2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Livernois Motorsports Tuned 2011 Mustang GT 5.0

Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:04 PM
  #21  
Stinger1982's Avatar
Thread Starter
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
 
Joined: November 25, 2009
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
SAE corrected

77 degrees
55% humidity

Last edited by Stinger1982; Jun 16, 2010 at 02:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #22  
Lancel's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
That's rather shocking, not to mention awesome. A bit hard not to get excited when a tune alone gets it almost to 400 rear wheel torque and more rear wheel horse power than Ford claims of the engine by itself.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #23  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
I know where I'll be taking my car after I pick it up.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #24  
Intervention's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2008
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Stinger1982
SAE corrected

77 degrees
55% humidity
Did it list what the correction factor was? I assume its 1.00-1.01 with those conditions
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:14 PM
  #25  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
Wow, great gains from just a break-in and also the tune...can't wait to get mine!

How is the throttle response on the car with the stock tune? Is it kind of slow, like the 05-09 cars? If yes, did you have Livernois adjust the throttle sensitivity?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #26  
WarpdSpazm's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 26, 2009
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Simply Awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:27 PM
  #27  
Lancel's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Let us know how the fuel economy goes with the tune. I'd be quite interested in that.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #28  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Awesome results.

<snip>
EDITED: Thanks Rick!

Last edited by PTRocks; Jun 16, 2010 at 08:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 02:49 PM
  #29  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
Originally Posted by Lancel
Let us know how the fuel economy goes with the tune. I'd be quite interested in that.
For real, I need to keep gas mileage pretty decent this time around
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #30  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by csledd
For real, I need to keep gas mileage pretty decent this time around


Gas milage


How bout this. If it can choke a cow on fumes, drop me to 15mpg but give me 415rwhp I want it

But for real....will this be a tune available in email form from them or just a dyno tune?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:38 PM
  #31  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by csledd
For real, I need to keep gas mileage pretty decent this time around
What is this "gas mileage" you speak of? does it have to do with burning out?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:40 PM
  #32  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Neverrmind Im a dumb ***

Last edited by GRABOID; Jun 16, 2010 at 03:41 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #33  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
Yeah I use to say I don't care about gas mileage.. but after getting about 16 mpg for 6 years kinda burns you out especially as much as I'm going to drive this car
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:42 PM
  #34  
BLKCLOUD's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
I care about gas mileage - I would rather waste less money on gas than more.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #35  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by Stinger1982
this is TUNE ONLY

Im confused.

So 391 base with nothing?

OR

391 base with xxxx parts and then up to 415 with tune?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 03:46 PM
  #36  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by csledd
Yeah I use to say I don't care about gas mileage.. but after getting about 16 mpg for 6 years kinda burns you out especially as much as I'm going to drive this car

I have seen 8 mpg before in my younger off road days

Just jivin with ya though.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 05:13 PM
  #37  
Stinger1982's Avatar
Thread Starter
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
 
Joined: November 25, 2009
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by GRABOID
Im confused.

So 391 base with nothing?

OR

391 base with xxxx parts and then up to 415 with tune?
391 bone stock but broken in
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #38  
Rick@Livernois's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: June 16, 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PTRocks
Awesome results.

I don't like the fact that they chose to plot the first baseline test instead of the second test that was done on the same day as the tune. Not 100% honest.
I went back and edited all of my posts, because we did baseline again today. The original graph I posted from today had the baseline in 4th which is incorrect. I talked to our tuner and he accidentally did the first pull in 4th gear. Run #2 and #4 were in 5th gear. So the actual baseline today after 2,000 + miles was 391 RWHP / 385 RWTQ, but the final numbers were as posted.

Here is the graph



These are typical gains we see on a car after break-in, especially hard break-in miles.

-Rick
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 05:24 PM
  #39  
TTS197's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Those are some great numbers.
BTW,welcome to the site Rick!!
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #40  
Rick@Livernois's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: June 16, 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Intervention
What were the weather conditions?

Also, are these SAE or STD?

Both will correct for varying conditions, but I still think better conditions will put down better numbers, even when corrected. Thats what my tuner says anyways
These numbers are SAE

Originally Posted by TTS197
Those are some great numbers.
BTW,welcome to the site Rick!!
Thank you!

We did an auto today as well. It had less than 100 miles when baselined.

The car baselined 354 RWHP / 348 RWTQ.

After tuning, it made 375 RWHP / 365 RWTQ!




-Rick
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 PM.