*Updated* Arin's Uber "76" Mustang II Buildup
10/4/08, 09:23 PM
#1545
Post *****
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
almost on topic
i let the II run for a bit today. she needs to be retuned after that **** carb scoop linkage, but man i forgot how good she sounds...
i let the II run for a bit today. she needs to be retuned after that **** carb scoop linkage, but man i forgot how good she sounds...
10/5/08, 10:16 PM
#1556
Post *****
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
I spent $220 today and lookie what I got
if its painted blue, i got it in a $20 package deal from Peter. he had the TB. IAC and MAF sitting in his garage, BUT its for a fox, not the intake I have, which is for a SN95. someone had disassembled a 5.0 engine for us already and all this stuff was just sitting there. talk about easy pickins
the computer is not the A9L, which is supposed to be the favored one. I checked both mustang GTs and the computers and top ends were gone. Its an EEC-IV from an lincoln Mark VII LSC
anyhow, pics
if its painted blue, i got it in a $20 package deal from Peter. he had the TB. IAC and MAF sitting in his garage, BUT its for a fox, not the intake I have, which is for a SN95. someone had disassembled a 5.0 engine for us already and all this stuff was just sitting there. talk about easy pickins
the computer is not the A9L, which is supposed to be the favored one. I checked both mustang GTs and the computers and top ends were gone. Its an EEC-IV from an lincoln Mark VII LSC
anyhow, pics
10/5/08, 10:56 PM
#1557
NTTAWWT
It's a step in the right direction, I'd just be worried about compatability, and getting someone to make a tune for that setup