2015 Photoshop/Rendering Thread
#741
Cobra R Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Yep, they are official renderings of the 2010 GT500. The image below was an official rendering of the 2005 GT, my point being that this car actually looks more like the 2010 GT. So, following that theory, there's a small chance that the next gen car may look similar to the 2010 rendering (hope you catch my drift
)
![](http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n294/TwinTurbo300/Mustang%202010/2010Tampa2.jpg?t=1254517075)
![Smile](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![](http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n294/TwinTurbo300/Mustang%202010/2010Tampa2.jpg?t=1254517075)
![Big Grin](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#743
Cobra R Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
No Problem, LOL Honestly I had to look to see if it was mine or not, it seems like so long ago that I posted it. I'm just glad to see it's still floating around 3 years later. Here's a Quick Sketch I did for the 2014 when the 2010's came out.
![](https://themustangsource.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=86644&stc=1&d=1303324272)
Last edited by TampaBear67; 4/20/11 at 12:31 PM. Reason: Added Pic
#746
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Why are they saving the rear diffuser for the SE ponies? They have to get rid of the lumpy black plastic that's on the '10+...
I'm noticing a bit of DBx influence there.
I'm noticing a bit of DBx influence there.
#748
Very interesting! I see a Mustang with some Kinetic design themes like the new Focus (large openings on lower corners of the front bumper). Let the Camaro comparisons begin.
#750
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#751
MOTM Committee Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
#752
The classic scoop is joke. It never did anything even the original Shelbys didn't need a duct to the rear brakes. The rear facing scoop is node to mid engined cars Mustangs aren't mid or rear engined if you haven't noticed. On the other hand they have had huge problems getting the air out from under the hood and the ducts on the front fenders draw hot air out from under the engine compartment.
#753
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The classic scoop is joke. It never did anything even the original Shelbys didn't need a duct to the rear brakes. The rear facing scoop is node to mid engined cars Mustangs aren't mid or rear engined if you haven't noticed. On the other hand they have had huge problems getting the air out from under the hood and the ducts on the front fenders draw hot air out from under the engine compartment.
#754
Cobra Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Out of the many magazine articles I've read and the thousand of posts I've read on this forum, that's the first time I've ever read that the Mustang has "huge problems" or any problems with shedding hot air from under the hood. I agree that we don't need big jutting fake scoops ahead of the rear wheels, but having creases in the sheet metal that hint at it are part of the Mustang legacy. That running pony emblem doesn't provide any functionality either but most of us would darn well miss it if it were gone.
#755
MOTM Committee Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
The classic scoop is joke. It never did anything even the original Shelbys didn't need a duct to the rear brakes. The rear facing scoop is node to mid engined cars Mustangs aren't mid or rear engined if you haven't noticed. On the other hand they have had huge problems getting the air out from under the hood and the ducts on the front fenders draw hot air out from under the engine compartment.
#757
Yea I prefer the classic scoop regardless of functionality. It's classic mustang. I really don't like to see an 99-04 mustang without the side or hoodscoops. Looks to bland to me. But now if they went and put brake cooling ducts or just made them for some areo improvement then +1. Something the size of the SN95 or rad but smaller with 450HP handling like a Boss and the interior quality of a 2010+ and it'll be sweet.
#758
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
If you're looking for a Cormarostang, sure... Otherwise... it's great graphics work, nothing more, nothing less. I see Corvette behind-the-wheel-well-scoops along with a Camaro window/roofline, and a possibility of a Mustang front end. Nothing solid. And nothing that speaks the Mustang design language exclusively or fluently. A cool design, yes. A Mustang design, no.