The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums

2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Livernois Motorsports Tuned 2011 Mustang GT 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/16/10, 02:04 PM
  #21  
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
Thread Starter
 
Stinger1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 25, 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAE corrected

77 degrees
55% humidity
Last edited by Stinger1982; 6/16/10 at 02:05 PM.
Stinger1982 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:11 PM
  #22  
Mach 1 Member
 
Lancel's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's rather shocking, not to mention awesome. A bit hard not to get excited when a tune alone gets it almost to 400 rear wheel torque and more rear wheel horse power than Ford claims of the engine by itself.
Lancel is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:12 PM
  #23  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know where I'll be taking my car after I pick it up.
Overboost is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:12 PM
  #24  
GT Member
 
Intervention's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2008
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stinger1982
SAE corrected

77 degrees
55% humidity
Did it list what the correction factor was? I assume its 1.00-1.01 with those conditions
Intervention is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:14 PM
  #25  
Master Rasterbator
 
06GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wow, great gains from just a break-in and also the tune...can't wait to get mine!

How is the throttle response on the car with the stock tune? Is it kind of slow, like the 05-09 cars? If yes, did you have Livernois adjust the throttle sensitivity?
06GT is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:15 PM
  #26  
Bullitt Member
 
WarpdSpazm's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 26, 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simply Awesome.
WarpdSpazm is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:27 PM
  #27  
Mach 1 Member
 
Lancel's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let us know how the fuel economy goes with the tune. I'd be quite interested in that.
Lancel is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:48 PM
  #28  
FR500 Member
 
PTRocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awesome results.

<snip>
EDITED: Thanks Rick!
Last edited by PTRocks; 6/16/10 at 08:05 PM.
PTRocks is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 02:49 PM
  #29  
Mach 1 Member
 
csledd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2010
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lancel
Let us know how the fuel economy goes with the tune. I'd be quite interested in that.
For real, I need to keep gas mileage pretty decent this time around
csledd is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:22 PM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
GRABOID's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 15, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by csledd
For real, I need to keep gas mileage pretty decent this time around


Gas milage


How bout this. If it can choke a cow on fumes, drop me to 15mpg but give me 415rwhp I want it

But for real....will this be a tune available in email form from them or just a dyno tune?
GRABOID is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:38 PM
  #31  
Cobra R Member
 
fdjizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by csledd
For real, I need to keep gas mileage pretty decent this time around
What is this "gas mileage" you speak of? does it have to do with burning out?
fdjizm is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:40 PM
  #32  
Bullitt Member
 
GRABOID's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 15, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neverrmind Im a dumb ***
Last edited by GRABOID; 6/16/10 at 03:41 PM.
GRABOID is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:41 PM
  #33  
Mach 1 Member
 
csledd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2010
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I use to say I don't care about gas mileage.. but after getting about 16 mpg for 6 years kinda burns you out especially as much as I'm going to drive this car
csledd is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:42 PM
  #34  
GT Member
 
BLKCLOUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 29, 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I care about gas mileage - I would rather waste less money on gas than more.
BLKCLOUD is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:44 PM
  #35  
Bullitt Member
 
GRABOID's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 15, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stinger1982
this is TUNE ONLY

Im confused.

So 391 base with nothing?

OR

391 base with xxxx parts and then up to 415 with tune?
GRABOID is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 03:46 PM
  #36  
Bullitt Member
 
GRABOID's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 15, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by csledd
Yeah I use to say I don't care about gas mileage.. but after getting about 16 mpg for 6 years kinda burns you out especially as much as I'm going to drive this car

I have seen 8 mpg before in my younger off road days

Just jivin with ya though.
GRABOID is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 05:13 PM
  #37  
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
Thread Starter
 
Stinger1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 25, 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GRABOID
Im confused.

So 391 base with nothing?

OR

391 base with xxxx parts and then up to 415 with tune?
391 bone stock but broken in
Stinger1982 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 05:18 PM
  #38  
Member
 
Rick@Livernois's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 16, 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PTRocks
Awesome results.

I don't like the fact that they chose to plot the first baseline test instead of the second test that was done on the same day as the tune. Not 100% honest.
I went back and edited all of my posts, because we did baseline again today. The original graph I posted from today had the baseline in 4th which is incorrect. I talked to our tuner and he accidentally did the first pull in 4th gear. Run #2 and #4 were in 5th gear. So the actual baseline today after 2,000 + miles was 391 RWHP / 385 RWTQ, but the final numbers were as posted.

Here is the graph



These are typical gains we see on a car after break-in, especially hard break-in miles.

-Rick
Rick@Livernois is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 05:24 PM
  #39  
Mach 1 Member
 
TTS197's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 3, 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are some great numbers.
BTW,welcome to the site Rick!!
TTS197 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 6/16/10, 05:33 PM
  #40  
Member
 
Rick@Livernois's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 16, 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Intervention
What were the weather conditions?

Also, are these SAE or STD?

Both will correct for varying conditions, but I still think better conditions will put down better numbers, even when corrected. Thats what my tuner says anyways
These numbers are SAE

Originally Posted by TTS197
Those are some great numbers.
BTW,welcome to the site Rick!!
Thank you!

We did an auto today as well. It had less than 100 miles when baselined.

The car baselined 354 RWHP / 348 RWTQ.

After tuning, it made 375 RWHP / 365 RWTQ!



-Rick
Rick@Livernois is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Livernois Motorsports Tuned 2011 Mustang GT 5.0


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 AM.