5.0 vs ls1
12/29/12, 11:03 AM
#21
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NC07GTCS
Thanks! I believe you are right about the 275 HP in 1994.
Everyone feels different about the type of transmission. I like having the best of both worlds. My GT/CS is a 5 speed and my T/A is an auto. When I go to Atlanta with it's constant traffic jams I like taking the T/A, or my left leg would look like the Hulk if I took the Mustang.
With new automatics it is now a moot point as far as performance is concerned, not like in the 90s.
Last edited by 97GT03SVT; 12/29/12 at 11:04 AM.
12/29/12, 06:05 PM
#22
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: September 16, 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After a couple days with my 5.0 I have to say I can't see a ls1 touching this thing. My cousins ss +bolt ons feels strong but just not the same. Fastest thing i drove besides my friend's explorer 4.6 + vortech in a 98 body.
1/1/13, 02:34 AM
#23
Cobra Member
I've had both. An 01 SS was my ls1 car. Car went 11.80s @ 120 mph with a simple 125 Nos dry kit and drag radials and 13.50@ 106 showroom stock. The cars were very strong and the best bang for your buck for over a decade. It took Ford 13 years to catch them in the base pony cars. But no, a stock LS1 will not beat a stock 5.0 nor should it. We had a decade to catch them. Just like a 2011-13 mustang is not going to beat the 2025 Camaro.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post