5/26/04 FOXBORO, MA Pics
Believe me sharp...if anyone treated you a bit rudely, well, I'm guessing that a tiny part of it is that a lot of us are pretty bummed that we can't get stripes from the factory. I was hoping for white stripes down the center of my torch red gt.
But c'est la vie. or que sera sera. Spreichen si deutsch? Aloha?
Sorry you got chewed.
But c'est la vie. or que sera sera. Spreichen si deutsch? Aloha?
Sorry you got chewed.
I think the stripes will end up on the car, because I feel there must be some options coming down the road to justify having the two trim models. The GT can be had in all the same ways with either trim package, which leads me to think that there are more things to come which will be exclusive to the "premier" level of car. These things could be the 18s, the stripes, suspension upgrade package, etc...
Also, I just thought of this, someone else mentioned that, what if Ford made the SE that is debuting in "march," actually an anniversary model or something... This is a total possibility. No one ever said the SE would be a model from ford's past. The Bullitt wasn't. The anniversaries weren't. The only one that was, was the Mach 1.
Also, just thought about this too. The Ford rep said he didnt know what the model was that they were working on... There is no way he didnt know. He would definately know the difference between an anniversary model, a mach, a boss, etc. They all have such telltale signs of their identity. This leads me to think the SE will be an appearance package, anniversary package or something along those lines... If he was unclear to what he was making, we can rule out that it had a shaker, since this would make it a mach, it wouldn't have a lot of the extra ammenities since this would make it a boss (as the boss was a light-weight racer), etc....
I'm expecting a "Shelby" model at most, which I think is still a bit of a stretch going by the given info. Granted, he could have been lying to hide his knowledge, but I don't think he would have phrased it like he did. He wouldn't have said that it was up to marketing. This would make this guy the most ignorant Mustang designer in history if he didnt know that such things as the shaker or otherwise denote special models....
Lemmeknowatchatink.
Also, I just thought of this, someone else mentioned that, what if Ford made the SE that is debuting in "march," actually an anniversary model or something... This is a total possibility. No one ever said the SE would be a model from ford's past. The Bullitt wasn't. The anniversaries weren't. The only one that was, was the Mach 1.
Also, just thought about this too. The Ford rep said he didnt know what the model was that they were working on... There is no way he didnt know. He would definately know the difference between an anniversary model, a mach, a boss, etc. They all have such telltale signs of their identity. This leads me to think the SE will be an appearance package, anniversary package or something along those lines... If he was unclear to what he was making, we can rule out that it had a shaker, since this would make it a mach, it wouldn't have a lot of the extra ammenities since this would make it a boss (as the boss was a light-weight racer), etc....
I'm expecting a "Shelby" model at most, which I think is still a bit of a stretch going by the given info. Granted, he could have been lying to hide his knowledge, but I don't think he would have phrased it like he did. He wouldn't have said that it was up to marketing. This would make this guy the most ignorant Mustang designer in history if he didnt know that such things as the shaker or otherwise denote special models....
Lemmeknowatchatink.
Originally posted by dustindu4+May. 30th, 2004, 2:58 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dustindu4 @ May. 30th, 2004, 2:58 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Dan@May. 30th, 2004, 12:59 AM
Dunstin, are you 351CJ (from stangnet)?
Dunstin, are you 351CJ (from stangnet)?
V10, are YOU 351CJ then?
351CJ on stangnet recounted the EXACT same story so I figured it was one of you two.
Originally posted by Dan@May. 30th, 2004, 9:53 AM
V10, are YOU 351CJ then?
351CJ on stangnet recounted the EXACT same story so I figured it was one of you two.
V10, are YOU 351CJ then?
351CJ on stangnet recounted the EXACT same story so I figured it was one of you two.
I swore I would not get involved in another internet Forum, but I followed a link to TheMustangSource. Then I started reading the forums and couldn't stop myself from throwing my 2 cents into a V8 vs. V10 arguement that was going on here. V10 seemed like the perfect handle.
After I found TMS, I lost interest in StangNet because it seems that half the people on StangNet either want to start a fight or start a thread saying how the '05 Stang sucks. But I kept getting sucked into the arguments trying to correct all the mis-information over there.
I posted my "interview" on The Mustang Source, because I knew that if I put it up on StangNet all I would get was 30 replies calling it BS. After seeing the 05 and talking the Ford engineer, I couldn't stop myself from going back to StangNet to once again try to set some of those StangNetters straight. Besides StangNet had become boring since Ron Jeremy dissappeared.
Fourth of July resolution, don't get involved win anymore StangNet arguements. :bang:
Originally posted by dustindu4@May. 29th, 2004, 5:56 AM
All I could think about how crappy the video was of the test mule revving and I wanted something better with the microphone on the exhaust pipe.
All I could think about how crappy the video was of the test mule revving and I wanted something better with the microphone on the exhaust pipe.
Originally posted by CA Stang+May. 30th, 2004, 11:46 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (CA Stang @ May. 30th, 2004, 11:46 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dustindu4@May. 29th, 2004, 5:56 AM
All I could think about how crappy the video was of the test mule revving and I wanted something better with the microphone on the exhaust pipe.
All I could think about how crappy the video was of the test mule revving and I wanted something better with the microphone on the exhaust pipe.
there was a guy in that video who got sound from the tips. Wish I could hear what he got.
Considering the GTR's Debut in New York, and it's Obvious Boss Inspired Styling Cues, I'm Seriously Expecting a Boss to be the New SE. Besides I heard Rumors When they released the Mach 1 (Granted Rumors Spread Like Wildfire) That the Next SE after the Mach 1, was going to be a Boss.
Originally posted by TampaBear67@May. 30th, 2004, 1:50 PM
Considering the GTR's Debut in New York, and it's Obvious Boss Inspired Styling Cues, I'm Seriously Expecting a Boss to be the New SE. Besides I heard Rumors When they released the Mach 1 (Granted Rumors Spread Like Wildfire) That the Next SE after the Mach 1, was going to be a Boss.
Considering the GTR's Debut in New York, and it's Obvious Boss Inspired Styling Cues, I'm Seriously Expecting a Boss to be the New SE. Besides I heard Rumors When they released the Mach 1 (Granted Rumors Spread Like Wildfire) That the Next SE after the Mach 1, was going to be a Boss.
I was wondering, both Dustin and V10 said the shift linkage was rubbery and didn't feel right. Do you think this will change before production?? The 1st mod most guys make is getting a Steeda tri-ax shifter. Do you think this car will need it?? And will the warranty still be in force if you put one in?? One Ford dealer said yes and another said NO it would void the warranty. What do you guys think??
This is the answer V10 got from the Ford manager when he asked that question.
That shift lever feels like rubber. Is that the final choice? (manual trannie)
WM - Oh no, this is an early car. We've been working on the shifting, I think we've gone through 5 iterations since this car was built.
WM - Oh no, this is an early car. We've been working on the shifting, I think we've gone through 5 iterations since this car was built.
Originally posted by sajawebb@May. 30th, 2004, 12:54 AM
Hey Boomer...I think you're the one that convinced me to go with that mod (over on stangnet) back in April?!?
Hey Boomer...I think you're the one that convinced me to go with that mod (over on stangnet) back in April?!?
Originally posted by V10+May. 30th, 2004, 12:44 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (V10 @ May. 30th, 2004, 12:44 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Dan@May. 30th, 2004, 9:53 AM
V10, are YOU 351CJ then?
351CJ on stangnet recounted the EXACT same story so I figured it was one of you two.
V10, are YOU 351CJ then?
351CJ on stangnet recounted the EXACT same story so I figured it was one of you two.
I swore I would not get involved in another internet Forum, but I followed a link to TheMustangSource. Then I started reading the forums and couldn't stop myself from throwing my 2 cents into a V8 vs. V10 arguement that was going on here. V10 seemed like the perfect handle.
After I found TMS, I lost interest in StangNet because it seems that half the people on StangNet either want to start a fight or start a thread saying how the '05 Stang sucks. But I kept getting sucked into the arguments trying to correct all the mis-information over there.
I posted my "interview" on The Mustang Source, because I knew that if I put it up on StangNet all I would get was 30 replies calling it BS. After seeing the 05 and talking the Ford engineer, I couldn't stop myself from going back to StangNet to once again try to set some of those StangNetters straight. Besides StangNet had become boring since Ron Jeremy dissappeared.
Fourth of July resolution, don't get involved win anymore StangNet arguements. :bang: [/b][/quote]
I remember you very well from your many posts on various messageboards. I believe you posted on BON also no?
Did you use the 351CJ handle before themustangsource.com crashed?
The user ID seems VERY familiar to me.
Originally posted by Dan@May. 30th, 2004, 9:13 PM
Did you use the 351CJ handle before themustangsource.com crashed?
The user ID seems VERY familiar to me.
Did you use the 351CJ handle before themustangsource.com crashed?
The user ID seems VERY familiar to me.
I just picked the V10 handle because my first post was when I jumped in the middle of a V8 vs V10 arguement.
Also the 351CJ is sort of obsolete since I sold my last "classic" Ford that had a 351 Cleveland in it (the somewhat unknown 351 Cobra Jet engine). I actually had several cars with 351 Clevelands in them over the years to that's where the 351CJ handle came from.
Originally posted by f1-cobra@May. 30th, 2004, 5:57 PM
This is the answer V10 got from the Ford manager when he asked that question.
This is the answer V10 got from the Ford manager when he asked that question.
That shift lever feels like rubber. Is that the final choice? (manual trannie)
WM - Oh no, this is an early car. We've been working on the shifting, I think we've gone through 5 iterations since this car was built.
WM - Oh no, this is an early car. We've been working on the shifting, I think we've gone through 5 iterations since this car was built.



