Rumoured power outputs for '15
#441
I'd rather see additional TQ available down low to get moving quicker.
#442
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the rough character of the VQ motor, that is to a degree inherent in any V6, even a 60-degree one. They simply don't have perfect primary balance and over much more than 3 liters, that really starts to show, especially in any motor that aspires to rev much. In contrast, say, are straight sixes, that do have essentially perfect balance and thus, are creamy smooth regardless of revs. I can well attest to that having an E46 M3 that spins up to 8K rpm with silken smoothness.
The Stang's 3.7 is pretty darned good in terms of power, torque and NVH, but neither is it immune from the limitations of its configuration and size.
#443
Legacy TMS Member
The closer measure of the actual energy a motor is putting out is the HP. I could create X amount of torque given enough lever, and enough time. However, power and acceleration are time dependent variables, thus, a higher power rating will ultimately trump a torque rating given any measure that involves time such as acceleration rate. Good juicy torque numbers can, on their own, give nice seat of the pants feel, but to churn out actual acceleration numbers, you need actual power, i.e. hp.
#444
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The closer measure of the actual energy a motor is putting out is the HP. I could create X amount of torque given enough lever, and enough time. However, power and acceleration are time dependent variables, thus, a higher power rating will ultimately trump a torque rating given any measure that involves time such as acceleration rate. Good juicy torque numbers can, on their own, give nice seat of the pants feel, but to churn out actual acceleration numbers, you need actual power, i.e. hp.
As for the rough character of the VQ motor, that is to a degree inherent in any V6, even a 60-degree one. They simply don't have perfect primary balance and over much more than 3 liters, that really starts to show, especially in any motor that aspires to rev much. In contrast, say, are straight sixes, that do have essentially perfect balance and thus, are creamy smooth regardless of revs. I can well attest to that having an E46 M3 that spins up to 8K rpm with silken smoothness.
The Stang's 3.7 is pretty darned good in terms of power, torque and NVH, but neither is it immune from the limitations of its configuration and size.
As for the rough character of the VQ motor, that is to a degree inherent in any V6, even a 60-degree one. They simply don't have perfect primary balance and over much more than 3 liters, that really starts to show, especially in any motor that aspires to rev much. In contrast, say, are straight sixes, that do have essentially perfect balance and thus, are creamy smooth regardless of revs. I can well attest to that having an E46 M3 that spins up to 8K rpm with silken smoothness.
The Stang's 3.7 is pretty darned good in terms of power, torque and NVH, but neither is it immune from the limitations of its configuration and size.
#445
Legacy TMS Member
The problem is people tend to separate the two values into different forces when there is only one that is a force (torque) and the other (horsepower) describes how much work you can accomplish with that force.
#446
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did anyone else see the official presser for the new Lincoln MKC escape clone... 2.3 ecoboost 275hp and 300lbft, in mustang tune we could easily see 300hp+
Last edited by xlover; 11/13/13 at 07:57 AM.
#448
Legacy TMS Member
I think the bigger draw with Ecoboost is that it resonates with techies and as an affordable power adder car.
On an unrelated note, I read a press release from Comp Cams, they have already released cams for GM's DI fueled LT motor, I'm not sure how Ford implements their high pressure side pump but if its similar to GM then a separate lobe on a camshaft drives the pump and can increase flow by as much as 75% (IIRC) by altering the shape of the fuel pump cam.
Perhaps with the Ecoboost Mustang we will see something similar for high horsepower applications since swapping injectors on a DI engine isn't exactly an easy chore.
#449
Legacy TMS Member
I read that the 2.3 EcoBoost will be tuned for about 310 HP and be an option over the 3.7 V6
#450
Cobra Member
Yea, I could see Ford offer the 2.3 Ecoboost with 310 - 330 horsepower. People will still buy lots of 300 horsepower V6 Mustangs because they will be less expensive than the special Ecoboost powered Mustang.
#451
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah in real life I doubt the turbo 4 will get better MPG. there are a few DI turbo 4's already out. Haven't had a chance to check. But my sisters Mazdaspeed 3 got around the same mileage of my 2012 GT. she got 2-3 more on the highway bc she stayed out of boost cruising.
And if they are both making similar power gonna be hard for Ford to charge more for an ecoBoost engine that gets the same gas mileage and similar performance.
And if they are both making similar power gonna be hard for Ford to charge more for an ecoBoost engine that gets the same gas mileage and similar performance.
#452
Legacy TMS Member
Yeah in real life I doubt the turbo 4 will get better MPG. there are a few DI turbo 4's already out. Haven't had a chance to check. But my sisters Mazdaspeed 3 got around the same mileage of my 2012 GT. she got 2-3 more on the highway bc she stayed out of boost cruising.
And if they are both making similar power gonna be hard for Ford to charge more for an ecoBoost engine that gets the same gas mileage and similar performance.
And if they are both making similar power gonna be hard for Ford to charge more for an ecoBoost engine that gets the same gas mileage and similar performance.
Charging more for the 365hp/420tq V6 versus the 360hp/380tq 5.0 and advertising it as a combination of power and fuel mileage.
Yes, it gets better hwy mpg than the 5.0, but around town and towing they're about the same.
The 2.3 EcoBoost will have 5 more HP than the 3.7 V6 but a bunch more torque while getting better hwy mpg.
Therefore, a price premium.
#453
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They're doing that with the EcoBoost V6 in the F150's though Charging more for the 365hp/420tq V6 versus the 360hp/380tq 5.0 and advertising it as a combination of power and fuel mileage. Yes, it gets better hwy mpg than the 5.0, but around town and towing they're about the same. The 2.3 EcoBoost will have 5 more HP than the 3.7 V6 but a bunch more torque while getting better hwy mpg. Therefore, a price premium.
Last edited by conv_stang; 11/13/13 at 02:31 PM.
#454
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 124 Likes
on
100 Posts
With the Mustang going to be a 'World' car, i would think the EB 4 will be a good seller. I know someone in England that went from a 2.0L to a 1.5L, he said he is saving a lot of money each year on some kind of 'tax' they have to pay for engine size. Maybe Twin Turbo could give us a better idea on how much the tax is? Just saying.........
Side note: Ford is pushing the EcoBoost hard. We just bought a new Edge and the salesman was trying to push the EB 4 cylinder on us. We got the 3.5L V6.
Side note: Ford is pushing the EcoBoost hard. We just bought a new Edge and the salesman was trying to push the EB 4 cylinder on us. We got the 3.5L V6.
Last edited by David Young; 11/14/13 at 04:29 AM.
#455
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And smoother and better sounding, I'd take a V6 snarl over an I4 blat any day.
#456
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Location: Traverse City
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the Mustang going to be a 'World' car, i would think the EB 4 will be a good seller. I know someone in England that went from a 2.0L to a 1.5L, he said he is saving a lot of money each year on some kind of 'tax' they have to pay for engine size. Maybe Twin Turbo could give us a better idea on how much the tax is? Just saying.........
Side note: Ford is pushing the EcoBoost hard. We just bought a new Edge and the salesman was trying to push the EB 4 cylinder on us. We got the 3.5L V6.
Side note: Ford is pushing the EcoBoost hard. We just bought a new Edge and the salesman was trying to push the EB 4 cylinder on us. We got the 3.5L V6.
Last edited by FordBlueHeart; 11/14/13 at 06:44 PM.
#457
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Salesmen push what makes them the most money typically. When I sold cars, I pushed what I was passionate about. FYI, my wife and I just traded in our 2009 Edge with the 3.5 for a Escape 2.0 Ecoboost. We love the mileage! Power is very good in the Escape. On that note, we LOVED our Edge.
#458
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: July 24, 2008
Location: Traverse City
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are you, my wife? My wife says I'm always selling. I hate sales or at least the anxiety of it.
You can take the boy out of the car biz, but you can't take the car biz out of the boy.
Last edited by FordBlueHeart; 11/14/13 at 08:42 PM.
#459
Cobra Member
I might just buy one of those ecoboost 4 cylinder Mustangs just for kicks. I prefer V8 powered Mustangs, but an SVT Mustang with a 350 horsepower Ecoboost engine could make for a great track car. It would be something different to take out and crank out some rpms in.
#460
FR500 Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Full tourqe startin around 1500-2000 and just a stron steady pull all the way. Peak hp startin at 3k would be nice too