2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

C&D: Over 400 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #201  
coffeejolts's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2009
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Anyhow... since C&D says "over 400HP", my seat of the pants guess is 430HP at 7000RPM. I've said it elsewhere, but just to get back on topic and all.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #202  
3Mach1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Boomer
i WISH it weighed that.

But..
It won't.
Got an estimate or idea?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #203  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by eci
You're thinking a 6MT, Brembo brake laden 2011 GT will weigh 3500 lbs?
Well, my well equipped, heavy 07 GT automatic weighs just 3440 lbs on race days (3620 lbs with me in the car), so I think I could take an '11 GT to the track with an 1/8 tank of fuel and remove the spare/jack and be within 100 lbs of my car.

Point being is that the 11 GT will be encroaching on GT500 performance if it gets over 400 hp. The GT500 runs high 11's with the right driver, but mostly 12's with an average guy on the factory tires driving. Does our beloved GT have to be a 12 second car, as well? Wouldn't a low 13 second performance be more than enough from the high volume V8 Mustang offering? That would only require about 350-360 flywheel hp assuming the 11 GT weighs in around 3600 lbs. 400 flywheel hp is gonna put the car into the 12's so very easily - even if the car weighs in at 3700 lbs (which I doubt it'll get that porky).

I'm all for a 12 second factory Mustang GT, but only if the cost can be contained to a starting MSRP under $30K. If all the cool improvements put this car closer to a starting MSRP nearing $40K, then many blue collar Mustang diehards will be priced out of the market and GT sales will tank. And most of us V8 lovin' fools won't consider the inferior soundtrack of a V6 - even a dual exhaust V6 pumping out 305hp.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #204  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by chevys
Got an estimate or idea?
Yeah.
Like I said...it would all depend on options and stuff.

It won't be weighing in the Camaro/Challenger category

Brian,
I can see where you're coming from.
If you can look at the V6 offerings, I can see the GT following the same pattern.
For X dollars you can get into X/Y/Z model which is quick and has good mileage.... but X/Y/Z+ N ... you can get a faster/better version with options.
Therefore the base of each model will be your 'economy' version (if we can call it that) but check off some option boxes, and away we go

Last edited by Boomer; Dec 11, 2009 at 03:49 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #205  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
And most of us V8 lovin' fools won't consider the inferior soundtrack of a V6 - even a dual exhaust V6 pumping out 305hp.
You are right in that statement. Give me a Camaro SS before a raspy V6.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #206  
coffeejolts's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2009
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I don't think we are in any danger of a 40k gt, unless you are talking about loading up a convertible with every option plus dealer installed accessories. My guess is that the prices will be within 1k of current
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #207  
mjbarnet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
I'm convinced that Boomer is a 2011 Mustang GT that had it's Sync system become self aware.
I'm convinced he has a 2011 GT in his garage. Come to think of it, has anyone ever seen Boomer and Alan Mulally in the same room together?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #208  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by coffeejolts
I don't think we are in any danger of a 40k gt, unless you are talking about loading up a convertible with every option plus dealer installed accessories. My guess is that the prices will be within 1k of current
You can get a 10 GT coupe past 40k with no dealer accessories.

Last edited by eci; Dec 11, 2009 at 04:33 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #209  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
base price is all I'm concerned with. Options are just that...options.

as long as the base GT is under $30K the car will be a steal!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:40 PM
  #210  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Base sucks. Why have a well performing car with a junk interior with no features.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #211  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Because all that stuff is subjective. I personally want Sync, back up camera, etc. but I realize there are many who don't need or want that.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #212  
Clino's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2008
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
Because all that stuff is subjective. I personally want Sync, back up camera, etc. but I realize there are many who don't need or want that.
Amen! I'd still have roll up windows and manual locks if I could ...no seriously
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #213  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by eci
Base sucks. Why have a well performing car with a junk interior with no features.
Because it goes fast.
Oh wait, it weighs less too. Make that FASTER.
What do you use the features for anyway?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #214  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Clino
Amen! I'd still have roll up windows and manual locks if I could ...no seriously
And I see nothing wrong with that Mike!

Although roll up windows is a bit much
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #215  
theedge67's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis Area
I have no need/want for backup camera, navigation, glass roof, auto headlights, or heated seats. I do enjoy the Sync system in my wife's Escape, but that would honestly be about the only creature comfort I would want on a Mustang. Auto climate control?? If I am cold or hot, I can turn a dial to turn up the heat/AC. If it is dark outside, I can turn on the lights with a switch. If I am backing up, I have mirrors. If my butt is cold, then it is cold.

Just give me a Mustang with a good V8 and a nice radio (not a thundering monster that can be heard for blocks around). All of the rest of the amenities are only interesting to me in a luxury/family sedan, and I am not buying a Mustang to be a luxury/family sedan. If you want a Mustang to be a luxury/family sedan, you are in the wrong market in my opinion.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:28 PM
  #216  
theedge67's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis Area
I enjoy the power windows and locks, but that is not really much of a creature comfort in my opinion.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #217  
Fireball1's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 23, 2007
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mjbarnet
Come to think of it, has anyone ever seen Boomer and Alan Mulally in the same room together?
No but last night Alan Mulally was in the same room with Jim Cramer on the set of Mad Money. When Jim Cramer asked what is so special about Ford products, Mulally mentioned a "dynamite Mustang" among other new offerings (Fiesta, Taurus, etc.) Does Mulally know something we don't know?

Regarding the upcoming V8 5.0 engine: Lexus uses a V8 5.0 engine in the ISF and it produces 416 hp and 371 tq with direct injection and variable valve timing on the intake side. It will be interesting to see if Ford can match this engine output without using direct injection.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #218  
Fireball1's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 23, 2007
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Here's the Cramer-Mulally interview:

Part 1: http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?play=1&video=1355645178
Part 2: http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?play=1&video=1355657649
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 06:21 PM
  #219  
07S197's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
 
Joined: August 20, 2007
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 2
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Clino
Amen! I'd still have roll up windows and manual locks if I could ...no seriously
+1

Originally Posted by karman
Because it goes fast.
Oh wait, it weighs less too. Make that FASTER.
What do you use the features for anyway?
+2
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:21 PM
  #220  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by theedge67
All of the rest of the amenities are only interesting to me in a luxury/family sedan, and I am not buying a Mustang to be a luxury/family sedan. If you want a Mustang to be a luxury/family sedan, you are in the wrong market in my opinion.
GT = grand touring.

So you think I should put base V6 seats in my GT500? They are lighter. I could also swap my alcantera steering wheel for the base V6 wheel, hell and also toss the Electronics Package, how useless.

But seriously....

If I wanted a dog**** interior I'd buy a 2004 Cobra.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.