Window sticker close-up
Well, It's been fun but with the recent news of the 2010 Mustang GT staying with the 4.6L and only being 310hp, I am going to go over to GM, I just don't want to mod any more to keep up with the competition. The 2010 Camaro is better looking than the 4th Gen but not as good as the mustang, but I want more power. I just read that the SS Camaro will start at about 30K, for 422hp I am all over that.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.

Bye bye. Have fun.
The Mustang Source FOUNDER





Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 11
From: Vestavia Hills, Ala.
Haven't seen that figure released either, but a minor bump in power would not be surprising. I'd imagine they'd just roll in as standard some of the Bullitt motor features to get a nominally higher HP number they could tout in their ads ("New 2010 Mustang with even more power ... oh, a piddling 10hp...").
Undoubtedly, Ford's saving its efforts for the real power bump in 2011 when the 5.0 comes online with more like 400hp.
Undoubtedly, Ford's saving its efforts for the real power bump in 2011 when the 5.0 comes online with more like 400hp.
Last edited by rhumb; Sep 24, 2008 at 01:57 PM.
Well, It's been fun but with the recent news of the 2010 Mustang GT staying with the 4.6L and only being 310hp, I am going to go over to GM, I just don't want to mod any more to keep up with the competition. The 2010 Camaro is better looking than the 4th Gen but not as good as the mustang, but I want more power. I just read that the SS Camaro will start at about 30K, for 422hp I am all over that.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.

Well, It's been fun but with the recent news of the 2010 Mustang GT staying with the 4.6L and only being 310hp, I am going to go over to GM, I just don't want to mod any more to keep up with the competition. The 2010 Camaro is better looking than the 4th Gen but not as good as the mustang, but I want more power. I just read that the SS Camaro will start at about 30K, for 422hp I am all over that.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.

Let him go everyone. His loss of a new 2010/2011 Mustang will go to someone else who really wants one.
Well, It's been fun but with the recent news of the 2010 Mustang GT staying with the 4.6L and only being 310hp, I am going to go over to GM, I just don't want to mod any more to keep up with the competition. The 2010 Camaro is better looking than the 4th Gen but not as good as the mustang, but I want more power. I just read that the SS Camaro will start at about 30K, for 422hp I am all over that.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.
Sorry guys but it's been real but Ford once again drops the ball and lets GM pounce all over them.

Something tells me he is going to regret jumping ship before the reveal..... I don't trust that window sticker for a flat minute! I'm not saying that there's gonna be a 5.0 or not, but somehow I don't think 2010 is going to be "The Year of the Mustang" with the same ol' leftover anything from the 2009 base or GT models.
Last edited by KGray571; Sep 25, 2008 at 01:12 PM.
Actually, the base G8 V8 was under 30k, the car gets a couple thou price hike for 2009. And even with the price hike GM is no doubt losing their @@@ on every one they import. Personally, I don't doubt the Camaro SS will start below 30k (meaning 29,999) for it's first model year. But much like the G8, at that price GM will never see a dime on those cars.
I know I've been carrying this torch for a while now, and I've run into a lot of folks who prefer to ignore the mountain of evidence and argue that this isn't so clear cut in the process. But the cold hard truth is that Zeta has either A: turned out to be a massive money loser for GM or B: GM is apparently determined to go out of their way to make it look that way squandering billions in development costs and long term product plans in the process.
I'm going with option A.
I suppose what i am trying to get at here is....if GM were actually to realize a profit on the SS my bet is that the car would be closer to 40k than 30k.
I know I've been carrying this torch for a while now, and I've run into a lot of folks who prefer to ignore the mountain of evidence and argue that this isn't so clear cut in the process. But the cold hard truth is that Zeta has either A: turned out to be a massive money loser for GM or B: GM is apparently determined to go out of their way to make it look that way squandering billions in development costs and long term product plans in the process.
I'm going with option A.
I suppose what i am trying to get at here is....if GM were actually to realize a profit on the SS my bet is that the car would be closer to 40k than 30k.
Actually, the base G8 V8 was under 30k, the car gets a couple thou price hike for 2009. And even with the price hike GM is no doubt losing their @@@ on every one they import. Personally, I don't doubt the Camaro SS will start below 30k (meaning 29,999) for it's first model year. But much like the G8, at that price GM will never see a dime on those cars.
I know I've been carrying this torch for a while now, and I've run into a lot of folks who prefer to ignore the mountain of evidence and argue that this isn't so clear cut in the process. But the cold hard truth is that Zeta has either A: turned out to be a massive money loser for GM or B: GM is apparently determined to go out of their way to make it look that way squandering billions in development costs and long term product plans in the process.
I'm going with option A.
I suppose what i am trying to get at here is....if GM were actually to realize a profit on the SS my bet is that the car would be closer to 40k than 30k.
I know I've been carrying this torch for a while now, and I've run into a lot of folks who prefer to ignore the mountain of evidence and argue that this isn't so clear cut in the process. But the cold hard truth is that Zeta has either A: turned out to be a massive money loser for GM or B: GM is apparently determined to go out of their way to make it look that way squandering billions in development costs and long term product plans in the process.
I'm going with option A.
I suppose what i am trying to get at here is....if GM were actually to realize a profit on the SS my bet is that the car would be closer to 40k than 30k.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iliveonnitro
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
25
Oct 7, 2021 06:31 PM






wait, that sucks
