Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

IT'S HERE!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/12/10, 06:29 PM
  #21  
Cobra R Member
 
corvettedreamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just one nit about the video... I believe that's a 2011 Mustang.

Someone needs to fire the producer.
Old 5/12/10, 06:30 PM
  #22  
Member
 
VipG8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 12, 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam2004
2001 Camaro SS
0-60 in 5.3 seconds
1/4 mile in 13.7 seconds @ 105.6 mph

Not sure how he beat you...
Magazine times are always crap. That car went 12.9x @112. My 98 Camaro, bone stock down to the paper filter went 13.08 @108. Also the Camaro is slightly lighter.

Plus the TS was up against a better driver

Last edited by VipG8; 5/12/10 at 06:34 PM.
Old 5/12/10, 06:38 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Soap's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 25, 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VipG8
Magazine times are always crap. That car went 12.9x @112. My 98 Camaro, bone stock down to the paper filter went 13.08 @108. Also the Camaro is slightly lighter.

Plus the TS was up against a better driver
Let's let him get use to driving this new car and do it again. I wonder if he wasn't shifting to soon or not. He should have swapped and had Kevin drive the mustang and go at it...
Old 5/12/10, 06:38 PM
  #24  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Automagically's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 20, 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam2004
Check the video, it's a closer race than it should be.
That's a shame.

Hey, trade drivers, then maybe see how things go.

I know the gearing and break in may make a difference but sheesh, there is a bit more under the hood there on the Mustang. Oh well, this is just C5 fodder.

330rwhp? Just a very rough estimate of a 55hp under rating, very interesting indeed.
Old 5/12/10, 06:40 PM
  #25  
Member
 
VipG8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 12, 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Soap
Let's let him get use to driving this new car and do it again. I wonder if he wasn't shifting to soon or not. He should have swapped and had Kevin drive the mustang and go at it...
Don't know... When I ran him it certainly sounded like he was wrapping it out, but yeah he needs some seat time in it... The SS will likely fall behind once that motor has loosened up. LS1s were known to pick up 30+ HP after some mileage...
Old 5/12/10, 06:45 PM
  #26  
Bullitt Member
 
yugoboss's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your kidding right, your mostly stock ss beat your 5.0
Old 5/12/10, 06:46 PM
  #27  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by yugoboss
Your kidding right, your mostly stock ss beat your 5.0
Have you ever driven a stock LS1 SS? They can run high 12's bone stock. Easily a drives race.
Old 5/12/10, 06:48 PM
  #28  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmhines's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2006
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by yugoboss
Your kidding right, your mostly stock ss beat your 5.0
I just did a quick Google. It says a 2002 SS Camaro is 325HP. How could a stock SS possibly beat a 412 HP Mustang?

You sure your SS is stock? What are your dyno numbers?

Was the Mustang running 91 Octane or 87 octane. I'd be pretty bummed if my brand spanking new 5.0 got whooped like that.
Old 5/12/10, 06:48 PM
  #29  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dmhines
I just did a quick Google. It says a 2002 SS Camaro is 325HP. How could a stock SS possibly beat a 412 HP Mustang?

You sure your SS is stock? What are your dyno numbers?

Was the Mustang running 91 Octane or 87 octane. I'd be pretty bummed if my brand spanking new 5.0 got whooped like that.
It's called power to weight.
Old 5/12/10, 06:53 PM
  #30  
Member
 
Soap's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 25, 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
It's called power to weight.
Agreed. He was running 93 Octane, remember he had a pretty hefty passenger in his car as well... I wouldn't be too worried...
Old 5/12/10, 06:54 PM
  #31  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmhines's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2006
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
It's called power to weight.
SS: 3400 + driver
GT: 3900 + driver/passenger

Old 5/12/10, 06:55 PM
  #32  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dmhines
Was the Mustang running 91 Octane or 87 octane. I'd be pretty bummed if my brand spanking new 5.0 got whooped like that.
meh... what's thirty grand...
Old 5/12/10, 06:56 PM
  #33  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmhines's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2006
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco
meh... what's thirty grand...
Actually he said 36 Grand ...
Old 5/12/10, 06:57 PM
  #34  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SS + driver, say hes 200 lbs = 3600 lb car. PtW = 10.74 based on 335hp

GT + driver, say hes 200 lbs + 250 lbs passenger = 4050 lb car. PtW = 9.83 based on 412hp

The SS is seriously underated tho.
Old 5/12/10, 07:00 PM
  #35  
Cobra R Member
 
corvettedreamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Um, I think a sample of "1" isn't enough to start drawing conclusions. . .
Old 5/12/10, 07:00 PM
  #36  
GT Member
 
FivePointO's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 2, 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adam2004
2001 Camaro SS
0-60 in 5.3 seconds
1/4 mile in 13.7 seconds @ 105.6 mph

Not sure how he beat you...
For one is SS was not stock and he had traction control on which makes a huge difference. However, I still think the 5.0 should have won, buy hey it only had 8 miles on it...
Old 5/12/10, 07:07 PM
  #37  
Bullitt Member
 
yugoboss's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 2, 2008
Location: Alberta
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well i guess my 09 gt would get killed by a 01 ss
Old 5/12/10, 07:09 PM
  #38  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmhines's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 11, 2006
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by yugoboss
Well i guess my 09 gt would get killed by a 01 ss
For sure ... he's got you beat in HP and Curb Weight .. it would look like a GT racing a V6 ...
Old 5/12/10, 07:18 PM
  #39  
Bullitt Member
 
ksguy73's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congrats on taking delivery! I love the color choices! As far as the SS winning....traction control hinders mine bigtime so I can imagine it is far worse on the 5.0. Get a little more seat time, a few more miles on her and turn the TC off and it will be a whole different ball game!
Old 5/12/10, 08:08 PM
  #40  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I love those kinds of videos!

Great video...for the prosecution!

Vid of the speedo and the truck running down the wrong side of the street.

I have a vid of my car posted, but no firm evidence can be derived from it.

On another note, this is a manual tranny car that has been delivered.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.