5/26/04 FOXBORO, MA Pics
Originally posted by FamilyFun@May. 27th, 2004, 7:50 AM
- The car is well proportioned. To me, the 04 gives the impression that the body and frame are mismatched in size. The 05 is a clean design, just like the 65 Mustang, 63 Vette, and other vehicles that have a complete and balanced design. It is a full size larger than the 65 Stang.
- The car is well proportioned. To me, the 04 gives the impression that the body and frame are mismatched in size. The 05 is a clean design, just like the 65 Mustang, 63 Vette, and other vehicles that have a complete and balanced design. It is a full size larger than the 65 Stang.
The 99-04 looks like a hobby horse go cart compared to the 05.
What was even funnier was that when I was there there was a Mustang II (Cobra II model) parked right next to the 05. You can see it in Dustin's photos.
Those hosers who posted that the '05 looks like the Stang II need to check themselves into a mental institution. (or at least see an optometrist).
Originally posted by burningman@May. 27th, 2004, 9:10 AM
Thanx V10. Come on down to florida..no front plate here
Thanx V10. Come on down to florida..no front plate here
dustin-
darn, 6'4" and 280 w/32" inseam and it looks like you JUST fit comfortably. I'm concerned on that as, I'm 6'5", 240 w/34-36" inseam, and it appears your knees are very close to rubbing on the console/door.
Is it as cramped as you look in the pics? What about the headroom? In the pic w/you in the seat, it appears you're almost topping out there against the liner?
darn, 6'4" and 280 w/32" inseam and it looks like you JUST fit comfortably. I'm concerned on that as, I'm 6'5", 240 w/34-36" inseam, and it appears your knees are very close to rubbing on the console/door.
Is it as cramped as you look in the pics? What about the headroom? In the pic w/you in the seat, it appears you're almost topping out there against the liner?
Originally posted by V10+May. 27th, 2004, 11:14 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (V10 @ May. 27th, 2004, 11:14 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-burningman@May. 27th, 2004, 9:10 AM
Thanx V10. Come on down to florida..no front plate here
Thanx V10. Come on down to florida..no front plate here
I'm guessing you are from CT or MA. You do know that even though you don't pay those taxes, the average wage is much much lower down there, so you really aren't going to save much money by not paying the taxes.
WOW!
This came outta left field! Nice Work Dustin!
If what they're saying about the increase in size and dimensions is true, Us Big Guys (I'm 6'4" 385 lb with a 34" Inseam) Won't have a problem in an 05!
I drove my Roomates, Sisters 01 V6, 5 speed Stang the other night,(Not Enough Power for me that's for sure!) but, besides the feeling that the drivers door was a bit close to my shoulder, I was comfortable in it, so If the 05 has more leg, shoulder, and head room then It will Be Perfect!
I'm imagining it to be close to my Old 87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, in Interior Room, and it sounds Much better than my Old 92 Lincoln Mark VII LSC, or my friends 91 LX 5.0 (Man those Fox Stangs feel really cramped inside to me now. Of course I'm a bit bigger too, than when they were new.)
One question Dustin, You said "It is a Full Size Larger than a 65", how does it compare to a 69/70?
This came outta left field! Nice Work Dustin! I drove my Roomates, Sisters 01 V6, 5 speed Stang the other night,(Not Enough Power for me that's for sure!) but, besides the feeling that the drivers door was a bit close to my shoulder, I was comfortable in it, so If the 05 has more leg, shoulder, and head room then It will Be Perfect!
I'm imagining it to be close to my Old 87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe, in Interior Room, and it sounds Much better than my Old 92 Lincoln Mark VII LSC, or my friends 91 LX 5.0 (Man those Fox Stangs feel really cramped inside to me now. Of course I'm a bit bigger too, than when they were new.)
One question Dustin, You said "It is a Full Size Larger than a 65", how does it compare to a 69/70?
Originally posted by Grantsdale+May. 27th, 2004, 9:34 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Grantsdale @ May. 27th, 2004, 9:34 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
I'm working on moving out of here right now. Northern FL is on my possible list. If I didn't have to pay the property taxes and state income tax that we have up here I could afford an '05 Stang right now.
Originally posted by V10@May. 27th, 2004, 11:14 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-burningman
<!--QuoteBegin-burningman
@May. 27th, 2004, 9:10 AM
Thanx V10. Come on down to florida..no front plate here
Thanx V10. Come on down to florida..no front plate here
I'm working on moving out of here right now. Northern FL is on my possible list. If I didn't have to pay the property taxes and state income tax that we have up here I could afford an '05 Stang right now.
It really depends on what part of Florida, even what part of Northern Florida. Jacksonville has a higher cost of living than my end, Pensacola, and the wages are a good bit higher on average there. But, even though the average pay here in P'cola is lower, housing is rediculously cheap. I can get a fully furnished two-bedroom apartment for $550/month, rent a 3-bed 2 story house for $800/month, or you can buy a nice sized place ~15 years old for probably $80k average. I think it's a good trade-off, and the area is beautiful.
Dustin, great work on all of this! Unfortunately it'll be a few years until I'm out of college (finally) and making real money so I can't look at buying one, but you did a great service to the people here who are. Kudos.
Originally posted by TampaBear67@May. 27th, 2004, 12:22 PM
If what they're saying about the increase in size and dimensions is true, Us Big Guys (I'm 6'4" 385 lb with a 34" Inseam) Won't have a problem in an 05!
I drove my Roomates, Sisters 01 V6, 5 speed Stang the other night,(Not Enough Power for me that's for sure!) but, besides the feeling that the drivers door was a bit close to my shoulder, I was comfortable in it, so If the 05 has more leg, shoulder, and head room then It will Be Perfect!
If what they're saying about the increase in size and dimensions is true, Us Big Guys (I'm 6'4" 385 lb with a 34" Inseam) Won't have a problem in an 05!
I drove my Roomates, Sisters 01 V6, 5 speed Stang the other night,(Not Enough Power for me that's for sure!) but, besides the feeling that the drivers door was a bit close to my shoulder, I was comfortable in it, so If the 05 has more leg, shoulder, and head room then It will Be Perfect!
Front Head Room: 38.3 in. Front Hip Room: 55.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 58.5 in. Rear Head Room: 36.5 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 57.9 in. Rear Hip Room: 57 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 35.9 in.
Luggage Capacity: 16 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 5
2005 mustang: (from the order guide)
Head Room (inches)
1st Row 38.6
2nd Row 35.0
Shoulder Room (inches
1st Row 55.4
2nd Row 53.3
Leg Room Maximum Extension (inches)
1st Row 42.7
2nd Row 31.0
EPA Interior Volume Index
(cu. ft.) 96.0
Luggage Capacity
Trunk (cu. ft) 12.3
_____________________________________
as you can see, the new mustang's front passenger dimensions are very similar to the old style grand prix (like the one in my signature)
in fact, the interior room is one of the main reasons i have a GP and not a mustang...my 6'4" self didn't fit well in the sn95

in other words, the 2005 should be as comfortable as a grand prix...which is GREAT news for us giants
Originally posted by burningman@May. 27th, 2004, 8:20 AM
Dustin...can you clarify something for me. Are the holes for the front plates actual holes or are they just like little dimples?
Dustin...can you clarify something for me. Are the holes for the front plates actual holes or are they just like little dimples?
Originally posted by bar@May. 27th, 2004, 9:18 AM
dustin-
darn, 6'4" and 280 w/32" inseam and it looks like you JUST fit comfortably. I'm concerned on that as, I'm 6'5", 240 w/34-36" inseam, and it appears your knees are very close to rubbing on the console/door.
Is it as cramped as you look in the pics? What about the headroom? In the pic w/you in the seat, it appears you're almost topping out there against the liner?
dustin-
darn, 6'4" and 280 w/32" inseam and it looks like you JUST fit comfortably. I'm concerned on that as, I'm 6'5", 240 w/34-36" inseam, and it appears your knees are very close to rubbing on the console/door.
Is it as cramped as you look in the pics? What about the headroom? In the pic w/you in the seat, it appears you're almost topping out there against the liner?
Head room was ample if you moved the seat all the way down
Originally posted by TampaBear67@May. 27th, 2004, 10:22 AM
One question Dustin, You said "It is a Full Size Larger than a 65", how does it compare to a 69/70?[/color]
One question Dustin, You said "It is a Full Size Larger than a 65", how does it compare to a 69/70?[/color]
Originally posted by burningman@May. 27th, 2004, 10:50 AM
hold on your are saying holes and v10 says dimples....which is it?
and why would they pre drill holes in the bumper?
hold on your are saying holes and v10 says dimples....which is it?
and why would they pre drill holes in the bumper?
There were definately holes in that bumper.
Yeah, I think they'll be dimples.
They wouldn't have a predrilled bumper unless EVERYONE needed it (Which they don't)
I'm eager to see 'bracket' (probably will look better than flat out drilling the plate in)
The hood blanket on the current stang has a running pony in it (1) but its cool
Can't wait to see the new one.
They wouldn't have a predrilled bumper unless EVERYONE needed it (Which they don't)
I'm eager to see 'bracket' (probably will look better than flat out drilling the plate in)
The hood blanket on the current stang has a running pony in it (1) but its cool

Can't wait to see the new one.
Originally posted by BenJammin@May. 27th, 2004, 10:38 AM
_____________________________________
as you can see, the new mustang's front passenger dimensions are very similar to the old style grand prix (like the one in my signature)
in fact, the interior room is one of the main reasons i have a GP and not a mustang...my 6'4" self didn't fit well in the sn95
in other words, the 2005 should be as comfortable as a grand prix...which is GREAT news for us giants
_____________________________________
as you can see, the new mustang's front passenger dimensions are very similar to the old style grand prix (like the one in my signature)
in fact, the interior room is one of the main reasons i have a GP and not a mustang...my 6'4" self didn't fit well in the sn95

in other words, the 2005 should be as comfortable as a grand prix...which is GREAT news for us giants
I still might have to duck to see traffic lights change, but I've gotten used to that...



