a whole lot of Mustang guys told Ford they didn't want IRS on a high-output Mustang. To be honest, every time I dump the clutch in my Mustang, I'm VERY GLAD I don't have IRS. Also, I've driven plenty of cars with live-axles that managed to handle high-speed sweepers just fine so I'm very sure it's quite possible to improve the handling characteristics of the Mustang w/o having to install IRS.

Last edited by Katshot; 6/20/08 at 09:42 AM.
Old 6/20/08, 10:36 AM
  #86  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The rambling of the sn95 IRS is rightly so. It was a far then less ideal design since they were forced to use solid axle mounting points. They did the best they could but it was no where near any other manufactures IRS.

There would not be those complaints since the new chassis is designed to use a well designed IRS.
Old 6/20/08, 10:56 AM
  #87  
GT Member
 
Katshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knight
There would not be those complaints since the new chassis is designed to use a well designed IRS.
One would hope so but to be honest, there's more than a few other examples of high-power cars with IRS, that were designed for it from the ground up, yet STILL have significant "issues" with it. Perfect example would be the Cadillac CTS-V. You could write books on the problems they've had with those cars.
While I agree in theory with your position, I still think a "pony-car" like the Mustang is probably better off with a live axle, especially since most owners are more interested in straight-line performance anyway. Plus you have to figure that a large number of owners will mod their cars (some significantly) which will throw most if not all the OEM calibrations out the window. So again, why bother?
Old 6/20/08, 11:20 AM
  #88  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
CTS V is not a good example as the car was not designed as a RWD IRS car. it was a FWD car that they redid best possible to make a RWD car out of it.

The new RWD CTS won't have problems.

There are tons of cars that do well in a straight line with IRS, Corvette, Viper, Supra.

And the amount of people that mod mustang in perspective to that amount sold is prob around 1%.
Old 6/20/08, 01:36 PM
  #89  
GT Member
 
Katshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knight
CTS V is not a good example as the car was not designed as a RWD IRS car. it was a FWD car that they redid best possible to make a RWD car out of it.

The new RWD CTS won't have problems.

There are tons of cars that do well in a straight line with IRS, Corvette, Viper, Supra.

And the amount of people that mod mustang in perspective to that amount sold is prob around 1%.
The CTS was in fact, designed from the start as a RWD. It utilized the RWD Sigma platform right from the start.
If not that car, how about the GTO? Same issues, and as far as I recall, it was designed as a RWD as well.
And I have to say I doubt your 1% figure on how many Mustangs get modded.
Also, think about the cars you're using as examples, these cars are not in the same league as a Mustang.

Last edited by Katshot; 6/20/08 at 01:38 PM.
Old 6/22/08, 06:55 PM
  #90  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Terminator guys replaced the IRS for drag racing purposes which suits a live axle better. The GTO's IRS has no major issues I am aware of unless some serious mods are involved and drag racing use. Even then a set of drag bags and DR's and 1.5 60's are possible on stock GTO IRS's. They are generally stouter than the Fbodies live axle setup. Pull a 1.5 with an Fbody on DR's and you will say bye bye to the rear (even though the Fbody 10 bolt is a joke).
Old 6/22/08, 08:19 PM
  #91  
Bullitt Member
 
bored out's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2007
Location: Robins AFB
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 for the Terminator

What a great name, much better than the condor, how cheesey is that?
Old 6/23/08, 07:54 PM
  #92  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts




Any questions?
Old 6/24/08, 08:03 AM
  #93  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
LOL at 9 integras vs 3 cobras.
Old 6/24/08, 09:53 AM
  #94  
GT Member
 
Katshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2007
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also equals just TWO of these:
Attached Thumbnails Terminator VS GT500-08_ext_viper_phtgal_04.jpg   Terminator VS GT500-2008-ford-f-450-super-duty-front-view.jpg  
Old 6/24/08, 11:37 PM
  #95  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Knight
And the amount of people that mod mustang in perspective to that amount sold is prob around 1%.
I suspect its much higher than that, that would only be 1,000 people out of every 100,000 - The S197 has certainly eclipsed the 1/2 million mark by now so that would mean that about 5,000 people have modified thier Mustangs - slim pickings for the aftermarket to even consider messing with.

I also suspect the number is probably near or at a double digit in regards to people modifying the car.
Old 6/25/08, 05:44 AM
  #96  
Legacy TMS Member Pr
 
edumspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: PR
Posts: 5,635
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
I suspect its much higher than that, that would only be 1,000 people out of every 100,000 - The S197 has certainly eclipsed the 1/2 million mark by now so that would mean that about 5,000 people have modified thier Mustangs - slim pickings for the aftermarket to even consider messing with.

I also suspect the number is probably near or at a double digit in regards to people modifying the car.
I agree. Many of the Mustangs around here have some sort of modification on them, specially the older ones, since they become more affordable to many enthusiast. The mayor part of the new ones are stock, but 3 out of 10 i've seen have at least Shelby or other stripe and/or performance exhaust.
Mustang=fun
Mustang+mods=double fun
Old 9/12/08, 02:33 AM
  #97  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/H...SVT_163963.htm

Just addin a lil fuel to the fire. Great vid though!

Here's another just for fun. '08 GT500 vs 66 Restomod:

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/H...-66_172235.htm

Last edited by stangfoeva; 9/12/08 at 02:37 AM.
Old 9/20/08, 06:38 PM
  #98  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/H...SVT_163963.htm

Just addin a lil fuel to the fire. Great vid though!

Here's another just for fun. '08 GT500 vs 66 Restomod:

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/H...-66_172235.htm
Heh, so much for an objective score.
Old 9/20/08, 06:59 PM
  #99  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
Heh, so much for an objective score.
I know huh? I looked at some of their other head to head comparisons, and it doesn't matter which car performs better, its what THEY like better. It's retarded, but I just like watching the cars.
Old 9/21/08, 12:24 AM
  #100  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
JedCranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 22, 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by USMC0341
Very true statement, The car had the most heaviest clutch I have ever experienced in any car or truck! After just a few minutes in Socal traffic I wanted to pull over and shoot the **** thing

But I was and still am in love with the looks and the power, the blower whine I sold my first cobra due to the clutch, then I missed the power bought another one..then I remembered why I sold the first one

With this said, I will own another one in the future

the first one...a 2003


the second one...a 2004
I wonder how that Cobra would do against a Z06. I think George is over a pony for the bowtie Me 2

Jed


Quick Reply: Terminator VS GT500



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 PM.