2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Next SVT Mustang may axe Shelby name, go naturally aspirated

Old Jun 14, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #41  
thePill's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
For sh*ts and giggles... release a drag pack GT350H. Not for Hertz, more for Hurts... That's where most original GT350H's ended up, on the strip and beat to sh*t.

Make a handful a year unless people go absolutely mad for them.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2013 | 07:26 PM
  #42  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
We'll see one model with two trims possibly. The other variants might be undertaken by Ford Racing, not SVT. Wishful thinking at best.

Last edited by Overboost; Jun 14, 2013 at 09:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2013 | 08:25 PM
  #43  
jOSEPH r. fONTENOT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 29, 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Why not a Boss 429 or a Boss 351.
Wish Ford would bring them back.
I held off in 2013 on a GT500 thinking Ford would bring one of these two units back & so far Ford did not.
So I pulled the trigger & ordered a 2014 Shelby GT500[Ruby-Red]
Waitting for my unit.
Still praying the Boss 429 or Boss 351 would come back.
Heck Ford could use the 5.8L Engine & nartural asperiate it & have the Boss351.
We can still Dream!!!!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2013 | 08:31 PM
  #44  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by Dinosoar
I agree with Knight, I don't believe the top dog Mustang can hang without forced induction of some sort. The ZL1 will break the 600HP barrier soon, I'm sure. MOPAR is working a ZL1/GT500 competitor too. Can't see the SVT version being merely 500HP. I would love a 7.0 NA engine at 500+ though!!!
Yeah but those both clear 4200 + easily... If the new mustang is coming in significantly lighter than the current car. Then you dont need 600-700 supercharged hp to make it fast. if the car comes in around 3300 and they go with an upgraded Boss engine pushing close to 500hp then it will run all over the ZL1 and I would take the SVT name over Shelby. Shelby had its run, time to move one.

Last edited by conv_stang; Jun 14, 2013 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2013 | 08:36 PM
  #45  
jOSEPH r. fONTENOT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 29, 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
I wish Ford would bring back the Boss 429 & the Boss 351.
I waited in 2013 on ordering a Shelby GT500 thinking that this would happen.
Well it did not & I orderd a 2014 Shelby GT500 & waitting for my unit.
Still praying that the Boss 429 or Boss 351 will be built.
Ford could have used the 5.8L & natural asperiate it & have the Boss 351.
Hech use the 7.0L engine & have the Boss 429.
Why not utlize this & bring back the Boss 429 & 351 & just watch the sales on these two units in the mustang line.
Come on Ford just Built them,& listen too your buyers.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2013 | 08:56 PM
  #46  
thePill's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Originally Posted by Overboost
We'ok see one model with two trims possibly. The other variants might be undertaken by Ford Racing, not SVT. Wishful thinking at best.
There are advantages to separate Ford Racing and SVT products... Each product is on a separate budget which would ensure maximum quality. SVT could either stick to the GT500 or handle the street versions of the GT350, GT500 and GT500KR (KR will share the 350's suspension so why not). While Ford Racing concentrates on the R's (GT-R, GT350R) and Super Snake (based loosely on the turn key to replace the Cobra Jet).


All kinds of fun possibilities and sharing these small projects between internal divisions will utilize different budgets... Maybe this is why the Boss 302 was so good...

As for the Boss 429 and 351. I think all those Mach 1, Bullitt, Boss linage and Cobra Jet's need to reserve themselves for special occasions. The 429 and 351 are going to be harder to do as long as displacement remains dictated. The Mach 1 has special edition written all over it... Lets give it a try on an anniversary year. But look at the possible lineup that can be sprung from the GT, GT350, GT500 naming scheme. You have the R's, KR and Super Snake. With all those possibilities and just pure marketing streamlining, the product looks great and very marketable. It is consistent just as any other world class sports coupe/car. And lot's of flexibility and heritage comes from each of those names as additional packages. Lets face it, to have the ultimate Mustang, it might drive the cost way up... Making a base halo car with two equal options that give you one or the other is a nice strategy. Optimize the GT500 for what YOU need it for. Don't be forced to pay for extra coolers and track stuff when you drag race all the time. Why pay for any of the performance stuff when all you want is a GT500.

AND OFFER TRACK WARRANTIES!!! Make each owner/competitor feel as if Ford is in a sponsorship role of an amateur. It would feel like you had factory support for the 1st season. That would feel WONDERFUL!!

Hell, don't even call it a warranty... Option it as Competition Factory Support. 1 year/15,000 miles and maybe charge a little for it ($900-$1900). It covers drivetrain, suspension and supporting systems. No body damage, consumables or wheel/tire wear. However, a service discount for someone that has a Ford "R" account could get discounts during the season on your typical service items. Talk about stimulating a segment.

Last edited by thePill; Jun 14, 2013 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2013 | 09:22 PM
  #47  
thePill's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2011
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Long story short...

If everyone just starts agreeing on the:

GT
GT-R
GT350
GT350R
GT500
GT500KR
GT500SS

Then speculation becomes rumor, rumor becomes research, research becomes development, development becomes production...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 08:53 AM
  #48  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by thePill
Long story short...

If everyone just starts agreeing on the:

GT
GT-R
GT350
GT350R
GT500
GT500KR
GT500SS

Then speculation becomes rumor, rumor becomes research, research becomes development, development becomes production...
Too many.

Base (V6)
Base Premium (V6 or I4 turbo)
GT (5.0 V8)
GT Premium (5.0 V8)
GT350 (5.2 V8)
GT350R (5.2 V8)

The differences between the base and R models being lack of a rear seat, all coolers as standard equipment, better suspension (hopefully MR), better aero, etc.

For the other models, have an SVO package for the I4 turbo with a more aggressive gear, bigger brakes and stiffer suspension. The GT should have a track package again with the same basic upgrades as the current one.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 10:00 AM
  #49  
Twin Turbo's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 18, 2006
Posts: 5,553
Likes: 11
From: England
Thumbs up

I like the sound of that lineup, Steve, and it sounds plausible.

I'm interested to see if the I4 Turbo is the entry level but I suspect, like you pointed out there, that it will actually sit above the V6. If that's the case, I'd expect it to sport the 350bhp that has been indicated it'll have in the RS Focus. Calling it an SVO would be a nice (80's) retro touch, too........assuming it's not actually an SVT product (I'm assuming the GT350 will be the only true SVT Mustang?)

Me? I'll take a '15 GT Premium and a '16 GT350 (no R for me, I need the back seats for the kids)
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 10:48 AM
  #50  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
I like the sound of that lineup, Steve, and it sounds plausible.

I'm interested to see if the I4 Turbo is the entry level but I suspect, like you pointed out there, that it will actually sit above the V6. If that's the case, I'd expect it to sport the 350bhp that has been indicated it'll have in the RS Focus. Calling it an SVO would be a nice (80's) retro touch, too........assuming it's not actually an SVT product (I'm assuming the GT350 will be the only true SVT Mustang?)

Me? I'll take a '15 GT Premium and a '16 GT350 (no R for me, I need the back seats for the kids)
I went off the Fusion lineup as an example
They have a NA motor as the base, and the Ecoboost as the option but with similar specs.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 11:09 AM
  #51  
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2010
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: MA (north shore)
I would bet the V6 is standard, turbo 4 will be a $995 premium over the V6 but less HP and better MPG(just like it is in every other ford now). Then V8 on top.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 11:20 AM
  #52  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Overboost

Too many.

Base (V6)
Base Premium (V6 or I4 turbo)
GT (5.0 V8)
GT Premium (5.0 V8)
GT350 (5.2 V8)
GT350R (5.2 V8)

The differences between the base and R models being lack of a rear seat, all coolers as standard equipment, better suspension (hopefully MR), better aero, etc.

For the other models, have an SVO package for the I4 turbo with a more aggressive gear, bigger brakes and stiffer suspension. The GT should have a track package again with the same basic upgrades as the current one.
This.

Originally Posted by Overboost

I went off the Fusion lineup as an example
They have a NA motor as the base, and the Ecoboost as the option but with similar specs.
This.

Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
I would bet the V6 is standard, turbo 4 will be a $995 premium over the V6 but less HP and better MPG(just like it is in every other ford now). Then V8 on top.
And this. Been saying this for years now! Haha. We'll see soon enough...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 01:30 PM
  #53  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
I agree. A sub-$1000 option to move to a lighter and more fuel efficient option makes sense.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #54  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by Overboost
I agree. A sub-$1000 option to move to a lighter and more fuel efficient option makes sense.
But will a turbo 4 with intercooler and plumbing be lighter than the 3.7?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 07:21 PM
  #55  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by conv_stang

But will a turbo 4 with intercooler and plumbing be lighter than the 3.7?
More than likely. Lopping two cylinders off and going to an inline setup from a V will reduce weight. Plastic plumbing won't weigh much, and with a smaller turbo and small intercooler, you will add some weight back, but not all.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 08:08 PM
  #56  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by Overboost

More than likely. Lopping two cylinders off and going to an inline setup from a V will reduce weight. Plastic plumbing won't weigh much, and with a smaller turbo and small intercooler, you will add some weight back, but not all.
Just haven't seen any weight numbers. Would be awesome if they give the turbo 4 more power. Would love to see a light weight SVO
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 08:17 PM
  #57  
Wolfsburg's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Overboost
Too many.

Base (V6)
Base Premium (V6 or I4 turbo)
GT (5.0 V8)
GT Premium (5.0 V8)
GT350 (5.2 V8)
GT350R (5.2 V8)
I'm sure I've probably missed something, but what's the deal with this 5.2 V8?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #58  
Fords4Ever's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Wolfsburg
I'm sure I've probably missed something, but what's the deal with this 5.2 V8?
How much does the aluminum 5.8 from GT500 weigh without the supercharger? And what do you think it would develop (hp & tq) NA?
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 09:18 PM
  #59  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Fords4Ever

How much does the aluminum 5.8 from GT500 weigh without the supercharger? And what do you think it would develop (hp & tq) NA?
You're thinking the wrong direction here...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2013 | 09:18 PM
  #60  
908ssp's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
I would bet the V6 is standard, turbo 4 will be a $995 premium over the V6 but less HP and better MPG(just like it is in every other ford now). Then V8 on top.

The turbo four will make more power than the V6 along with the premium price wise. 300 for the V6, 350 for the turbo, 450 for the V8.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.