2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Motor Trend review is up !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #21  
LLZuB's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2009
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
wooo im impressed!

5.0 baby! people are going to hate that rear end a lot more now hahaha
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #22  
3Mach1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2010MustangGT
2011 V6

0-30 1.9 sec
0-40 2.8
0-50 3.9
0-60 5.1
0-70 6.7
0-80 8.5
0-90 10.5
0-100 13.1
Passing, 45-65 mph 2.7
Quarter mile 13.7 sec @ 102.0 mph
Braking, 60-0 mph 104 ft
Lateral acceleration 0.96 g (avg)
MT figure eight 25.8 sec @ 0.71 g (avg)
Top-gear revs @ 60 mph 1800 rpm
Mother of God thats fast for a 6.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #23  
Red Jay's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa OK
HOLY SHIZZNIT!!!!

i think im officially a 2011 5.0 nutswinger now and not caring
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #24  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by Dave07997S
Neck and neck with an E92 M3...wow.
not quite neck and neck.

Mustang price as tested $39,750
E92 M3 price as tested $72,795


Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #25  
fritzOSU03's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2010
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Edmunds Reviews

http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...and-video.html
http://www.insideline.com/ford/musta...rst-drive.html
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #26  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Impressive numbers.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:26 PM
  #27  
whysoserious's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
"There is an optional Brembo brake package that brings the 14" front discs and Brembo calipers from the GT500 and unique 19-inch wheels, but while it appreciably improves feel and should better resist fade if you're lapping it constantly around a track, it's not a necessary upgrade, the stock items are plenty powerful."

Hmm. Looks like I'll be re-thinking getting the Brembo brake package. Wes says the stock brakes are good to go.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:26 PM
  #28  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
cant get the video to work on inside line
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:27 PM
  #29  
jevans.900's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Strongsville, Ohio
Originally Posted by eci
Do you guys realize the V6 outperforms a 2001 Cobra? lol
As well as my outgoing 1995 Cobra, which it will be replacing... the only issue will be the sound of the exhaust, hopefully a half way decent aftermarket solution will present itself, as most of the pre 2011 V6's on youtube have sounded like crap to me.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:27 PM
  #30  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
There was a lot of people doubting the V6 and I'm proud to say in your face! Awesome numbers for both cars. I'll be happy to owe either car someday. Now I just need to hit the lottery!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:28 PM
  #31  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
So what are you trying to say there Dave?
I was too tired do fix it..

Dave
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:31 PM
  #32  
UnrealFord's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
Well looks like I was way off on the V6 times but I was 1 tenth off the GT times, Heres my times I guessed in December
Post number 7 https://themustangsource.com/showthread.php?t=479338

v6 will be 14.2 @ 99 with the 3.31s ...actual 13.7
gt will be 12.7 @ 112 with the 3.73s ..actual 12.8

Last edited by UnrealFord; Mar 28, 2010 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:31 PM
  #33  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
why does edmunds suck at getting the best 0-60 and 1/4 numbers? Is it just me or are they always slowest with every car that gets reviewed?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #34  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Knight
not quite neck and neck.

Mustang price as tested $39,750
E92 M3 price as tested $72,795


Oh so true..
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #35  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Dave07997S
I was too tired do fix it..

Dave
no worries dave Im just pullin your leg. I'll be sure to bring those m3 number up to my euro snob friends!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #36  
Red Jay's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa OK
Autoblog is up!: http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/29/2...t-first-drive/
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #37  
2010MustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
Wow, nice sum up from autoblog.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:45 PM
  #38  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
My fav parts

Originally Posted by Autoblog
.... As far as the never ending live rear end vs. independent suspension argument goes, we're saying the following: The 2011 Ford Mustang GT sports the very best solid rear axle in the world. We'd rather have the best solid axle than a mediocre multi-point rear. Hint, hint, Chevy. 'Nuff said.

.....Speed, handling, soundtrack, brakes, interior (the GT is actually creeping into Audi levels of interior sophistication – look at those seats!), fit and finish – you name it, the Mustang's the superior sports car.

Speaking of Audi, the 5.0 makes the 354-hp S5 look like an overpriced slowpoke. We've driven both cars in anger and the 2011 Mustang GT is not only faster, but is actually rear-wheel drive, not a FWD platform fitted with Quattro all-wheel drive. Want us to go even further? We'd prefer the Mustang GT to a BMW 650i. Sure, the BMW has dash leather and... iDrive. But (again), the GT makes more power (the 650i manages 360 hp), handles better and is quieter unless you're really belting the throttle. Also, Sync's a whole lot better than iDrive, even the much improved new iDrive. Not only that, but the GT's new 5.0-liter V8 engine is in another league than (previous) competitors like the Nissan 370Z and Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8. Getting the point? In 2011, the Mustang GT is the car to beat. Welcome back, 5.0.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #39  
Dave07997S's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
no worries dave Im just pullin your leg. I'll be sure to bring those m3 number up to my euro snob friends!
The M3 was a tad quicker and did the figure eight in the mid 24 sec. range..but man you save an easy 20K+. Not to mention the M3 is rated at 14/20 for fuel economy. I am so proud of Ford and what they did with the Mustang.

I think there will be some tests that will equal and maybe even better the M3.

The best times for my 997S was 0-60 in 3.9 and the quarter in 12.3 @114.8 by Road and Track but the 997S is literally twice the price. So impressive what they did.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:51 PM
  #40  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Wow, the V6 Mustang is as quick as the Challenger R/T 0-60 and in the quarter-mile!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 PM.