View Poll Results: What do you think of the new 2010 Mustang?
Awesome!! Going to get one ASAP, bad economy or not.



36
17.14%
Not bad at all! Better than most models. May get one.



65
30.95%
It's going have to grow on me. Most other models are better.



52
24.76%
No real improvement. Ford may have taken a step backwards.



48
22.86%
Forget it! I'm buying a new Camaro or Challenger.



9
4.29%
Voters: 210. You may not vote on this poll
What do you think of the new 2010?
In the '50s and '60s, having the antenna on the front fender was considered old-school, while having it on the rear fender was considered sporty, especially when swept back to any degree.
Could be similar thinking this time around? Remember, the Mustang is still primarily "retro" or "heritage".
Just a thought...
Could be similar thinking this time around? Remember, the Mustang is still primarily "retro" or "heritage".
Just a thought...
i have to say the new mustang is awsome looking, but ford really needs to step up to the plate with performance...the mustang should be putting out atleast 400 hp stock to keep up with dodge and chevy....i own a 2006 Roush stage 3, and with a supercharger it keeps up with stock challengers and will probably get smoked by the new camaro....i thought for sure they would have put more horsepower in the 2010's....
Maybe they are useing the old tech.(4.6) in the "new" design because they think that the new style "should" sell based on it's updated exterior and interior(think paying off research and development). Then once the new/cool factor wares off (should be quick) they will come out with the 5.0. Not to mention the GT500 coming and who knows how many SEs. Don't forget the fact that Ford will be on it's second model year before anyone actually gets a new camaro(if it ever comes out).
My Post:
Was In Response to This Post:
BTW: That Isn't a Celica, It's a Mitsubishi Eclipse, and I was saying that the 2010 Looks In NO FREAKING WAY Like an Eclipse.


Was In Response to This Post:
BTW: That Isn't a Celica, It's a Mitsubishi Eclipse, and I was saying that the 2010 Looks In NO FREAKING WAY Like an Eclipse.

Last edited by TampaBear67; Nov 21, 2008 at 02:06 PM.
Wow chill out. Your arguments are weird. You can't seem to stop leg humping the 2010 mustang enough to read the post and to look at what most people are trying to say about the car. I know the 2010 doesn't look like an eclipse. It looks like a real decent car until you get to the back. It sucks. The eclipse and the 2010 stang share the same unproportional rear ends. It looks too gawdy and big for the rest of the design. This pic gives a good view of how bloated the rear looks.
Last edited by sscobra; Nov 21, 2008 at 05:00 PM.
Wow chill out. Your arguments are weird. You can't seem to stop leg humping the 2010 mustang enough to read the post and to look at what most people are trying to say about the car. I know the 2010 doesn't look like an eclipse. It looks like a real decent car until you get to the back. It sucks. The eclipse and the 2010 stang share the same unproportional rear ends. It's took gawdy and big for the rest of the design. This pic gives a good view of how bloated the rear looks.
furthermore, you'd have to be crazy not to see alot of great things in the 2010. it's got a whole lot of potential, and as-is, i think it's beautifull.




as well as the 